ipl-logo

Matthew Hartley's Legal Obligation

99 Words1 Page

In order for job/position of the defendant in relation to plaintiff to be established the defendant must hold a job or position that is in relation to the plaintiff in order for a legal obligation to be established. In this case the defendants Matthew Hartley was operating a motor vehicle in a grossly negligent manner, operating a vehicle under the influence and leaving the scene of a crash and killed the plaintiff, Mollie Mahowald throwing her 20 or 30 feet in the air. Therefore, the defendant does not owe the plaintiff a legal obligations based off the job/position relationship.

Show More
Related

  • Prison Litigation Reform Act Case Study

    1661 Words  | 7 Pages

    See Love-Lace v. Martin, 355 F.3d 766, 782 (4th Cir. 2004) (no respondeat superior liability under §1983); Monell v. New York Dep’t of Soc. Serv., 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978). In order for liability to exist under § 1983, there must be personal involvement by the Defendant in the alleged violation.

    Read More

  • Limon V. Case Study

    325 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mr. Limon’s mother retained Plaintiff to pursue a tort claim on behalf of Mr. Limon and her (collectively, the “Clients”) against the allegedly negligent driver. The negligent driver had an automobile liability policy issued through defendant Geico. Plaintiff alleges that its attorney’s fee contract with the Clients granted it a one-third contingency fee in “all monies collected” as a result of the lawsuit against the negligent driver. (Petition, ¶¶ 5.2, 5.3) 4.

    Read More

  • Joseph Dorsey Case Brief

    686 Words  | 3 Pages

    On Sunday, March 12, 2017 at approximately 12:07p.m, Client Joseph Dorsey was shot while leaving the Talbert House Spring Grove facility. Mr. Dorsey was leaving the facility at 12:07 on approved movement, after Mr. Dorsey left the facility he headed north on Avon St. where allegedly his assailants were waiting on him and shots were fired. Mr. Dorsey, was injured as a result of being the targeted victim in the incident, and was shot twice. Mr. Dorsey received one wound to the shoulder and one wound in the abdomen area. During the incident Mr. Dorsey, was able to run back into the facility after being shot twice.

    Read More

  • Hayden Vs Letitia Case Study

    676 Words  | 3 Pages

    The University of Notre Dame argues that they do not owe Letitia Hayden a duty to protect her from the third party’s actions. The reasoning behind this was that the actions of a third party are unforeseeable, therefore Notre Dame owed Letitia Hayden no duty to anticipate the actions and protect her. Therefore, Notre Dame is not liable. Holdings

    Read More

  • Kent Carey Case

    437 Words  | 2 Pages

    Brent Carey and Stacey Carey v. Indiana Physical Therapy Inc. and Stephens Connelly, P.T. Court of Appeals of Indiana, 2010 No. 02A03-0910-CV-473. FACTS Carey sustained injuries in an automobile accident for which he received monies from the original tortfeasor. The Plaintiff, due to his injuries, was referred by his doctor to Stephen Connelly, a physical therapist at Indiana Physical Therapy, Inc. Connelly preformed a manipulation technique, “compressions”” on the Plaintiff during his third session which caused a great deal of discomfort.

    Read More

  • The Case Of Conner Hanson

    156 Words  | 1 Pages

    In January 2015 Conner Hanson was accused of shooting and killing 18 year old Anthony Gabriel. After the car chase led to the shooting and killing of Gabriel, Hanson is be on trial in adult court. Hason’s attorney told jurors that Gabriel was the aggressor and Hanson was just defending himself. Along with Gabriel in the vehicular was his 17 year old girlfriend and Hanson’s 6 month old baby girl. Prosecutor Randy Sample then explained to the jury that Hanson and a co-defendant placed bandanas on their faces before Gabriel was shot and killed.

    Read More

  • What Criminal Charge Is Dave Most Likely To Face?

    1006 Words  | 5 Pages

    John was drunk when he was fired and may claim that he believed he was entitled to the property taken because he was not given the severance paid owed to him at the time he was fired. However, claim of right cannot not be used in this case because John’s behavior is illegal even if Pete allowed him to take the car, as driving under the influence is against the law and John was so drunk that he fell asleep in the car. Therefore, this defense will not work. PART (C) What criminal charge is Sam most likely to face?

    Read More

  • Who Is Robert Mcbride Ethical?

    136 Words  | 1 Pages

    A colored man named Robert McBride detonated a bomb underneath a parked car outside the Magoo’s and Why Not bar. He committed this crime under the harsh conditions of apartheid which created an environment where people of color did not receive the same advantages as white people. Without apartheid this crime could have been avoided because the interracial conflict between blacks and whites would not have existed to such a severe extent. Hello, I am Nadia Barcklay and I am arguing for the granting of amnesty to Mr. Robert McBride because he does meet all three amnesty criteria.

    Read More

  • Harmon V. Nesbitt

    294 Words  | 2 Pages

    We are here in this courtroom to see if my client, Steve Harmon, will be convicted of being associated to the robbery of a drugstore, and to the death of Alguinaldo Nesbitt. The robbery occurred approximately 4 o'clock on 175th Street in Harlem. The owner of that drugstore,who died from a gunshot wound, was Mr Nesbitt. Nesbitt was a hardworking man, a well respected man who did nothing to deserve his end. It was truly a horrible crime, but it was not committed by Mr. Harmon, nor did he have any in the crime.

    Read More

  • Laura's Law Case

    981 Words  | 4 Pages

    What if there was a law that could minimize, even stop all mass shootings eventually? “Laura’s Law was named for 19-year-old Laura Wilcox, who was killed in 2001 by a psychiatric client at a clinic in Nevada City. The state passed Laura’s Law in 2002 but left it up to counties to choose to implement it. For a while, only Nevada County did” (Dembosky 2). Laura’s death affected many, causing people to feel obligated to stop it from happening to anyone else.

    Read More

  • Howard Trail Vs Lesko Case Study

    448 Words  | 2 Pages

    The case arises from an accident which occurred on September 26, 2009 after Timothy Lesko attended a Gun Bash. Michael Trail claimed serious injuries from the accident. Timothy Lesko claimed that he was not the driver and does not know who was driving while the accident occurred. Procedural History

    Read More

  • Diane Pardu Case Summary

    696 Words  | 3 Pages

    On April 15th, Diane seems to have been laid off but, Andrew did not provide a proper notice of termination to Diane nor indicated that she has been terminated. Diane has an obligation to mitigate. Diane must try to find another job after being terminated but, Diane failed to search for another job which shows she has failed her obligation to mitigate. Diane Pardu should be entitled to severance pay of two days’ wages for each completed year of service, plus five days’ wages. When Diane has been laid off for more than three months, she can treat this layoff as a termination and claim termination pay and severance pay.

    Read More

  • Court Case Study: R Vs. Kieran Loveridge

    800 Words  | 4 Pages

    R v Loveridge 7th July 2012 Introduction Kieran Loveridge, the offender, pleaded guilty to an indictment containing five counts of offending, all of which occurred on July 7, 2012 in Kings Cross, a suburb of Potts Point. There are three charges of common assault, one charge of assault causing actual bodily harm, and one charge of manslaughter by an unlawful and dangerous act. The offender was in Court on October 25th, 2013 to be sentenced for each of these offences. Offender's charges and sentence For the third count, assaulting Matthew Serrao, the offender was sentenced to four months in prison, beginning on September 18, 2012 and ending on January 17, 2013.

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Turner V. Hershey Chocolate USA

    1045 Words  | 5 Pages

    For the reason that plaintiff could not carry out her essential function needed as a shaker table inspector job, the District Court articulate that appellant was not a qualified individual as per the ADA. In addition, the district court the reliable that appellant could not sustain a claim for reasonable accommodation, for the reason that any exclusion from the rotation system would make a danger of increasing the injuries for the pretender and the other table inspectors and therefore, would be arbitrary. In other words, was the case so that no reasonable jury could find that the employee was eligible for reasonable essential accommodation claim under

    Read More

  • Court Case Of Lionel Tate

    1858 Words  | 8 Pages

    “Politicians claim that the public has demanded “get-tough” policies, but this demand may often be a transitory response to a highly publicized juvenile crime” (Scott and Steinberg, 2008). January usually represents a new beginning, positive outlook, new goals and shedding last year shortcomings. This was not the case for Lionel Tate, who is the youngest American sentenced to imprisonment for life without the possibility of parole, at the impressionable age of thirteen. Lionel, who was tried as an adult, was convicted of the first-degree murder of his playmate who he viewed as his little sister, six-year-old Tiffany Eunick, on July 28, 1999, in Broward County Florida.

    Read More

More about Matthew Hartley's Legal Obligation

Open Document