ipl-logo

Materialism Vs Humanism

982 Words4 Pages

Question 1
Materialism is define as “nothing exist except matter and its movements and modifications”. The first problematic point is there is no spiritual reality. This statement explains why our society is so lost and confused. If there is no spiritual realty, then there is no God. Many believe that science is the solution for all the problems we have, therefore God does not exist. The second point is materialism philosophy believes human are the one responsible of giving our lives a meaning. I absolutely disagree with this statement. I believe that people find a meaning in live when they find God. Another problematic theory is materialism sees human as object because it believes we have evolved from Fungi. I do not believe that human are …show more content…

We should focus our lives on making things enjoyable. I not believe that humans are the center of the universe and this statement only prove how we are selfish and self-center individuals. Finally Secular humanism does not believe “in sin, except that of not letting everyone do his or her own thing”. This theory is very confusing because as a society there are things that we consider sins and morally wrong. For example, we do not let people steal just because they like finer things. There is a system put in place to punish thieves and send them to …show more content…

The first point made is “our personal thinking determines the meaning and purpose of reality”. In today society, this has become a very important issue. For example the government wants to dictate our lives and what we should believe in. but as God’s creators there are things we cannot accept. Being kind, loving and respectful to other is simply the right thing to do, regardless of your background.
In addition moral relativism theory believes that “we have no one to answer to but ourselves”. This is a perfect example of how our generation feels. We believe that our actions do not have any consequences. People who believe in this theory do not have a relationship with God. Also they do not believe in afterlife, thus we do not have to answer for our actions.
“There are no universal objective moral goods or moral evils”. I believe that this statement is false and as a civilize society there are objective moral goods or evils. For example when I was growing up, killing, stealing or lying were considered morally evils. Today, as a mother I teach my children the same ethical facts. Personally, I believe that immoral act is basically wrong; it is not made wrong because of culture or opinions.
Question

Show More
Related

  • The Dying Girl That No One Helped Analysis

    783 Words  | 4 Pages

    Society has potential to exceed expectations, however when simple righteous acts are not performed, it limits our

    Read More

  • Cultural Relativism Vs Female Circumcision

    102 Words  | 1 Pages

    Our moral beliefs indicate the kind of environment or culture we grew up in. Therefore, if we were born in Somalia, we would believe that it is morally right to go through female circumcision as a rite of passage. However, if we grew up in the western world, then we would not believe in female circumcision. We can therefore see the relativist 's argument of cultural relativism in this case, because if cultural relativism exists, then naturally, morality will also be relative. Additionally, to support his stance, the relativist will also argue that tolerance comes into play when it comes to cultural relativism.

    Read More

  • The Transforming Vision Summary

    744 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most surprising world view I discovered in the book, The Transforming Vision, by Walsh and Middleton was the ability for a follower of Christ to be open-minded toward other cultures that are different in their beliefs, practices, and values. The reading has taught me not to be so one-sided on issues, but to listen to others who have a different perspective than I do. We all come from different backgrounds and not everyone shares the same values. The book gives examples of how each culture practices their traditions and customs. For example, the Japanese value the trait of loyalty.

    Read More

  • Difference Between Christianity And Naturalism

    981 Words  | 4 Pages

    Instead the belief revolves around the idea that natural causes are sufficient to explain everything that exists in the

    Read More

  • Mencius Human Nature Analysis

    2266 Words  | 10 Pages

    This is a topic that has been debated amongst a number of philosophers throughout history, and in this paper we will be specifically looking at two chinese philosophers, Mencius and Xunzi. Although both of them are Confucian thinkers, they have seemingly contradictory ideas on whether human nature is inherently good or bad. The main aim of this paper

    Read More

  • James Rachel's Argument Of Morality Is Not Relative

    1070 Words  | 5 Pages

    In this prompt the argument that Morality exists is irrelevant, contrary to our thoughts and beliefs. Everyone follows a set of moral rules. Ethical relativists disagree with this belief because, they believe that morals are distinctive from each individual culture. These relativists as described are mixing up moral and cultural distinctions, or are simply not willing to completely understanding the cultures they are standing up for. There are two different types of relativism Ethical, and Cultural, that rely upon the argument of cultural differences, which have flaws that make the argument unsound.

    Read More

  • Cultural Differences Argument For Moral Relativism

    1178 Words  | 5 Pages

    Next I will describe the logical flaw with the theory of CDA, followed by one example that, with using the same logic that CDA uses, will show this theory as misleading. Finally I will make clear if the logical defect of CDA proves if the theory is false or not. The General idea of Moral Relativism is that the beliefs and/or activities of an individual, society, etc. are to be understood. As written in James Rachels book Elements of Moral Philosophy, he states, “Different societies have different moral codes”(p. 18) and that “if the moral code of a society says that a certain action is right, then that action is right, at least within that society.

    Read More

  • Materialism In Fahrenheit 451

    1525 Words  | 7 Pages

    Rather than bringing fulfillment, materialism instead results in exactly the

    Read More

  • Moral Relativism In Criminal Justice

    709 Words  | 3 Pages

    This is because of moral relativism’s take on ethical dilemmas, and the view that there are a number of disagreements among people as to the nature of morality. An act can

    Read More

  • Summary Of Philippa Foot On Abortion And The Doctrine Of Double Effect

    196 Words  | 1 Pages

    Philippa Foot presented a series of moral dilemmas when she discussed abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect. One famous problem of her was the trolley dilemma: “..he is the driver of a runaway tram which he can only steer from one narrow track onto another; five men are working on one track and one on the other; anyone the tack he enters is bound to be killed.” (Foot, 1967, p. 2) What should the driver do? Despite what he does, he will harm someone!1

    Read More

  • Materialism In American Society

    1147 Words  | 5 Pages

    Materialism is a problem in American society, everyday people go for the next best thing just to show off their possessions. People show off what they have, and once they get tired of it, they begin to go for the latest, cellular devices, clothing’s, cars etc. According to Tim Kasser, “People develop ideals looking at the lives of their friends, neighbors, co-workers, and relatives” (Kasser52). What he is trying to say is, instead of every person helping each other expand in life, everyone is in rivalry with one another. In order to make an attempt at fixing the American society, making it less materialistic, people must become and think correspondingly of a minimalist.

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Cultural Relativism

    1020 Words  | 5 Pages

    Every society has its own unique cultures in which people will have different ideas of moral codes. The diversity of these cultures cannot be said to be correct or incorrect. Every society has independent standards of ethic within their society and these standards are culture-bound. Cultural Relativism has a perception in which rightness or wrongness of an action depends entirely within the bounds of the culture. This theory opposes the belief in the objectivity of moral truth.

    Read More

  • Essay On Divine Command Theory

    1218 Words  | 5 Pages

    The divine command theory, utilitarianism, Kant’s duty defined morality, natural law theory, and Aristotle’s virtue ethics are the five types of ethical theories. The divine command theory states that what is morally right and wrong will be decided by God. Utilitarianism states that “Action “A” is morally right if and only if it produces the greatest amount of overall happiness. Kant’s duty defined morality states that what is important is acting for the sake of producing good consequences, no matter what the act is. Natural law theory states that people should focus on the good and avoid any evil.

    Read More

  • Ethical Relativism Strengths And Weaknesses Essay

    2607 Words  | 11 Pages

    (Luco, Week 3 Notes, p.9) Cultural Relativism is simply a combination of the following three theses: 1. The only criterion of moral truth or falsehood is the moral code of a cultural group. 2. A moral claim is true, relative to a culture’s moral code, if and only if the claim is generally accepted within that cultural

    Read More

  • Aristotle: The Ultimate Goal Of Human Life

    758 Words  | 4 Pages

    So everything that we do, every action and decision that we make is in the assumption that there is something “good” to come of it because that is what we are all working and living for. The purpose and the function of our lives is more that just survival in a physical sense but of having a rational soul which means using our reason excellently. The only way for us to achieve true happiness is for us to develop our

    Read More

More about Materialism Vs Humanism

Open Document