ipl-logo

Marx And Durkheim: A Comparative Analysis

908 Words4 Pages

According to Indergraard (2007), industrialization is “the process by which an economy shifts from an agricultural to a manufacturing base during a period of sustained change and growth, eventually creating a higher standard of living”. Within sociology, the three founding fathers, particularly Karl Marx and Émile Durkheim, were interested in studying what the causes of industrialization and the consequences of it on the development of society. This essay will compare the ways in which Marx and Durkheim shared similar ideas about industrialisation within society as well as contrast the aspects of their theories which have different ideological roots and conclusions. The essay with then go on to conclude that whilst there were some key differences …show more content…

Marx, through his communist manifesto, believed that “modern industry has converted the little workshop of the patriarchal master into the great factory of the industrial capitalist”, taking society from one epoch of social stratification and forced labour to Capitalism, under which the inequality between the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat grew and became more evident. On the other hand, Durkheim saw industrialisation as a mainly positive occurrence which, along with the division of labour, provided the necessary institutions are in place to maintain it, as it causes society to change and develop and thus “civilization develops because it cannot fail to develop” (Durkheim: 1933: 337). Yet despite differences in their views of the effect, both Marx and Durkheim used the process of industrialisation to explain how society progresses and how society is held together or broken, with Durkheim, in particular, looking at just how much the structure of society changes as the division of labour progresses (Morrison: …show more content…

Durkheim identified this change through the division of labour which he believed would lead to anomie -the breakdown of morality in society- (Barbaris and Jones: 2011). Durkheim (1893: 276) argued that “the division of labour unites at the same time that it opposes” because though the concept of a division of labour rids society of simple mechanic solidarity, thus opposing the simple way of life that was found in a pre-industrialised society, by having industrialisation, it allows for the build-up of a new way of collective conscience. In a similar vein, according to his manifesto (Marxists.org), Marx also believed in the division of labour, thinking that industrialization made the dichotomy between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie much more apparent. Like Durkheim’s concept of anomie and the breakdown of norms, Marx argued that the division of labour encourages alienation leading to a feeling of disassociation among the labourers with the product of their labour, due to it all being monopolised by the bourgeoisie. Yet, unlike Durkheim, Marx thought that the division of labour would promote less autonomy and minimise their collective conscience, therefore leading them to think they need the support of their employer rather than their

Show More
Related

  • Industrial Revolution Dbq Essay

    448 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Industrial Revolution was a period between both the seventeen as well as eighteen hundreds, and was mainly acknowledged as a time of immense change. Throughout the numerous years, various inventions were shortly to be developed such as the refined Newcomen steam engine, the cotton mill machine, and most importantly, the water frame. These modern developments certainly affected the revolution positively, though after several years however, factories for these inventions were eventually to be manufactured. The factories in particular were privately operated by wealthy factory owners who required others to complete the complex tasks. According to the wealthy operators, the less fortunate of mankind were required to complete these hazardous duties.

    Read More

  • Marx Vs Durkheim Analysis

    1385 Words  | 6 Pages

    One contrast between Marx and Durkheim is how they think society coerces individuals to conform to its expectations. Marx believes that value and coercion is created through labor-time. For example, on the commodification of workers, he writes, “These laborers, who must sell themselves piecemeal, are a commodity, like every other article of commerce, and are consequently exposed to all the vicissitudes of competition, to all the fluctuations of the market” (Marx, in Calhoun, p. 101). Marx presents workers as victims of capitalism who are coerced to accept their wages due to the competitive nature of a capitalist society. Individuals, as workers, are thus coerced to accept the quantifiable, expected wages for their labor, and thus conform to

    Read More

  • Marx And Tocqueville Analysis

    984 Words  | 4 Pages

    For Marx, production is central to life; "…it is a definite form of activity… a definite form of expressing life." (Tucker:150). Mankind and therefore history progresses, as and when, these material productive forces come into conflict with the prevailing relations of production. In other words, whenever the means of production and the relations of production come into conflict, there is a revolution that alters the economic foundations of society causing the entire superstructure to be transformed. For Marx, “real sensuous activity” was the driving force behind history.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

    390 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the beginning of the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution caused a massive economic spike from small-scale production to large factories and mass production. Capitalism became the prevalent mode of the economy, which put all means of production in the hands of the bourgeoisie, or the upper class. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels argue that capitalism centralizes all the wealth and power in the bourgeoisie, despite the proletariat, or the working class, being the overwhelming majority of the population. The manufacturers would exploit the common proletariat and force them to would work in abysmal conditions and receive low wages, furthering the working class poverty. “The Communist Manifesto” predicts that as a result of the mistreatment

    Read More

  • Industrialization Dbq Essay

    1283 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Industrial Revolution was one of the most influential periods of our modern history. This revolution gave people the power of faster, quicker and cheaper ways of life. Since the launch of the revolution, we have formed mass production of goods, easier ways of transportation, and economic growth. While some believe that industrialization had primarily a positive consequence for society because of the mass exports of goods around the world, it was actually a negative thing for society. Industrialization’s negative effects were child labor, city life, and worker’s salary.

    Read More

  • Marx And Engels: The Three Main Ideas

    759 Words  | 4 Pages

    He argues that with all the pressures of class conflict and the imbalance of capitalism there is no way that this pattern can continue without a major revolution. Marx compares capitalism to anarchy, in the sense that there is no organization within which only causes chaos. The common pattern of capitalism is a boom followed by a bust, and that bust leads to recession and social unrest. This sort of fickle economy, Marx believes, will furthermore contribute to the downfall of capitalism. This socialist revolution would, “abolish private ownership of key elements of economy and change nature of relationships from ones based on marriage and property.”

    Read More

  • What Are Marx's Arguments Against The Working Class

    409 Words  | 2 Pages

    Marx saw the early technological rise as a possible collapse of capitalism, as well as the balance of power unfairly weighed against the working class. However, Marx is quick to point out that without the working class a capitalist society would inevitably collapse, bringing about economic and social change; suggesting communal ownership as a more equitable outcome. Marx believed that in time with the possible dissolve of capitalism, economics would evolve around communal ownership (Hall, Lieberman, 2007 p44). This is seen in modern society, through the application of technological advances for employment, education, and entertainment purposes, which may in the future disband the need for a human workforce. However, it is the same workforce that provides the capitalist with the purchase… it is therefore necessary for the workforce to maintain a level of humanisation seen through Freire’s methods of Dialogical conscientisation’ which are enhanced by Buber’s dialogical

    Read More

  • Communist Manifesto Essay

    532 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Communist Manifesto from Marx and Engels discussed the social class structures and the problems with it in society. Once the industrial revolution began it had a huge impact on society. There was an increase in production with the advancement of machinery and steam engines (Kivisto 16). It made the production such as cars easier but it lost the workers its autonomy as the proletariats were just treated as means to an end by the bourgeoisie. The proletariat’s have always been the working class in society.

    Read More

  • What Is The Communist Manifesto's View Of Capitalism

    1020 Words  | 5 Pages

    The development of the modern industry in which was built on the ideals and values of capitalism would soon rise and replace feudalism and the ideals and values it was built on. According to Marx, the rise of capitalism changed the modes and means of production. It also created conflict between the classes. As industries developed the modes and means of production changed for the Bourgeoisie. The industry became industrialized and the bourgeoisie became capitalists.

    Read More

  • Social Change In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

    252 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels uphold theories of social and political change being solely driven by the conflict between the owner of capital and laborers in society (Marx and Engels, 14). Some may argue that other factors include immigration, cultural beliefs, and modernization to name a few. In the midst of industrial revolutions, Marx and Engels contend that the bourgeoisie (employers) are taking advantage of the proletariats (wage laborers), and their struggle underlies all societal changes (Marx and Engels, 14). Other influences may motivate change in society, but ultimately the catalyst for all social and political change is rooted in the strife between the capital owners and the working class, which is supported

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Karl Marx And Emile Durkheim

    992 Words  | 4 Pages

    Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx both had interesting theories about societies. Durkheim and Marx found it important to understand society integration. Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx have played profound roles in the understanding of Sociological theory. Sociological theory can be used to explain many things including how society is held together. Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx had different ideas on what held society together but in ways their ideas were also similar.

    Read More

  • Capitalism: The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

    1055 Words  | 5 Pages

    This introduction of new industry causes the focus on a centralized city, where a few hands can build a vast empire of industry, while rendering the rural areas obsolete. Not only are the traditions of a nation put into question, but so are the values of a family. Because of the capitalistic world, children had been turned into part of the labor pool, and made the relationship of a family one of money. The final problem that Karl Marx points out is the cycle of overproduction that capitalism causes. Too much commerce and industry creates an environment of too much civilization.

    Read More

  • The Oppression Of Communism In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

    449 Words  | 2 Pages

    With the terms bourgeoisie and proletariat freshly in mind, one can now relate to the quote, “Modern bourgeoisie society with its relations of production, of exchange and of property, a society that has conjured up such gigantic means of production and of exchange, is like the sorcerer who is no longer able to control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by his spells.” This quote accurately summarizes Marx and Engels’ views in The Communist Manifesto, and it can be effectively analyized by identifying key terms and concepts, vital arguments made, and foreshadowing by Marx and

    Read More

  • The Causes Of Alienation In Karl Marx And Max Weber

    732 Words  | 3 Pages

    The third, is alienation from other people. Marx said that through work people will be able to develop connection with other people. However, industrial capitalism causes people to compete against each other than working together. Which causes people to drift apart from each other and the possibility for comradeship is lessened. Lastly, is alienation from human potential.

    Read More

  • Karl Marx And Emile Durkheim's Conflict Theory

    1145 Words  | 5 Pages

    Holly Kinsella 13528163 Q.2 Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim developed very different sociological theories of how society evolves over time. Marx brought around the conflict theory and became the head of the sociological discipline of Marxism. Durkheim was a French Functionalist, meaning he looked at society in a scientific way. Although Marx and Durkheim had different ways of thinking about society, both have contributed significantly to the way we study sociology today. Karl Marx was a German philosopher who became the head of the sociological discipline of Marxism.

    Read More

More about Marx And Durkheim: A Comparative Analysis

Open Document