INTRODUCTION A market exist wherever there are buyers and sellers of a particular good. A market economy is an economy which allows the market to determine the allocation of resources. It is obvious that market fails. Still, the question needs to be asked: ‘fail at what?’ The response to the question is: ‘Fail at delivering economic resources’
(Bamford and Grant, 2013). A pricing system cannot easily take care of externalities without non-market intervention. Nor can it provide a sufficient amount of public goods. Where there are such problems in allocating resources, these are instances of market failure (peter et al, 2000). Market failure exists when the competitive result of markets is not efficient from the point of view of
society.
…show more content…
However, in many market, there are either only a small number of buyer or smaller number of supplier. Market failure is likely to exist in a market where competition is not perfect. In a market economy, firms may come to dominate and have monopoly power which can lead to higher prices and lower level of output leading to a loss in welfare. This also leads to allocative and productive inefficiency (Anderton 2008). A market should be competitive because if a firm is dominant, the firm will be able to put prices to a level that is above marginal cost.
• ECONOMIC INEQUALITY: . The cause of market failure is not only from inefficiency in the economy. It can also be caused by economic inequality. In a free market economy, it depends on the income of the household in which an individual live for an individual to consume. Whenever there is inequality in income and wealth of different groups in a society government may intervene, thereby reallocating income to make it more equal the state may provide income in form of benefits, or goods and services such as healthcare services etc. in order to increase consumption level to low income
…show more content…
Externalities often arise because property rights are not completely allocated. An alternative to regulation is for government to extend property rights to the citizens. Extension of property right can give workers the right to sue for compensation if the worker gets injured in the work place (Anderton, 2008). Extending property right is a means of internalizing externality by doing this the government will be able to eliminate the externality by bringing it back into framework of the market system.
• THROUGH MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM PRICING POLICY: The government may help in protecting the consumers and the producers through the use of pricing policies. Minimum pricing policy is used by government to protect the producers because if a seller import goods, due to high import duty on the product the seller will increase the price of the product. Then the government will help the producers by buying the surplus since there has been reduction in demand.
Companies like in The True cost, and other industries deal with monopolies. Workers continue to lose what little amount of money they earn while the owners of high end companies get what they want. 40 million people are in textile industries and have a minimum wage of 3 dollars a day and 10 dollars a month. Textile workers struggle with different things. With companies creating monopolies, it makes it harder for the workers with diseases and other things.
The root of the inequality issue lies in the government policies, as they hold the power to determine where the money lies on the spectrum of the rich, middle class and the poor. Normally, when an economy is suffering, employment as well as wages adjust accordingly and sales as well as profits suffer as well. However, because of this inequality employment rates and wages actually suffer while the sales profit. Political forces, as much as economic ones are what leads to inequality. As the government controls the distribution of sources as well the distribution of income that comes from a market.
With this in mind i hope you enjoy my essay. A Market economy can also be known as a “free market”, the “Invisible hand”, “Laissez-Faire” as well as many others. There are many advantages to this such as self reliance witch is designed to eliminate “lazy” people. As well as lower prices, better quality products, and more variety.
Thomas J. Di Lorenzo was born on August 8, 1954. He was an American economic professor at Loyola University Maryland Sellinger School of Business since 1992 and identifies himself as an believer of the Austrian School of economics. He is a member of the research team at The Independent Institute, a senior associate of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. He holds a Doctor of Philosophy in Economics in Virginia Technology. He became professor in a few universities in the US and wrote many books and articles containing controversial issues about economic situation and political issues.
This is an illustration of someone trying to make the economy accessible for everyone. However severe economic inequality was instead a result of the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a small number of industrialists. As large corporations dominated their respective industries, they exercised significant control over markets, including pricing, wages, and
The temporary character of competitiveness, which can be lowered anytime. 4. The massive spending on technological advances. 5. The brand image misconception in which low prices are usually associated with low quality product.
1. Introduction Income inequality has grown significantly during this past decades and this phenomenon continues to increase over the years. This problem is constantly discussed in the daily news all around the world. Several consequences of this increase of inequality between people leads to economic problems such as high unemployment rates, lack of work for young people, fall of demand for certain product. The gap between rich and poor is increasing, the rich are richer and the poor are poorer as a result politicians and economists try to adopt certain policies in order to reduce this gap.
To provide such goods as education, sanitation and parks, the government taxes their citizens to afford the public goods. Since the public goods are funded by the taxes of the citizens, then all the citizens have the right to benefit from them. In addition, the government establishes rules and regulations that benefit society in maintaining the environment safe from harm. Not many governments promote equality, but after gaining prominence in the twentieth century, promoting equality is the third major purpose of government in many different places. With the purpose of promoting equality, the government’s goal is to establish the concept of welfare state, civil rights and equality under the law.
On the one hand, providing state subsidy might be a good tool for this challenge. In this way relatively poor people in society are helped to increase their welfare and to limit inequality. On the other hand, there is the possibility to decrease inequality by limiting some of the welfare of the relatively rich people in society. This can be done by raising taxes on luxury goods while keeping the tax on other goods the same. However, a sales tax on
Hence, the resulting market failure encourages the government intervention through the price control mechanism although seemingly lead to welfare
The model of the Five Competitive Forces, developed by Michael E. Porter, is based on corporate strategy, industry structure and the way they change. Porter has identified five competitive forces that shape every industry and every market and they determine the intensity of competition and hence the profitability and attractiveness of an industry. We further look into how the strategy and industry structure is placed in the field of healthcare and hospitals and analyze the attractiveness of the overall industry. 2.2 Rivalry among competitors Industry Rivalry is one of the 5 forces used to determine the intensity of competition in the industry. Competition in health care is the potential to provide with a mechanism to reduce cost and hence accessible
When there is a large number of sellers and a large number of buyers in a market, that market is regarded as a perfectly competitive market or industry. In a perfectly competitive market, a single firm cannot dictate the pace and the selling price (Khan Academy, n.d.). In other words, one firm cannot set the prices and the competitors are obligated to market prices. What is fascinating about a perfectly competitive industry is that the barriers that prevent new firms from entering the industry are flexible; that means there are minor barriers of entry as well as little or no barriers to exit the industry (Rittenberg & Tregarthen, 2009). Additionally, buyers and sellers have all the necessary information to make a decision to buy or sell a product.
Regulations that the government implement, licensing for example, increases the barrier of entry into the market and decreases ways for the traders to gratify consumer demand. This case is prevalent in the monopoly market. The market is sometimes best to decide how much and what to produce since it has better information and knowledge of the consumers compared to the government. Economic decisions may also not be competent when the government is motivated by political power rather than economic imperatives. Sometimes, economic policies are designed to retain power rather than to ensure maximum efficiency in the economy.
The market structure will affect how firm price their product in the industry. The market structure will affect the supply of different commodity in the market. When the competition is high there is a high supply of commodity as different companies tries to dominate the markets. A market structure will affect the barrier to entry for the companies that intend to join that market. A monopoly markets structure has the biggest level of barriers to entry while the perfectly competitive market has zero percent level of barriers to entry.
1.0 INTRODUCTION In an economy, there exists different market structures to accommodate different industries and firms. This study will be made to understand in further depth the market power of different market structures, and in particular an example of using case studies of agricultural sector of the French markets to explain how an ideal perfectly competitive market works. This will then be further strengthened with several references linked to the case study. 1.1 Monopoly market