The words of Marcus Aurelius in The Meditations highlighted how rulership was conceived of good statesmanship at the time he was ruling the Roman Empire. The Meditations was written in the form of a personal notebook, most probably written while Aurelius was on campaign in central Europe c. AD 171-175. The treatise was organized in twelve different books, providing a guideline on how to use reason and logic, how to control one’s emotions, and how to practice self-mastery. (enotes, 2014) Marcus Aurelius was a philosopher as well as a Roman Emperor and was numbered the last of the “five good emperors”. According to the great historian Edward Gibbon, this was an era in which “the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of wisdom and virtue.” (Edward Gibbon, vol. 1, chap. 3, p. 90) A Stoic is defined as a member of the ancient Greek school of philosophy founded by Zeno of Citium, holding that virtue and happiness can be attained only by submission to destiny and the natural law. (Dictionary.com, 2014) In Aurelius’ position, Zeno taught him that ruling an Empire required him to become free from passion, unmoved by joy or grief and submit without complaint to unavoidable necessity in order to make wise decisions. In keeping with the Stoic principles, Marcus Aurelius calls for the mind to regulate the body, which meant that he had to lead a very controlled and contemplative life. (Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, chap.4, p. 159)
Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations
Goldsworthy book provides detail on the accomplishments and failures that Augustus experiences. Failures that aren’t mentioned as much compared to his successes. Includes relevant information on how Augustus created a new system of government. Goldsworthy is able to provide evidence on a side of August that many would not have expected or
From about 27 BCE to 180 BCE, Rome enjoyed a period time titled Pax Romana. During that time, Rome's economy and culture flourished. Arguably, they flourished because there was peace and there was internal stability. However, at the end of Marcus Aurelius' reign in 180 BCE, the Roman Empire slowly transitioned out of the classical ages into a period of disorder from which it would never recover. That transition was reflected in the empire's politics and culture; even so, elements of Rome as it was would also remain in the empire's politics and culture.
Augustus wrote the Deeds of The Devine Augustus, it was a first person account of his rule over Rome. It was written before his death in 14 A.D. Augustus wrote this document as part autobiography and part last will and testament. The main story line of The Deed of The Devine Augustus describes Augustus’ political career, his military success, and ultimately serves as propaganda to inspire the Romans to continue in the path of his empire.
In Julie Otsuka’s novel, When the Emperor was Divine, a nameless Japanese-American family is uprooted, exported, and abandoned by their own government. The family, along with thousands of others, lived in an internment camp for the duration of World War II, their only crime being their Japanese heritage. All Americans should know the story well, however, beyond public knowledge, there is a hidden history of Japanese-American imprisonment that extends beyond the less malicious internment of families. It is kept in the dark, easily overlooked, only found when one is willing to search.
Suetonius wrote about the life of Cesar Augustus, the emperor of Rome. Suetonius tried to justify his dictatorship to the people of Rome, so that future generations would have no contradictory ideas towards the government. In this way, Rome would maintain peace, and people would follow and take as an example the government of Cesar Augustus as the best of all. The solution of Suetonius was to give a good image to the readers with the actions and facts that the emperor did at that time, “Found it on brick, but left it on marble” (Suetonius,115). Suetonius made the emperor look like a perfect person, who governed rigidly but obtained an efficient and honest administration.
Political figures in art has always been an important part of our history, culture and artistic representation, Roman and Byzantine art is a classic case of these representations. The Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius and Justinian as World Conqueror are two examples that demonstrate the power and prestige of these political authorities. First, Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius from the Roman, Italy (173-176 CE) measures 11’6” high, cast in bronze. Secondly, Justinian as World conqueror from Byzantium period measures 13” x 11” entire panel, center panel 7” x 5” and 1” deep. The creator of the equestrian statue is unknown, however, the creator of Justinian’s ivory relief was probably made by the imperial work of Constantinople.
If a horse should be prideful and say, "I am handsome," it would be supportable. But when [he is] prideful, and say, "I have a handsome horse," know that [he is] proud of what is, in fact, only the good of the horse.” (#6). The Stoic knows that being humble is an important part of being a good member of society. It is a blend of these two aspects of being a Stoic, being humble in decision making and keeping peace, this is what makes the Stoics who follow “Then Handbook”, by Epictetus, truly good members of a
Out of Touch With Society To some people, loosing a simple item can unleash a typhoon of emotions. People will panic at the thought of misplacing their phones or forgetting when they last wore their favorite shirt. These accessory losses are little to nothing compared to the loss the Japanese American people suffered during the second World War. Julie Otsuka, a recipient of the PEN/Faulkner Award, the Asian American Literary Award, the American Library Association Alex Award, wrote a novel based on her own family history.
The great Empire of Rome, the greatest power to have ruled the Mediterranean. The Roman empire thrived in the time of Julius Caesar around 47 BC. Caesar had made Rome into an empire, but after he died, Rome started its downfall. It was unthinkable. The great Roman empire’s reign was over.
The composition and the governing structure of the Roman republic was not uniform throughout its existence, but some of the fundamental elements of its government came into being in the immediate aftermath of the monarchy’s collapse. Therefore, it is unsurprising that many of these institutions were created in reaction to the monarchy and its failures, and thus were shaped by this relationship. For example, the fundamental opposition to monarchy and the rule of kings that came with the experience of the Kingdom of Rome, remained quite strong in the Roman mindset throughout the existence of the Republic and into the beginnings of the Roman Empire, and its influence can be seen throughout Roman political discourse especially in the discussion
From the beginning of his rule in 27 B.C., peace reigned throughout the empire called the Pax Romana, or Roman Peace. Augustus was Rome’s most stable and powerful emperor and sustained Rome by keeping peace and glorifying the empire as well. Augustus stabilized the frontier of Rome which caused the Pax Romana. This two-hundred year period saw unprecedented peace and economic prosperity throughout the empire, which spanned from England in the north, to Morocco in the south and Iraq in the east.1 The population of the vast empire thrived to seventy-million people. The empire was big enough and was well-managed by Augustus’s system of government.
One notable Stoic was Marcus Aurelius who was a Roman emperor. The stoics believed that in order for us to be better, people who are just and wise, we must train our impulses which influences how we behave. We must always be in harmony with our nature. Another Hellenistic philosophy that existed during that period was skepticism. The skeptics uphold that humans must refrain from believing all dogmas.
Apart from Marcus Aurelius's prestigious political position, he was a well-known practitioner of stoicism. In fact his writing commonly old as "Meditations" is considered by many to be one of the greatest works of all of philosophy. The overarching theme that Marcus Aurelius attempts to convey, insta deal with your problems in an ideal and effective manner. He felt if you just miserably observe your problem, you wouldn't solve it as well as if you had just gotten it done
In William Shakespeare’s drama Julius Caesar, the protagonist is Marcus Brutus. His decisions are based on his personal philosophy of stoicism as stoics try not to be influenced by their emotions. Examples of Brutus showing his stoicism include when Brutus tells the audience that he loves Caesar although this does not stop him from making the choice to kill him. Stoics believe that a person must make his own decisions based on logic and reasoning, which is why he didn’t let his feelings for Julius stop him from “saving” Rome. Although Brutus and Cassius are partners in killing Julius, Cassius was really using Brutus to gain power and later turn on him.
Brutus and Cassius are two prominent conspirators in the play Julius Caesar; one of these two fits Aristotle's depiction of a tragic hero. The difference between a normal hero and a tragic hero is that the latter will have a tragic flaw that keeps them from succeeding. These characters are often sympathetic and will cleave to the reader's pity. Firstly, we shall discuss Cassius. He was a man of questionable character.