Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were both leaders of the Civil Rights movement often on opposite ends of the movement. The two men approached the need for equality in the black community from differing perspectives while sharing a similar ideology. King addressed the struggles, goals, and hopes of the movement with his speech I Have a Dream. In response, Malcolm X gave his own speech The Ballot or The Bullet, within his speech he addressed a specific topic of Black Nationalism. In both speeches, we find classic uses of rhetorical tools such as ethos, pathos, and logos. They speak with a purpose to an intended audience.
King and Malcolm X both utilize a form of pathos which works well to their advantage to draw in their listeners. In King’s speech, he mentions children, the unity of both white and black children. He also mentions specifically children attending school. During a time of segregation and
…show more content…
Malcolm X uses religion to almost discredit King and those like him, citing that their dual roles being intertwined are political. He dismisses his own religion as a Muslim, stating that it his private life and has no sway on his public life. On the other hand, King’s speech is ingrained with religious references and tone. His speech is sermon-like and speaks volumes on his position as a Reverend within the Christian Church. Their stances on segregation are vastly different. King is a staunch supporter of integration in schools, businesses, and the country in general while Malcolm is against integration because it gives up control within the black community. Malcolm's focus is Black Nationalism. The goal of Black Nationalism is to give Blacks control within their own communities. One noticeable difference is their tones and how they address not only their audience but how they refer to their own community. King uses the term Negro while Malcolm refers to those within his community as
Malcolm acknowledges his fellow people by saying “All of us have suffered here, in this country, political oppression by the hands of a white man, economic exploitation at the hands of a white man, and social degradation at the hands of the white man". Malcolm X's integrity and propaganda regrading every black male and women's issue. Malcolm's speech in fact did pave the way for blacks to have that freedom. The Ballot or the Bullet rather insinuates ethos logos, and pathos throughout the speech with creditability, logical evidence, and Malcolm's tone.
The choices of his words make Martin Luther King’s speech lean towards using pathos with words and symbols relating to everyone using emotion. Martin Luther king continues to use pathos in his speech with the symbolism like joining of hands as if everyone is family and uniting. Whereas Malcolm X uses religion and symbolism to get his view across to segregate the races. As X tells his audience that white people are of a devil race and not of his god and uses biblical references to Noah's Ark. With delivering his speech with intent of segregation by pointing out how sinners didn’t listen to Noah, metaphorically saying that white people are the sinners. He speaks to his audience with logos as he will quote using his mentor
Perhaps the most prominent similarity between King's and Malcolm's speeches is the use of pathos. They appealed to the audience's emotions to persuade their audience to join their movement and concede their beliefs. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X both spoke in a way that brought fear, pity, and sadness out of their audience by speaking of the evil of segregation and slavery. In his “I Have a Dream” speech, King used words and phrases with negative connotations such as "crippled", "languished", and "unspeakable horrors" to convey how difficult it is for an African-American person to live in a racially unjust society. He uses these words so people of other races will empathize with the hardships of black citizens.
King who percieved Malcolm’s notions as dangerous and violent by accusing the Nation of Islam of spreading hatred across the country between blacks and whites, insisting on “loving our white brothers”. For example, he describes his subsequent growing disillusionment with the church and its teachings. He describes at length how that disillusionment simultaneously deepened and broadened as he became older, detailing what he sees as the church's hypocrisies, developing theories about how those hypocrisies affected and continue to affect American life. He suggests that the only way America can become what it has the potential to become is to
While King had focused on loving our enemies, Malcolm X called us back to ourselves, acknowledging that taking care of blackness was our central responsibility. Even though King talked about the importance of black self-love, he talked more about loving our
The Civil Rights Movement inspired racial harmony between blacks and whites in America. The Movement was led by many leaders and activists. Some of the biggest leaders/activists were Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. They both had different philosophies on how to earn freedom and civil rights. The big question is whose philosophy was better in the 1960s. Martin Luther King believed that blacks and whites should join together as one country, but the only way to achieve that was through nonviolence.
Since he is talking to an entirely different audience where his religious beliefs may not be in-line theirs, it wouldn’t be ideal to discuss their different beliefs and instead uses Kairos to infuse his argument with logos to convince the audience of the problems with segregation and the necessity to fight for equality. Malcolm X discusses how they don’t have civil rights which were pertinent in the lives of all the audience and allows them to relate to the time and logically leads to supporting his ideas against segregation. Malcolm X denounces the actions of the white population, without any attempts to appeal to them; his approach to the civil rights issue is in complete opposition to the tactics of other civil rights leaders of his time, such as MLK. Rather than trying to integrate the black community into the white, he focused on the complete reconstruction between the two populations: he didn 't want the African-Americans to integrate into the white hotels; he wanted African-Americans to own the hotels. He believed that it was entirely necessary for the black population to break the psychological, cultural, economic, and political dependency of their oppressors.
When Worlds Collide: A Comparison between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X’s approaches to the Civil Rights Movement influenced by their childhood years, religious beliefs, and starts as leaders in Civil Rights. Introduction Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two distinguished figures in the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. Despite having devoted their lives to producing prolific advances to the political climate of the Civil Rights Movement, King and Malcolm X had distinct opposing views. King heavily believed in desegregation and integration through the means of non-violence whereas Malcolm X had a more radical perspective, pushing for separation by any means necessary, including violence. The polarising approaches of King
Unlike other black activists of the time, Malcolm's perspective was coined as controversial because he, like his enemy on the other side of the civil rights war, believed in a segregated America. “Only, you think that integration will get you freedom; I think that separation will get me freedom. We both got the same objective, we just got different ways of getting' at it. ”(Malcolm X.) He states this because his point since the start was to push Black nationalism, in fact he shamed any African American who didn't follow the philosophy of black nationalism “This is a philosophy that eliminates the necessity for division and argument, 'cause if you're black, you should be thinking black.
Martin Luther King Jr. was an important figure in gaining civil rights throughout the 1960’s and he’s very deserving of that title as seen in both his “I Have a Dream” speech and his “Letter from Birmingham Jail” letter. In both of these writings Dr. King uses logos - logical persuasion - and pathos - emotional appeal - to change the opinions of people who were for segregation and against civil rights. Although King was arrested for a nonviolent protest, he still found a way to justify his actions with the use of logos and pathos. MLK uses both ways to gain the attention and agreement of the audience but, he uses pathos not just more, but in a more relatable way in order to appeal to his audience.
On August 28, 1963 Martin Luther King Jr. delivered a famous speech during the March on Washington for Jobs and freedom, this speech was called “I have a dream.” This speech was focused on ending racism and equal rights for African Americans during the civil rights movement. He displays a great amount of pathos, logos, and ethos in his speech. Martin Luther King Jr. displays pathos by targeting the audience’s emotion by talking about his American dream that could also be other peoples too. He shows logos by giving a sense of hope to the people that better things will come in time.
MLK’s “I have a dream” speech promoted the idea of integration. He believed that the races were created equal and that blacks should be respected as American citizens. Malcolm X followed Muslim principles and believed that he would protest “by any means necessary.” He would do whatever needed in order to obtain freedom for African-Americans whether it be violence or nonviolent. Malcolm opposed integration and believed that blacks needed to fend for themselves in the fight against whites.
On August 28th, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr gave us one of one of the most rhetorically moving speeches ever given. Titled as the “I Have a Dream Speech,” he read this speech to the “March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom”. As a civil right mover he gave this great speech to all Americans (black and white) so that he could give off the idea of equality on the same level. Because of his crowd of mix races King made sure to make his speech imploring to all no matter what the race that they may be. He uses metaphorical imagery, powerful diction,and symbolism to create an impact on the audience.
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two influential men who served as important figures for the Civil Rights Movement. The two men came from diverse backgrounds and had contrasting views in life about religion and African American’s stance in society. Malcolm X was born in Nebraska and had great amounts of exposure to racism. Martin Luther King was born in an educated family in Atlanta, where he experienced racism, but to a lower extreme than Malcolm X. Although they passed away long time ago, they continue to live on today in a world independent of segregation. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X used opposing principles to achieve equality for blacks; King utilized integration of both races and nonviolence as opposed to Malcolm X who separated the same races and employed non violence so as to achieve the same goal.
Also with this X is trying to make his audience appeal to his reasons for blaming the white men. Another similarity in the two speeches is when X says “I myself am a minister, not a Christian minister, but a Muslim minister.” This is just like what King did in his letter with bringing up religion. However the slight contrast is how King appeals to his audiences religious beliefs but X says “I'm not here tonight to discuss my religion.”