Masculinity In David Fincher's Fight Club

818 Words4 Pages

In David Fincher’s, dramatic film “Fight Club”, Fincher develops satire to explain the masculinity of the main characters throughout the movie. Being masculine and or having masculinity, means qualities traditionally ascribed to men, as strength and boldness. Typically, men are seen to be strong, able to fight, have a large frame, and or be fearless. Men such as Arnold Schwarzenegger and Chuck Norris are seen to society as Masculine men. However, some develop their masculinity later than others. In comparison to men, women are seen to be more modest, tender, and self-centered. Masculinity Is the social problem that David Fincher attacks in the film simultaneously using satire. It all begins when two different types of men meet spontaneously. Tyler Durden, a soap maker, and Jack. Jack is a typical white collared man who is not content with his life. He is the …show more content…

This most apply itself regarding the disclosure to the relationship between the unnamed narrating protagonist and the character Tyler Durden, which is only revealed following interaction between the two as opposed to prior to any interfacing. This variation conveys the significance of context in fully understanding linguistic utterances. Palahniuk commences the novel incorporating the use of the first person plural pronouns ‘we’ and ‘us’ as the narrator transitions into his role as a character. Out of the unnamed narrating protagonist’s utilization of plural pronouns, circumstantial irony arises as it communicates a construal that transcends its literal interpretation. The author utilizes the lack of context avoiding the protagonist’s utilization of ‘we’, alongside the adding of Tyler Durden as a verbalizing personality within the chapter to coerce the reader to rely on their conventional image of the word ‘we’ as approaching multiple

Open Document