ipl-logo

Marbury Vs Madison Case In 1803

775 Words4 Pages

Jessica Goodier
CJUS 101
Kyung Jhi
6 November 2014 The Marbury versus Madison case in 1803 is one of the first Supreme Court cases to apply the judicial review rule. Judicial review is a document in which legislative and executive actions are sent to review the judiciary. This principle was written by Chief Justice John Marshall in 1803. His decision led the Supreme Court become a separated branch in the government. There were disputes between Thomas Jefferson, who was a Republic, and John Adam, a Federalists once Jefferson beat Adams in the election of 1801. President John Adams, in an attempt to keep Federalist in control, appointed about forty justices of the peace and sixteen other judges. He wanted to try and keep the Federalists in …show more content…

As Secretary of State, one of their jobs is to deliver the commissions to other people. Adams had about fifty-nine commissions that needed to be handed out and Marshall attempted to finish them in time for Adams’ departure. Since he could not finish delivering all of the notices, he left it for the new secretary, which happened to James Madison. As stated beforehand, Jefferson did not agree with a lot of the choices that Adams had made, so he did not want the new Secretary of State to deliver any of the notices left by Adams. This resulted in Marbury not being appointed and he was not able to begin his term as the justice of the peace. Marbury filed a lawsuit, which resulted in a writ of mandamus. A writ of mandamus is “judicial remedy in the form of an order from a superior court” (Google.com). This ended in John Marshall having to force James Madison to deliver Marbury’s …show more content…

It was active when President John Adams had signed the document giving him his right to be the justice of the peace. The document had the seal of the President, which makes it legal in any case. Written in the law, Marbury is granted a remedy. His right to this position should be respected and granted to him. The government should have offered him protection in this position, but the Republicans disregarded all of that only because they did not want the Federalists to have power. John Marshall was a Federalist and should have taken Marbury’s side of the case, but it did not happen. Instead, he feared that the Court would be chastised for giving Marbury the commission. He did not want his authority to be ignored by the Republican Party if he did grant the document to be pushed through. He also feared that people might think that the court acted out in fear of the government. Marshall was in a dilemma all on his own with trying to make the right

Show More
Related

  • Why Is Mcculloch Vs Maryland Important

    823 Words  | 4 Pages

    In regards to Maryland's argument of state sovereignty, Chief Justice Marshall argued that the Constitution is "an instrument of the people". Although, it was ratified by the state conventions it is for the people, not the states. Lastly, Marshall stated that "the power to tax involves the power to destroy", which was a direct attack to the federal government. There were no concurrent opinions written for this

    Read More

  • Marbury Vs Madison Case Study

    418 Words  | 2 Pages

    NAME OF THE CASE: Marbury v Madison 1803 VOTE: The vote count was 4-0 BASIC FACTS OF THE CASE: In March of 1801, William Marbury (along with many others being appointed to government posts) was appointed to be a Justice of the Peace near the end of Adams administration of the presidency. Being a member of the Federalist Party, John Adams tried to appoint as many Federalists into the cabinet.

    Read More

  • Marbury V Marrison Case Summary

    471 Words  | 2 Pages

    BRIEF MARBURY v. MADISON Supreme Court of the United States, 1803 5 U.S. 137 FACTS: President John Adams appointed William Marbury as a justice of the peace in the District of Columbia towards the end of his term under the Organic Act. With an attempt to take control of the federal judiciary, the documents were signed and sealed; however, the documents weren’t delivered before President John Adams’ term ended. Subsequently, Secretary of State, James Madison, was to deliver the commission; however, newly elected, President Thomas Jefferson, refused to recognize the appointment. President Thomas Jefferson claimed the commission was invalid and advised James Madison to disregard.

    Read More

  • Marbury Vs Madison Summary

    281 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1800, the presidential election between Adams and Jefferson was a tie, and the government almost broke down. The Supreme Court had no clear purpose or power no one had even thought to build it a courtroom in the new capital city. The book tells the thrilling story of Marbury v. Madison, through which he empowered the Supreme Court and transformed the idea of the separation of powers into a working blueprint for our modern state (The Great Decision). Marbury v. Madison was certainly an integral part of this early stage in American history, but the authors seem to focus more on the actions of Jefferson, Adams, and Marshall. When President Thomas Jefferson took workplace as third president of the U.S., it painted the transfer of powerfulness

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Case: Marbury V. Madison, 1803

    700 Words  | 3 Pages

    The court decided that Marbury would not get the commission. This case established the power of judicial rule by the supreme court. Fletcher v. Peck, 1810

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Marbury Vs Madison

    1326 Words  | 6 Pages

    1. Marbury vs. Madison On his last day as president, John Adams appointed a Federalist by the name of William Marbury as the peace justice in the District of Columbia; however, Adams could not send Marbury’s commission prior to midnight. When Marbury was refused a notification of his appointment by Jefferson’s secretary of state James Madison, he implored that the Supreme Court issue a writ to oblige delivery. This case of 1803, Marbury v. Madison, was ruled by Chief John Marshall, who ruled that Madison should have provided Marbury’s commission. However, Marshall stated that Madison had no legal requirement to do so, as the Judiciary Act of 1789 that allowed the Court to issue such a writ was deemed unconstitutional.

    Read More

  • How Did Adams Reduce The Number Of Federal Judges In The Court

    513 Words  | 3 Pages

    Madison is a case of the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803 that inspired the establishment of Judicial Review. During the presidency of Adams, John Marshall appointed as Justice of the Peace in D.C. However, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state, refused to deliver Marbury's appointment papers. Without discrepancy, Marbury directly sued the Supreme Court, and order Madison to deliver the appointment papers. Nevertheless, Chief Justice John Marshall lectures Jefferson that the Court could not grant the writ because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 didn’t allow so, although the appointment should have been delivered.

    Read More

  • How Did Hamilton And Jefferson Influence On The Constitution

    747 Words  | 3 Pages

    Since Marbury was neither an ambassador nor a state, the Court had no jurisdiction over the matter; in other words, because the power to rule in this case was not expressly stated in the Constitution, it was prohibited. Because original jurisdiction didn’t apply, a lower court would have to hear the case before the Supreme Court used appellate jurisdiction to decide on the case. Thus, because the Supreme Court declared that the Constitution doesn’t give them the power to make a ruling the Marbury v. Madison case, Jefferson’s view of strict construction prevailed. Nevertheless, the Louisiana Purchase was more relevant toward the creation of our nation, and furthermore, Marbury v. Madison also represented loose

    Read More

  • How Did John Marshall Have The Power Of The Supreme Court

    1165 Words  | 5 Pages

    Marshall came up with an ingenious way of deciding the case and would forever change the Supreme Court into a coequal branch of the government. After ignoring the rule of jurisdiction, Marshall stated that once a President signed a commission and the Secretary of State had recorded them then the appointments were complete. It was also ruled that a writ of mandamus was the appropriate instrument in which to use to accomplish the delivery of the appointments by the Secretary of State. At this point it looks as it Marbury will get his appointment. In spite of this, Marshall then has to answer the question as to whether or not the Supreme Court has the authority to issue the writ.

    Read More

  • What Are The Problems Leading To The Failure Of John Adams's Presidency

    1126 Words  | 5 Pages

    His “midnight judges” were able to shape a strong government into modern day society. It was the single most important thing he achieved due to the long lasting affect his actions had. His choices led to a deeper understanding of judicial review because of John Marshall’s analysis of the Constitution. The government was also able to control much of the economy through the Second Bank of the United States. The Works Cited Alcorn, J. “John Marshall.”

    Read More

  • How Did John Marshall Impact On American History

    646 Words  | 3 Pages

    He expanded the power of the Supreme Court by declaring that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and that the Supreme Court Justices were the final deciders. In the Marbury vs. Madison case, Marshall wrote "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” John Marshall was clearly in favor of judicial power, and believed that the Supreme Court should have the final say in cases involving an interpretation of the Constitution. While establishing this, he kept the separation of powers in mind, as he wanted equal representation among the Judicial, Executive, and Legislative branches. In the Marbury vs. Madison, John Marshall declared that the Judicial Branch could not force Madison to deliver the commission.

    Read More

  • Marbury Vs Madison Case Summary

    556 Words  | 3 Pages

    They petitioned for a writ of mandamus. This is is an order from a court, to a lower government official, demanding that the lower official correctly complete their initial duties or correct an abuse of discretion. Therefore, Marbury wanted Madison to be ordered to deliver the owed commission. There were a few obvious issues in this case including; does Marbury have a right to the commission? Does

    Read More

  • How Did John Marshall Become The Head Of The Supreme Court?

    1043 Words  | 5 Pages

    Marbury demanded that the spot was his. The situation escalated and was finally taken up in the Supreme Court. Once there, John Marshall ruled that although he felt it morally right that Marbury be given the position he was promised in the document, the failure to have the document commissioned on time prevented him from taking up the position. In doing so John Marshall gave the supreme court the power to review the validity of a legislative act - Judicial review. This increased the Judicial Branch's power and gave it equal standing with the legislative and executive branches.

    Read More

  • Marbury Vs Madison 1803

    157 Words  | 1 Pages

    Marbury v. Madison is important in the American political system. Back in 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall wrote the majority opinion. Marshall supported a strong national government. He ruled that the Court could not order Madison to give Marbury the commission because the Judiciary Act of 1789. This marked as the first time the Supreme Court declared that a law passed

    Read More

  • Why The Judicial Branch Is The Most Powerful

    478 Words  | 2 Pages

    Madison court case that took place in 1803. The law that was declared by the Supreme Court at this hearing was that a court has the power to declare an act of Congress void if it goes against the Constitution. This case took place because President John Adams had appointed William Marbury as justice of the peace in the District of Columbia, and the new president, Thomas Jefferson, did not agree with this decision. William Marbury was not appointed by the normal regulation, which was that the Secretary of State, James Madison, needed to make a notice of the appointment. James Madison did not follow through and make a notice of Marbury’s appointment; therefore, he sued James Madison, which was where the Supreme Court came in place.

    Read More

More about Marbury Vs Madison Case In 1803

Open Document