As Marie Osmond said, “I don’t play politics; I don’t do that. I think there’s too many celebrities out there claiming what they believe. I think it’s our job to get people out to study the issues and to know what they believe and what they vote for”. It is sad that not a lot of celebrities think the same way Marie Osmond does about politics. Good morning honourable judges, my fellow competitors, ladies and gentlemen. Today’s world is dominated by the media. The younger generation has been constantly bombarded with different information, whether it be true or false. One of the main contributors to this are Celebrities. Celebrities should not be permitted to use their public platform to make political statements for the following reasons. Celebrities are out of touch with reality. They have been detached from financial problems for years because of their wealth. In addition to that, celebrities often get ahead of themselves. They hear one side of the story and goes straight to the press without double checking their information. Furthermore, celebrities hold too much power over the youth as the younger generation idolize and look up to them. For these reasons, celebrities should not …show more content…
Jane Fonda is an excellent example of this. She was against the pipelines due to the effects it has on the environment and the First Nations. She failed to notice Canada’s economy which was low at the time and Fort McMurray had recently faced a devastating natural disaster. Canada pushed through with the pipelines in order to stimulate the economy and create jobs for people. She misinformed many people by going straight to the media with her one sided information instead of looking further into the issue. Fonda’s example highlights why celebrities should not use their public platform to make political
When making a decision on who the next president should be, one tends to look at who the supporters of the particular candidate are. There is, however, one particular candidate who has the support of the nation’s very own first lady and that person is Hillary Clinton. In an article published by “The Washington Post”, it provides the entire transcript that was used when Michelle Obama delivered her speech to the Democratic National Convention, in Philadelphia about why she believes that the next U.S. president should be Mrs. Clinton. One of many persuasive techniques that Mrs. Obama uses in her speech is pathos, which is when one attempts to persuade someone into doing something through the use of emotions. Mrs. Obama uses pathos successfully because she compels the audience to empathize with her, motivates them into taking action, and provides a reasonable argument as to why she believes that Hillary Clinton should be president.
Lena Horne Actress and Activist Lena Horne was a star who broke racial barriers. In a suppressive 1900s America, an African American woman was determined to step into the limelight to defy the racial standards of her time. She faced an uphill battle trying to create a career from her childhood, with little support from her own family, let alone a white dominated industry. When she finally proved to be an astonishing performer and struck a deal with a major Hollywood studio, she was still held back by racial segregation laws still in effect in the south. Horne recognized her influence and used her talents to go from actress to activist.
Historically, throughout every presidential election the state and atmosphere of the country shifts; whether it be towards a negative or positive direction depending on the, subjective, perception of the citizen. In the United States of America, every four years, a new presidential candidate is chosen, through such, arguably life-changing event, the epitome of what a democracy looks like is showcased and performed for the world. As historic and important the 2016 election was in America, considering a woman and celebrity ran against each other, it is evident that what is to come, within the 2020 election, will only further highlight polarizing opinions/parties of American citizens; as it did with the 2016 presidential election. For a prospective
An example that Smith uses is, “They also use their celebrity status to support certain organizations. So why are limitations all of a sudden invoked when an athlete expresses an unpopular opinion”? Smith did a great job of using logos to convince her audience that politics have a huge impact on our lives, and that public figures should have the right to stand up for what they believe
Celebrity endorsement or opposition should be avoided, this type of advertising ploy is cliched and quite arguably has become redundant. Appealing
Gail Collins continuously writes about politics and how the world, especially the United States, is affected by this and how it is currently functioning. Collins speaks consistently about president Donald Trump’s political career and the actions that he has taken throughout his years as a politician. I confirm Gail Collins’ stance in the opinions she has put forth throughout her career as a New York Times columnist. Over the past few weeks, I have been engaged in Gail Collins’ work as she has taught me about politics and what is happening in our world currently.
In general, the media tends to cover races that are competitive, and the more competitive the race, the more likely it will be covered. Also, when races have the potential to interest viewers in other ways, such as elections in which celebrities run for office, there is a greater chance of media coverage as well. Through the use of paid media, contrast and attack ads, and the internet in general, television and media affect the choice of candidates in presidential elections in multiple ways. In terms of paid media, as stated in “Am Gov 2015-2016,” candidates may utilize paid media in order to “emphasize their good character and their stand on important issues” (220).
Thesis 1: Charlton Heston is directly responsible for the large amount of gun ownership in America and is thus responsible for the large amount of gun related violence in America. If he stopped his rallying then gun violence would drop. Response: I disagree with this statement because Charlton Heston only promotes legal ownership of guns, and he does not support any form of violence and only encourages guns be used for self defence.
Many of these celebrities have created a toxic environment that builds peer pressure in society. As seen with advertisements and body shaming that celebrities do whether it 's meant or not people are being influenced by this. Individuals have a growing amount of peer pressure to follow celebrities such as Kim Kardashian and follow their trends due to the poisoning of pure pressure. People may not fit in if they don’t follow to the status quo which has the potential to lead to a ruined society. Individuals are wasting time on entertainment while they can be doing more productive things.
Those who are considered famous and popular in today's society and pop culture are those who can make the most difference in our free society. Whole families of celebrities like the Kardashians and those who are just married or even single, who are always in the tabloids and on television, can use this position of social power to voice their opinions. This public and widespread voicing of opinion will gain followers of people who agree and can make a difference to make laws and policies more fair and correct in regards to the constitution. Muhammad Ali chose to stand his ground and not be drafted into the Vietnam war. He believed that he needed to fight for equality with white people, not innocent people across the Pacific Ocean that had never bothered him.
Most of his films earned billions of dollars in the box office, and that just mean that he is basically paid so much. However, despite being one of the biggest names in Hollywood, Depp finds himself in a financial crisis. The Hollywood Reporter recently released a report regarding the fact that Depp earned more than $650 million in the last 13 years, but then again financial experts said that the actor surely spent more than what he could afford if he is indeed in a middle of a financial crisis right now since that amount of money is a lot. However, the big question is, who’s fault it
Even when celebrities follow the practice of a particular pattern of constantly re-inventing themselves through controversy it promotes public interest and sparks curiosity it often makes front-page news in the media. This is, in a sense, publicity for the celebrity. As it promotes their name and their brand which helps them become more and more recognized. Sociologist Goffman would
As a result, people’s attachments for tangible goods become more intense, especially celebrities. Celebrities have spent most of their lifetime persisting fame and wealth. However, their sufferings and sacrifices are eventually greater than common people. Everything that they do is exposed on social medias. They cannot do things that the average person can.
My last paragraph are people’s opinions and professionals quotes about it. Celebrities get paid way too much money. They should at least use their money for a good cause. They should give some of their money to people who are risking their lives and fighting for our country for us. Some use their money for completely wrong things.
Celebrities with positive influence are not given the opportunity to spread their positive message to the world because the spotlight is mostly given to those who have no dreams and goals in life.