Mat 540 Final Paper
5 litres of 1x10^-2 Dodecylamin has been diluted to 1x10^-5M by adding accurate amount of water from the tap. To calculate required water amount mathematical equations given below : C1V1=C2V2 10^-2M x V1 =10^-5M x 1,000 mL V1 = 10^-5/10^-2 = 10^-3 M = 1,000 mL Here C1,C2; are the first and second concentrations of solution V1 and V2 ; are the required and current volumes. The impeller turned on and DDA, and tap water left to be mixed properly with water for 2 minutes. Approximately 150 grams of quartz added into the solution. Froth should not be stuck in the area where overflow speed is relatively lower and this was done by using a spatula. Attention paid to make froth collection almost waterless. The collection time intervals …show more content…
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Table of Results DDA Concentration (M) Initial Mass(g) Time Interval Recovered Mass (g) Cumulative Mass (g) Cumulative Recovery (%) 10^(-5) 160 0 0 0 0.0000 15 19.4 19.4 0.1213 30 9.6 29 0.1813 60 13 42 0.2625 120 20.4 62.4 0.3900 240 21.6 84 0.5250 2*10^(-5) 180 0 0 0 0.0000 15 33.6 33.6 0.1867 30 22.9 56.5 0.3139 60 40.4 96.9 0.5383 120 20.2 117.1 0.6506 240 16.4 133.5 0.7417 6*10^(-5) 150 0 0 0 0.0000 15 40.1 40.1 0.2673 30 24 64.1 0.4273 60 23.5 87.6 0.5840 85 23.8 111.4 0.7427 205 19.2 130.6 0.8707 10^(-4) 170 0 0 0 0.0000 15 42.7 42.7 0.2512 30 28.8 71.5 0.4206 60 26.3 97.8 0.5753 120 43.8 141.6 0.8329 240 14.8 156.4 0.9200 Calculation Of Recovery Data And Maximum Recovery The cumulative recovery means measuring quartz recovered at a particular point in time. Cumulative recovery calculates a certain recovery amount of quartz at a specific time. It is impossible to recover all material. (Rinf) Maximum quartz can be recovered Modelling Recovery Data Extrapolating …show more content…
Table 1 Results DDA Concentration Initial Mass(g) Time Interval Recovered Mass Cumulative Mass (g) Cumulative Recovery (%) Ln[(Rinf -R)/ Rinf] R=Rinf(1-e-kt) (M) (g) 10^(-5) 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 19.4 19.4 0.1213 -0.24 0.557470715 30 9.6 29 0.1813 -0.39 0.169301257 60 13 42 0.2625 -0.64 0.287418737 120 20.4 62.4 0.39 -1.23 0.427320455 240 21.6 84 0.525 -3.09 0.528564533 Explorated Rinf=0.55 Calculated Rinf=0.55 2*10^(-5) 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 33.6 33.6 0.1867 -0.286 0.242207344 30 22.9 56.5 0.3139 -0.54 0.406195492 60 40.4 96.9 0.5383 -1.26 0.592397947 120 20.2 117.1 0.6506 -2.02 0.716882124 240 16.4 133.5 0.7417 -4.5 0.747840076 Explorated Rinf=0.75 Calculated Rinf=0.75 6*10^(-5) 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 40.1 40.1 0.2673 -0.35 0.89643061 30 24 64.1 0.4273 -0.64 0 60 23.5 87.6 0.584 -1.04 0.170474179 85 23.8 111.4 0.7427 -1.74 0.308657862 205 19.2 130.6 0.8707 -3.42 0.511460529 Explorated Rinf=0.90 Calculated Rinf=0.90 10^(-4) 170 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 42.7 42.7 0.2512 -0.3 0.949711638 30 28.8 71.5 0.4206 -0.58 0 60 26.3 97.8 0.5753 -0.93 0 120 43.8 141.6 0.8329 -2.09 0 240 14.8 156.4 0.92 -3.45 0 Explorated Rinf=0.95 Calculated
Nt1310 Unit 1 Exercise 1
1283 Words | 6 Pages& { 2872(25$\%$)} & { 2499(22$\%$)} & { 5795(26$\%$)} & { 5100(23$\%$)}\\ $N_{\omega\to\pi^0\gamma}^{\circ}$ & { 4487(15$\%$)} & { 3590(12$\%$)} & { 1978(6$\%$)} & { 1721(5$\%$)} & { 5846(9$\%$)} & { 5145(8$\%$)} \\ \hline $BR^{measured}_{\omega\to\pi^0\gamma}$ & \textcolor{red}{ 1.07} & \textcolor{red}{ 0.78} & \textcolor{red}{ 0.52} & \textcolor{red}{ 0.43} & \textcolor{red}{ 0.73} & \textcolor{red}{ 0.61} \\ ($\%$) & \textcolor{red}{ (15$\%$)} & \textcolor{red}{ (11$\%$)} & \textcolor{red}{ (6$\%$)} & \textcolor{red}{ (5$\%$)} & \textcolor{red}{ (9$\%$)} & \textcolor{red}{ (8$\%$)} \\ \hline & \multicolumn{6}{c|} {\bf $\sigma_{dedp-sys}=\sigma^{av}_{rms}\times(1-\sigma_{fit-sys}^{rel})$ } \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption[The standard deviation $\sigma^{av}_{rms}$ in ${N_{\omega\to\pi^0\gamma}}^{rec}$, ${N_{\omega\to\pi^0\gamma}}^{\circ}$ and $BR^{measured}_{\omega\to\pi^0\gamma}$ for the different energy-momentum conservation constraint are presented] { The standard deviation $\sigma^{av}_{rms}$ in ${N_{\omega\to\pi^0\gamma}}^{rec}$ and $BR^{measured}_{\omega\to\pi^0\gamma}$ for the different energy-momentum conservation
Nt1330 Unit 1 Program Analysis
1580 Words | 7 PagesTo compute rho, the program GSC threshold.m de nes two non-linear functions root2d and root2r as in Equation (15) and (16) of [1]. Each of these functions represents a system of non-linear equations in two variables. The program numerically solves these two by two systems of non-linear equations by using the inbuilt MatLab function f-solve. Since the probabilities, PNi are numerical solution computed by MatLab these values can be very very small numbers. To avoid these artifacts, the program replaces values of rho less than l_t by
Pt1420 Unit 3 Lab Report
485 Words | 2 Pages75 90 Doc 1 1.31556 1.80357 1.80357 Doc 2 1.75182 1.87012 1.87012 Doc 3 2.13338 2.27178 2.27178 Doc 4 1.56941 1.0743 1.0867
Nt1310 Unit 3 Assignment 2
115 Words | 1 Pagesgen RHSB=4+(4/(50^.5)) gen out1=cond(meanaRHSA,1,0) gen out2=cond(meanbRHSB,1,0)
Mat 540 Final Paper
696 Words | 3 PagesAccording to the Bohr model of hydrogen atom, the kinetic and potential energies of the electrons vary as .......... .. and... distance of electron from the nucleus. respectively. where r is the The square of the wavefunction, y}, gives us the Absorption of a given amount of energy gives rise to a larger increase in entropy the the initial temperature. Orbital energies in multi-electron atoms are mere difficult to calculate due to the additional Select the correct answers from the following multiple choice questions.
Buggy Lab Report Essay
542 Words | 3 PagesBuggin’ Out (Buggy Lab) Purpose - To determine the motion of a battery powered buggy & use the data to determine when the two buggies would collide. Data - Position (m) Displacement (m) Time 1 (s) Time 2 (s) Time 3 (s) Time 4 (s) Average Time (s) Velocity (m/s) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- .5 -0.5 1.74 1.38 1.44 1.66 1.53 -.333 0 -1 3.03 3.00 2.95 2.85 2.96 -.338 -.5 -1.5 4.44 4.28 4.44 4.41 4.39 -.342 -1 -2 5.81 5.25 5.65 5.83 5.64 -.354 3.
Mat 540 Final Paper
539 Words | 3 PagesThe following shows the marginal revenue (MR) and demand curves faced by a monopolist. [8 pnts] For the following questions, refer to the above figure and assume a constant marginal cost of $2. a. What is the optimal quantity that it should produce?
Nt1310 Unit Root Test
612 Words | 3 Pagesof CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob . ** None * 0.650 32.562 27.584 0.011 At most 1 0.297 10.908 21.132 0.657 At most 2 0.171 5.824 14.265 0.636
ENM 555 Week 1 Assignment 1: Business Shift Model
697 Words | 3 Pages(0.00, 6.10), (10.0, 6.00), (20.0, 5.75), (30.0, 5.65), (40.0, 5.30), (50.0, 4.85), (60.0, 4.40), (70.0, 4.10), (80.0, 3.55), (90.0, 2.80), (100, 0.05) base_new_customer_WOM = GRAPH(Awareness_of_E_Business) (0.00, 0.005), (10.0, 0.025), (20.0, 0.05), (30.0, 0.07), (40.0, 0.105), (50.0, 0.135), (60.0, 0.17), (70.0, 0.195), (80.0, 0.255), (90.0, 0.32), (100, 0.405) impact_of_lost_customers_on_WOM = GRAPH(Lost_online_Customers) (0.00, 1.00), (100000, 0.99), (200000, 0.982), (300000, 0.945), (400000, 0.907), (500000, 0.847), (600000, 0.795), (700000, 0.72), (800000, 0.675), (900000, 0.63), (1e+006, 0.585) instore_to_online__WOM = GRAPH(Awareness_of_E_Business*Instore_Customers) (0.00, 0.00), (1e+007, 0.09), (2e+007, 0.18), (3e+007, 0.255), (4e+007, 0.31), (5e+007, 0.345), (6e+007, 0.36), (7e+007, 0.39), (8e+007, 0.405), (9e+007, 0.41), (1e+008, 0.42) investment_spending = (100-marketing_%_of_budget)/100*total_budget marketing_%_of_budget = 75 marketing_spending = marketing_%_of_budget/100*total_budget online_customer_loss_fraction = GRAPH(E_Support_Quality) (0.00, 0.74), (10.0, 0.725), (20.0, 0.68), (30.0, 0.56), (40.0, 0.35), (50.0, 0.255), (60.0, 0.15), (70.0, 0.105), (80.0, 0.065), (90.0, 0.035), (100, 0.02) total_budget = 20 Total_Customers
Correlation Analysis: Nt1310 Unit 6 Assignment 1
908 Words | 4 Pages-.334 Std. Error of Kurtosis .468 .468 The table shows that the in the data set, the GPA variable is a left skewed distribution of -.053 and a left kurtosis of -.811. The final variable indicates that the left skewed distribution stands at -.334 and a left kurtosis of -.334.
Biology: Photosynthesis And Respiration
593 Words | 3 PagesUse your results in Data Table 2 to support your answer.
Stoichiometry And Limiting Reagents Lab Report
1237 Words | 5 PagesThe actual data is the result on our experiment vs theoretical, which is based on the calculations above. I have also learned to pay more attention to draining out all of the product completely before continuing to test the experiment, as any small drop of contaminant can veer our results into a different
Acid Base Neutralization Lab Report
1001 Words | 5 PagesIV. Data and observations Mass of beaker (g) 174.01 Mass of beaker + NaOH pellets (g) 174.54 Mass of NaOH pellets 0.53 TRIAL 1 TRIAL 2 Mass of potassium acid phtalate (KHP) (g) 0.15 0.15 final buret reading (ml) 30.75
More about Mat 540 Final Paper
Nt1310 Unit 1 Exercise 1
1283 Words | 6 PagesPt1420 Unit 4 Test Paper
784 Words | 4 PagesNt1330 Unit 1 Program Analysis
1580 Words | 7 PagesPt1420 Unit 3 Lab Report
485 Words | 2 PagesNt1310 Unit 3 Assignment 2
115 Words | 1 PagesMat 540 Final Paper
696 Words | 3 PagesCyp 3.5 Psy/270
984 Words | 4 PagesBuggy Lab Report Essay
542 Words | 3 PagesMat 540 Final Paper
539 Words | 3 PagesNt1310 Unit Root Test
612 Words | 3 PagesENM 555 Week 1 Assignment 1: Business Shift Model
697 Words | 3 PagesCorrelation Analysis: Nt1310 Unit 6 Assignment 1
908 Words | 4 PagesBiology: Photosynthesis And Respiration
593 Words | 3 PagesStoichiometry And Limiting Reagents Lab Report
1237 Words | 5 PagesAcid Base Neutralization Lab Report
1001 Words | 5 Pages