The tragedy of Doctor Faustus marked a period of transition from traditional morality play centered drama to a type which focused on new Renaissance individualism. Marlowe used the stage as a vehicle to raise contentious issues to the Elizabethan audience to which Doctor Faustus was first performed. Through the play’s alluring combination of magic, fantasy and danger throughout the performance, audience members become inextricably intertwined with the character of Faustus and ultimately are forced to question elements of their own beliefs and moral stances. The provocative nature of the character of Faustus is evident in the extract as he postulates that “hell’s a fable”- an outlandish remark that would shock an Elizabethan spectator. The …show more content…
In the case of traditional Greek tragedy, the protagonist’s downfall was centered upon the omnipotence of the gods – and likewise is the Calvinist concept of predestination that is central to the understanding of Faustus. The play raises problems that are intrinsic to the idea of the elect - primarily through Faustus’ deal with Lucifer. It is questionable whether the tragic ending of Faustus was a direct result of his decision to trade his soul, or whether Faustus was in fact damned from the beginning and was aware of this – therefore choosing instead to have the best life he can through his limitless desire. The latter may be evident in Faustus’ fatalistic “Che sará, sará” attitude during his opening soliloquy (Marlowe, Act 1: Line 47). Faustus rejects the Christian idea of redemption; as he declares: “Why then belike we must sin / And so consequently die” and that we only “deceive ourselves” (Marlowe, Act 1: Lines 44-46) by believing that sin does not exist and that ultimately, Christianity can only promise …show more content…
While Faustus blindly dismisses his plea and urges him to have “manly fortitude” (Marlowe, Act 3: Line 85), the audience would be able to see that Mephistopheles is issuing a warning and a chance for redemption to Faustus, and that hell is enough to bring horror to him, even as a devil. A cathartic effect is produced as the audience would feel pity for Faustus’ blindness, and all the while fear the effects of his necromancy – ingraining the audience further into the theatrical
In times of bloodshed and malice, do you stay devoted to your family and companions or do you pursue the love of your life? These are the questions Romeo and Juliet, our protagonists and lovers, had to ask themselves consistently throughout the play. Romeo and Juliet is a classical theater piece that addresses forbidden love amongst the freights of war between two households, the Montagues and the Capulets. That being said, there have been abundant amounts of renditions featuring the same scenarios. This essay will be analyzing and contrasting how well the 1996 version of Romeo and Juliet and the movie Gnomeo and Juliet correspond to Shakespeare's original
William Shakespeare’s “Othello” was a great example to showcase sacrifices made by characters to accomplish revenge or obtain power. Shakespeare told the story of Othello, a tragic hero, who was manipulated by Iago, which motivated him to kill his own wife. From this story, Shakespeare’s main goal was to portray characters making sacrifices for their ambitions. From this play, Shakespeare puts forth the idea of sacrifice through pointing out the importance of reputation and how sacrifices must be made to silence the truth.
William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet is filled with numerous irresponsible choices that determine the outcome of the play. Some choices barely affect the outcome of the play, while others are for what the play is known. Of these many pivotal choices, many are made by Romeo. Romeo’s personality and belief in fate are the main reasons for the careless decisions.
With the laws of Venice miles behind them, the characters of Othello seem to have entered a Hobbesian state of nature where anything is permissible so long as it furthers the individual interest. Indeed, upon arriving in Cyprus, the majority of the characters have lives that are “poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (Hobbes 76). Othello is the perfect illustration of the dangers of rhetoric. Iago exemplified the type of rhetoric that made the Greek demagogues threatening.
The common aim of playwrights of any time or location is to capture and hold the attention of their audience; this is what Shakespeare has clearly done. The tragedy of Othello, the Moor of Venice, is one of Shakespeare 's most renowned plays. Through construction of intriguing characters, exploration of universal themes, use of comic relief and a well-written script featuring a compelling plot, Shakespeare ensured the tragedy of Othello would hold the interest of the audience; despite being over four centuries old. It possesses so many conditions that can be accentuated to hit nerves with both a Shakespearean and modern audience. The entire plot of Othello is very much like the attitudes and methods of our modern day society.
Unfortunately, Dante’s journey transitions from the wood into the depths of Hell where he and readers discover the Christian view of sin, repentance, and the need for a savior. The author introduces his readers to Jesus Christ during Virgil and Dante’s conversation about the lost souls in Limbo. In the First Circle of Hell, known as Limbo, the lost souls that did not have an opportunity to meet Jesus Christ dwell in this place. Although they did not sin, they did not have a proper relationship with God through Jesus Christ. However, Virgil testifies about Jesus’ decision into Hell when he says, “ I saw a mighty lord descend to us…
“Romeo and Juliet” by William Shakespeare entertains the audience through use of character, language and drama. The plot focuses on the theme of conflict and consequences, using deep characterisation, descriptive language and high drama to entertain. Act 3 Scene 1 focuses on a brutal feud between two enemies and Act 3 Scene 5 follows the patriarchal society’s approach to women marriage and societal expectations. Shakespeare forces the audience to engage with the idea of conflict and what it must have been like to live through this time. Shakespeare cleverly utilises a changing atmosphere in Act 3 Scene 1 to expertly entertain his audience.
In the twenty-first century, the plays of William Shakespeare may at first appear dated and irrelevant: they use archaic language, are set in the age of Kings and Queens, and the Kingdom of England. However, it would be plainly mistaken to construe that Shakespeare’s works do not still remain integral to a twenty-first century society. Shakespeare’s plays gave the words and expressions one uses every day, revolutionized the art of theater as it was known, and forewarned about issues that would unknowingly still apply centuries later. Therefore, Shakespeare has had a profound effect on our lives by enriching our language and culture, as well as providing ideas that would still apply five centuries later, and it would thus behoove us to learn from his works and life.
The conventions of tragedy and comedy, such as the tragedy in Oedipus Rex and the comedy in The Taming of the Shrew, can shape the way the play is developed. Thorough analysis can reveal these dramas to be discussions of human experience. As Laurence Olivier once said: “The office of drama is to exercise, possibly exhaust, human emotions. The purpose of comedy is to tickle those emotions into an expression of light relief; of tragedy, to wound them and bring relief of tears. Disgust and terror are the other points of the compass.”