Modernization theory had emerged in the wake of the Second World War as a development theory, which had state-led Keynesian economic principles at its heart. The western world believed that this model would not only be the solution to reconstruct European economies that had been ravaged by neo-classical economic policies in the post-World War I period, but also to bring developing economies at to a western standard. In the 1980s the world had experienced a rebirth of neo-classical economics and the state-led model of development was perceived more as problem than a solution. Nevertheless, with the questioning of the neo-liberal school, modernization theory has again begun to establish itself in today 's scholarship.
Introduction
"Modernization"
…show more content…
During the Cold War era (1947 - 1991), two versions of modernization theory were prominent.
Marxist view
The Marxist theory of modernization theorized that as nations developed, adopting a communist approach to governing, such as eradicating private property, would end conflict, exploitation, and inequality. Economic development and social change would lead developing nations to develop into a society much like that of the Soviet Union.
Capitalist view
The capitalist version of modernization theorized that as nations developed, economic development and social change would lead to democracy. Many modernization theorists of the time, such as W. W. Rostow, argued that when societies transitioned from traditional societies to modern societies they would follow a similar path. They further theorized that each developing country could be placed into a category or stage of development. Rostow 's stages of development are:
• Traditional - an agricultural based
…show more content…
Modernization is the term used for the transition from the traditional society of the past to modern society as it is found today in the West. Modernization or development theory presents the idea that by introducing modern methods in “technology, agricultural production for trade, and industrialization dependent on a mobile labor force,” the underdeveloped countries will experience a strengthening in their economies (Bonvillain, 191). There were many proponents of Modernization Theory, such as, Walter Rostow, W.A. Lewis, Talcott Parsons, and Daniel Lerner. They all felt that the rest of the world needed to look to the Western model of modernity and pattern their society like the West in order to
Gerardo Montemarano Mr. Powers World Religions 1/13/15 Chapter 15 Review Questions Modernization began in the industrial revolution and is defined as the advancements of technology and worldwide communication (Brodd 279). The effects that modernization has on society today and religion are huge. Whether it be the access of endless information at our fingertips or the access of religious texts anywhere or anytime, modernization shapes the world we live in today (Brodd 280).
Introduction The Cold War was a conflict that began shortly after World War II between the United States and the Soviet Union over their differences in ideologies (Koenig, The 1950's and the Cold War 1). The United States being a free market capitalist democracy, while the Soviet Union was a totalitarian communist regime. These two countries came out of World War II as the most powerful and given their difference in ideologies there was a rush to exert their influence onto third world countries to become the undisputed superpower of the world. Cold War gets Hot
After WWII the United States was a stronger country that was trying to use its power to bring about a new universal order that was based on democracy and capitalism (Schultz, 2013). However, the Soviet Union was not in agreement with this world order because they were in favor of a world that was commonly owned and a society that fought against authority instead. The viewpoints between the two countries turned into a struggle that turned into the cold war. During the 1940’s, 1950’s and 1960’s this war was able to form the United States in their politics, economic life, cultural, and social developments.
In this paper, I discuss how Karl Marx, Adam Smith, and Andrew Carnegie agreed and disagreed about the concepts of capitalism with different standpoints. For example, Karl Marx mainly focused on the function of communism; Adam Smith emphasized the free trade in market, and Andrew Carnegie adopted the form of capitalism. I further explain the different perspectives of capitalism that impacted on society, and social and economic situation. The word, capitalism, is defined as an economic and political system in which a country’s trading business and industrial activities are made by private ownerships or corporations through the means of production, distribution, and social wealth. In 19th century, as the development of Industrial Revolution
How unfortunate it was that the brilliant Bernard Marx of Brave New World, a man isolated by the emotions which are numb to the rest of society, is driven off the edge of sanity in an attempt to share these emotions. The tortured, misunderstood Alpha-plus man that wanted more out of life then to indulge in sexual ecstasies regulated by this “utopian” society was denied this throughout his life. At first, he was a subtle man, but then became a man that was pervaded by extreme jealousy and ego. Bernard Marx displays a vast amount of change, being introduced as the troubled character yearning for Lenina to understand him and his humanistic traits. In an attempt to make Lenina understand something other than sexual desire and pleasure, he takes
Communism, to America, was the evil force which sought to illusion people into a trap of injustice and starvation. President Truman made high note of this, and his doctrine established it similarly; “the Greek state is today threatened by the terrorist activities of several thousand armed men, led by Communists” (Truman 1). The hate for communism was evident: red scare swept the country. This was followed by many things like spies, atomic bombs, and outer space—all of which encompassed the cold war. Economics, with the evolving capitalism pitted against the freshly made up idea of communism.
he first chapter of The Cold War: A New History begins by comparing the United States to the U.S.S.R. and talking about the similarities between the two. It also talks about Communism and how Marx deemed it necessary in order to build up the economy. Lenin tried to implement Communism in Russia. They were not quite ready for that kind of system, so Stalin tried to modernize the economy. The U.S.S.R. had more casualties in World War II, but things were not necessarily looking great in America either.
Preconditions and Contradictions of a Capitalist Society According to Karl Marx, the revolutionist and sociologist, there are preconditions as well as contradictions in a capitalist society. In this essay there will be the identifying, defining and the discussion of key concepts as discussed in the Tutorials and in the module of the course as Sociology. There will be discussed who Karl Marx was, the influences in his life, the theory he studies named Marxism, conflict and contradictions, dialectic thinking, Materialism, Society, What Capitalism is?, and the critique based on Marx’s work from others. At the end I will come to a conclusion to prove that there are preconditions and contradictions in a capitalist society.
To examine the Cold War consensus, one must discuss the Cold War. The Cold war was the tension between the United States, standing for capitalism, and the USSR, standing for totalitarianism and socialism, following World War II. Although it was not a physical war between the two superpowers, many proxy wars had came out of it as way to spread or combat communism throughout the Free World. The Free World, as the U.S. came to define it, did not necessarily mean free as countries were being ruled by military regimes and dictatorships, but free from communism(70). During the Cold War, the spread of communism frighted the American People.
There are three competing theories of the causes of the Cold War; the traditional theory, the liberal theory, and the ideological theory. In all three theories lie causes that could have equally contributed to the conflict, but only one is more convincing than the others. The traditional theory says that communists were at fault for the conflict. Communists, specifically Stalin, wanted more control and thus used his political ideology as a means to achieve his desires. Expansionism is a commonly mentioned aspect related the idea of the traditional theory.
Communism In China A. Communism First, we would like to introduce about the communism. Communism is a socioeconomic system that advocate the common ownership and eliminate the private property rights to establish a society without social class system, country and government. In this system, the land and capital property own by the people. It advocate that the difference of the labour will not cause any unequal treatment and it oppose to the prerogative.
From the time that World War II ended in 1945 through 1991, The United States of America (USA) and its once World War II allie, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR or the Soviet Union),were engaged in 46 years Cold War. The Cold War was not a fighting war, but a war of ideas (Capitalism versus Communism). In the Cold War the The United States of America was trying to contain communism while the Soviet Union was trying to spread communism. This all started with Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels who created a book called Das Kapital in 1867. The book talks about how capitalism would collapse and communism will take over.
The Cold War was a “hybrid” war between the United States and the Soviet Union that started right after the end of World War II in 1947 (Two Super…). Both countries had strong political tensions toward each other. During the Cold War, although the two countries did not battle each other militarily, as a result of all the escalating tensions, the threat of an outright war made all parties nervous. The two countries, along with each other’s allies, differed in their opinions on postwar arrangements, with the Soviets backing out of their promise in the Yalta agreement, they were more interested in the spread of communism in the post WWII era.
Marx and Engels wrote that capitalist globalization was completely eroding the foundations of the international system of states in the mid-1840s. Conflict and competition between nation-states had not yet over in their view but the main fault-lines in future looked certain to revolve around the two main social classes: the national bourgeoisie, which controlled different systems of government, and an increasingly cosmopolitan proletariat. Over revolutionary action, the international proletariat would insert the Enlightenment principles of liberty, equality and fraternity in an exclusively new world order which would free all human beings from exploitation and domination. Many traditional theorists of international relations have pointed to the failures of Marxism or historical materialism as an explanation of world history. Marxists had undervalued the vital importance of nationalism, the state and war, and the implication of the balance of power, international law and diplomacy for the structure of world politics.
The Communist Manifesto reflects the attempt to the objectives of communism, and the theory of this motion to explain basis. He argues that the class struggle or the exploitation of one class by another, are the driving force behind all historical developments. Class relations are defined by an era means of production. But at some point cease to be those relationships compatible with the development of productive forces. At this point occurs a revolution and a new class is created as a ruling.