The wise Martin Luther King once said, “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” (“Martin” Brainy). Martin Luther King was a very persistent person that saw all of the effects of racism, and was well know for his civil disobedience activities that helped him change the way others looked at racism. Martin Luther King, Jr’s involvement in civil disobedience was due to personal influences, he chose to participate in civil disobedience to protest racial inequality, and he did achieve success using this controversial method of standing up for what he strongly believes to be right. Civil disobedience is when a person or group protest a law …show more content…
Civil disobedience is an effective way to make people notice the unfair laws and to change unjust laws and protecting peoples rights (Starr). To understand Martin Luther King, Jr.’s role in civil disobedience, one must first have knowledge of his personal life. MLK was born on Tuesday, January 15, 1929 in his family home in Atlanta, Georgia. He lived with his parents, Reverend Martin Luther King Sr. and Alberta Williams King, his grandparents and two siblings. (“Martin” Childhood). Originally born as Michael King, Jr., Martin Luther King Jr. was the middle child of Michael King Sr. and Alberta Williams King. The King and Williams families were imbedded in rural Georgia (“Martin”). MLK scored so
By analyzing statements of Dr. King’s word, his words shows very powerful message across the nations because his strong words motivated people to choose right path and fight for their rights. He states that the person, who breaks laws through non-violence, shows the greatest respect for the laws. By his statement, I believed that Dr. King. trying to shows an individual who follows the rule of civil disobedience will greatly shows the respect for laws; even though an individual will punish by the worse consequences. A person who has to willing to accept the result from the direct actions, self-purification. Negotiation, than she /he will be loyal to the rules
Martin Lither King however, viewed civil disobedience as a method in which repressed individuals join together in the means of fighting against un just laws.
Through peaceful demonstration, King tried to bring change in the society. In the past, colored people have waited for more than 340 years to declare their freedom, said King. Martin Luther King’s desire is to see all human kinds to be respect and love one another. The segregation create huge wall between colored and other people so he wants to narrow the gap. When colored people wants to go the hotel or other places, the owners wouldn’t allow them to enter into their premises so he wants the next generation entitled to work, go to school, or to do anything equally with white people.
During the late 1950s and 1960s the southern states in America were segregated. Black and white people were separated from bathrooms to schools and therefore, blacks had to use their installments or they would be punished by whites. While this was happening, two African American men, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, wanted segregation to come to an end. So they proclaimed their ideas and started to form groups to protest against segregation in America. Consequently, Martin Luther King Jr’s civil rights philosophy made the most sense during the 1960s because integrated schools was the goal, nonviolence could have a huge impact on the enemy and nonviolence was the only practical strategy.
Martin Luther King Jr realised the discrimination against Black people of America and he wanted to make an alteration to the way that Blacks were mistreated. Up to now people had been campaigning for Black Americans rights, to secure equality for all Americans. Although these civil rights activists had been successful in their intention to some degree, however racism still pursued through America. Seeing how activists had
In Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s letter to fellow clergy after he was arrested for civil disobedience in Birmingham, Alabama, Dr. Martin Luther King not only talks about his views on the reaction of people who are considered lower class but ones who also have a higher rank. Dr. King explains that he believes that there were many unjust reasons that he was placed in jail, but also understood his consequences of his actions. We as Americans not only African Americans but all races from then to this day and age now still commend and respect all of the sacrifices Dr. King made. Although today he would be disappointed as we witness everything he fought for arise again at this time. Dr. King described the difference between just and unjust laws
Martin Luther King Jr has sacrificed his life to create equal rights for persons of colors. In his early years, he had a friend named Alfred, one day King decided to go to his friend’s house. When he did, he was greeted by a white man who said they his son could not play with him because he was colored person. This is the first time King ever experienced segregation. Throughout his life, Martin Luther King had been subject to racism and segregation, he lived in an era where slavery was abolished, but not all thought white and persons of colors were the same.
In order to achieve true freedom one must discover that you can break unjust laws through peaceful protest. In “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and “The Speech at The March Washington” by Josephine Baker each article passionately argues about the disadvantages of the black community, the equality and power of education. We must learn to act with patients and not guns we must protect are self’s with a pen and paper not violence. Dr. King once4 said “Nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon. It is unique in history which cuts without wounding and ennobles the man who wields it.
During this day I believe that I would take up Martin Luther King's view on civil disobedience as my own because I see just how he said that not all laws that are legal are just. I believe that not all that is made law is just for all people but only make it just for the majority. King view on civil disobedience is more suitable for this day and age that why people would try to follow his example if they would have to take up civil disobedience.
In 1963 Martin Luther King Jr. was sent to jail because of a peaceful protest, protesting treatments of blacks in Birmingham. Before the protest a court ordered that protests couldn’t be held in Birmingham. While being held in Birmingham, King wrote what came to be known as the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” Not even King himself could predict how much of an impact this letter would have on the Civil Rights Movement. In the letter kind defended Kings beliefs on Nonviolent Protests, King also counters the accusations of him breaking laws by categorizing segregation laws into just and unjust laws. King uses this principle to help persuade others to join him in his acts of civil disobedience.
Page 4 of 5 Graded AssignmentResearch Paper Final Draft(200 points)A Closer Look at Martin Luther King Jr. Martin Luther King Jr. was not only an important person in getting equal rights to black African-Americans, but also an important person in the beginning of America’s Civil Rights Movement. Martin Luther King Jr.’s idea of nonviolent, civil-disobedience is still used today by protesters to achieve their goal. The notorious Martin Luther King Jr. was born in Atlanta, Georgia on January 15, 1929 as Michael Luther King Jr., which was later changed to Martin. Martin was the second child of Michael Luther King Sr., who was a pastor, and Alberta Williams King, who was a former school teacher. Martin Jr. grew up in the city’s Sweet
In the Crito by Plato, Socrates argues against civil disobedience, seeing it as an unjust act. Contrasting this view, Martin Luther King argues for civil disobedience against unjust laws, and seeing it as a responsibility of citizens. Civil disobedience is the active refusal to obey certain law, commands or requests of the government. I will argue that the view of Socrates is superior to the view of Martin Luther King on the justness of civil disobedience. Using the argument against harm, I will show that even if a law is viewed as unjust, you must not repay an evil with another evil, as evident in the Crito while contrary to ideas presented by MLK.
Civil Disobedience Compare and Contrast Henry Thoreau and Martin Luther King both wrote persuasive discussions that oppose many ideals and make a justification of their cause, being both central to their argument. While the similarity is obvious, the two essays, Civil Disobedience by Thoreau and Letter from a Birmingham Jail by Martin Luther King Jr. do have some similarities. King tries persuading white, southern clergymen that segregation is an evil, unfair law that ought to defeat by use of agitation of direct protesting. Thoreau, on the other hand, writes to a broader, non-addressed audience, and focuses more on the state itself. He further accepts it at its current state, in regard to the battle with Mexico and the institution of slavery.
Martin Luther king Jr. was born in Atlanta, Georgia, on January 15, 1929. He was the second child of Michael King Sr., a pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church, and Alberta Williams King, a former schoolteacher. Young Martin Luther king Jr. grew up in a wealthy for African Americans neighborhood, Sweet Auburn. Even he was a kid, he was known to be sensitive to racial injustices. When he was 6 years old, white parents of his best friend prohibited him and his friend to play together because of the skin color (Rufus Burrow Jr., 2014).
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “Only when it is dark enough can we see the stars,” meaning that hope can only exist when there is adversity. The quote was taken from King’s, “I 've Been to the Mountaintop,” speech. During the time this speech was given, inequality was the darkness and speakers such as Martin Luther were the stars. King and his words drove mistreated sanitation workers to go on strike, kept the civil rights movement going in the right direction, and pushed the fight for equality several steps forward.