While this is the case in the observer of the art it is a different story for the artist. When they go to create their art they have a set emotion in mind and they work to integrate it into their piece. Imagination is used in their creative process. Through using their imagination, they are able to get the emotion that they desire into the art and the reaction that they desire from the audience. To fully understand how an art network works it can help to relate it to an artist.
- Trust in yourself and your work - You have to trust your work and its value. There were times when I got hurtful comments when I worked with certain photographers. I realized that I shouldn 't second guess my work. It was a learning experience. Now that I trust myself, it helps me to focus on my
People can rely on literacy and social awareness to help them be better aware and more thoughtful. But when people have neither of these skills it can harm the view they have of their surroundings. Fahrenheit 451 is an example of what would happen if social awareness and literacy were looked down on. Over time in the society where everything takes place in, not many are socially aware or can read, resulting to people going to great lengths for their beliefs and wants that they don 't really think through. In the novel Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury shows that literacy and social awareness are important for society through the use of characterization and symbolism in the story.
The jumping off point for this project came when I was reflecting on and reviewing my works and practices to date, trying to locate the question of what it is I wish to express. My work thus far has been interrelated and my voice as an artist is imbued within the corporeal and the formal qualities of the materials. My research and practice lie within the human condition, from the somatic to the many varied psychological landscapes we experience. I explore the question of what it means to be human and our understanding of ‘place’ within the world. Maurice Merleau Ponty’s essay ‘Eye and Mind’ examines how art displays the act of viewing, extending from Martin Heidegger’s Being-in-the-world, ‘The Sense of Being’.
In Lamott’s writing, she animates her ideas of writing raft drafts to the readers. Lamott delivers her message very creatively by using various descriptive and poetic phrases, making her piece entertaining and impressing. She frankly talks about her struggles as a writer in order to encourage the readers to feel comfortable making their first attempts. However, because of her language style in the article, her argument becomes vague. From the reader’s point of view, the intention of this article seems to be a ‘writing guide for beginners’ rather than an argumentative essay because her writing lacks evidence and credibility.
For people who likes art, art is beautiful; it is a part of history, past experience and what an individual imagines. However, for the artist it is a part of his/her life, it is the perception the artist holds about events around and serves as a way to demonstrate history. Therefore, any piece of art was influenced by various factors. These factors range from economic, political, social and many more. Taking the factors discussed above, the following paper discusses the factors that influenced the style of Yayoi Kusama’s installations.
The expectations of the design and books do not tend for rule breaking, but as illustrators are for the looking as they are familiar with the context of picture books due to their conceptual format. They know the picture book can be enhanced through art and visual effects and making the writing and pictures mixed with double page standards or other perspectives. Writers and illustrators often break the rules for thinking out-of-the-box and pushing the boundaries of publishing the picture books.
It is a manner of finding an identity or a set of ideas inside other people’s works and whether accepting or refuting them in a manner which does not degrade the works of others. A critic must be artistic and poetic and should have a writing style that captivates the readers and sends them on a journey of thoughts, like in Fuller’s case. However, a critic must, in my opinion, also be a scientist, in the sense of thought organization and ability to structure a belief in an easy conduct. Granted, art and its critique are far from being a science, and sometimes, they may get chaotic and overwhelming to the readers; but a good critic should always know how to structure a set of thoughts in the easiest way possible, without losing the artistic tone of the
Writing is intimidating. Done well means one has contributed signal, instead of noise. It is meant for readers to hear my voice and understand where I have come from. Putting one’s thoughts down on paper can let out little surprises the writer themselves may not have put much thought into specifically. It
It says, “Even some highly trained writers or speaks make a mistake such on Wayne Booth”. So a rhetor should be more careful and practice because it is one way of persuasion point to an audience. Argument is different than persuasion. It stands to discuss and to agree or not agree with situation. It depends on the knowledge and what you are arguing about, sometimes an audience does not have to give the reason.