Mark Twain Criticism

2222 Words9 Pages
Most of the critics of Mark Twain do not focus on his interest towards science and scientific researches. Mark Twain spent his time with Nikola Tesla at Tesla 's laboratory. To the great surprise of his readers he was also patented an improvement in modifiable and removable straps for garments. Mark Twain showed his distaste for imperialism of any sort. His writings stand as a strong evidence for his humanitarian outlook on the American society. He stood as a strong representative for the American Anti-Imperialist League, which was against the conquest of the Philippines by the United States. His work expressing his sentiments and pathos for the people of Philippines was posthumously published in 1924, in retort to the Moro Crater Massacre,…show more content…
Racism and slavery are explored side by side in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn in an informal and critical tone. But the idea is expressed through the little boy Huckleberry Finn. At times the tone is ironic and ridiculing and is full of pranks and boyish enthusiasm. It is consistent throughout the novel which attracts the attention of the critics and common readers. As the description is simple, it is very easy to understand. Black English vernacular which is the typical slang of the southerners also is used by Mark Twain. His uncomplicated, undemanding and straightforward diction speaks about the need for a soft corner for the people who are ill-treated and less…show more content…
This dissertation entitled “Humanism in the select Novels of Mark Twain” discusses about how Mark twain is concerned with what is right and wrong for a society to thrive well. He opposes slavery and racism as it de-promotes good human tendency and encourages superiority among a sector. He has employed remarkable sense of humour, realism, influential vernacular language, seemingly simple but reflective language and strong but young characters to speak for the betterment of people who have been ill-treated since imperialism. Mark Twain is considered as a typical representative who raises his voice for the voiceless in the American
Open Document