The “Bureaucracy” written by Max Weber states the importance of the hierarchical structure and technical training of individuals followed by the obedience of a superior authority. The management would be based on the capacity and productivity of the employees or individuals in order to satisfy the daily operations of the organization. The necessity to include expert training in which the levels of authority and supervision would play an essential role on the management of offices. In his reading Weber mentioned important concepts such as the process efficiency, division of labor, and authority in the management and administration by trained experts.
The reading points its attention to the discussion on the technical point of view in which Weber
…show more content…
In addition, a trained individual must meet the required prerequisites, educational attainment and demands before entering to the employment. According to Weber, “The possession of educational certificates-to be discussed elsewhere-are usually linked with qualification for office” (p. 80). Similarly, Weber argued that individuals must take an oath before entering to office. The oath is them exemplified as a compromise of responsibility, loyalty, efficiency and productivity when in duty. In this way, individual would be allowed to hold a position as a “tenure for life” withholding the principles of bureaucracy.
Questions
Answer the following questions and remember that the readings may have explicitly given you the answer to the questions or simple infer.
How does the reading define organization?
The reading defines bureaucracy as a hierarchical, inflexible and rigid arrangement of organization in which individuals must follow the rules and procedures established in the office. In this way, individuals are entitled to loyalty by following the orders of superiors which eventually will allow them to increase their
…show more content…
The reading advocated for a technical behavior in which individuals must follow the rules in order to achieve productivity. Weber argued, “The official is set for a “career” within the hierarchical order of the public service” (p.83).
What is the role of public administrators in this reading or maybe according to the definition found in the reading?
The role of public administrators is inferred according to the reading lies on the shoulders of top officials which possess a high level of seniority, expertise and knowledge of the systematic procedures, rules and standards placed in the office. Individuals with higher authority have greater power of bureaucracy and therefore greater responsibilities such as coordinating and organizing the work of those with lower ranks.
Where does the power of decision-making rest according to this reading in an organization?
The power of decision-making rests according to the reading in those individuals with a high level of authority or those that hold a superior and top level position in an office. Then the individual who has the top rank or hierarchical position in entitled to handle the running of the office by making critical
Indicate what the Texas Bureaucracy is, how it is similar or dissimilar to that of the Federal Bureaucracy, and why? Bureaucracy is the system of non-elected officials administering government policies and program through the executive branch. They are in charge of building roads, the inspection of gas pumps, inspecting facilities for cleanliness, writing tickets, education, transit system operation, and being a game warden. The difference between the Texas Bureaucracy and the federal Bureaucracy is the CEO. And the federal CEO is the president because he gatherings appointed, or ex officio, and there are levels of both positions and corporation.
The idea of this is of course in the word leadership. The Army deems it imperative that a leader sets the pace and the example for his or her subordinates to follow. The second is to Encourage thinking. A fine example of why this is vital in leadership is explained in The intelligently disobedient soldier (Clark, 2017). In his writing
American society tends to tune into the belief that loyalty is not given, but earned. While this might be coined as the correct way of thinking, it strikes up the age-old question of what makes a person “deserving” of loyalty. On what grounds does loyalty become a factor of “if” and not “how”? Should loyalty be given to anyone? Do they have to do something in particular to get it, or could they just be a good person?
Comparison of Marx and Weber for their approach about state and society: Max Weber is one of the philosophers able to explain economic systems such as capitalism. He was born in Germany in 1864 at that time there were a dramatic change in Germany in terms of industrial so there were a transitional German period and that influenced by those changes happened. Max Weber has a specific ideology about state and society. In constant, Karl Marx was a sociologist who were born in Germany in 1818, his idea and ideology about state and society are revolutionary. In addition, he was influenced by Communist party and he worked as a journalist he wrote a number of books and articles about capitalism, state, and society.
In the essay, “The Peter Principle”, Laurence J. Peter and Raymond Hull argue that no matter what the job or position is, there comes a time where every job gets filled by someone who isn’t competent enough to fulfill their role completely. This article is extracted from the book called The Peter Principle: Why Things Always Go Wrong. With having every right to speak about the issue, Peter and Hull specified certain examples to convey their point clearly. Laurence Peter was a Canadian educator and hierarchiologist and Raymond Hull was a Canadian playwright, television screenwriter and lecturer. Laurence Peter also published The Peter Plan and Peter’s Almanac.
In Weber’s conception of power, the bureaucratic domination is required within the organsations in order to pursue the organisational goals effectively. However, the discussion of bureaucracy and post-bureaucracy still taken in the consideration in the generation nowadays. There is no right or wrong between the views of Weber and Foucault because it depends on how an employers decide to adopt a suitable organisation structure to fit with their mission and vision of the organisations. For example, Yahoo and Google may refer to the Foucault’s view because it is particular on the creative idea and innovation conversely manufacturing industries may refer to the Weber’s view because it is very particular on the results of
1. Does this case support or contradict Weber’s arguments about the monolithic power position of bureaucracy in society? Both cases, How Kristen Died and The Columbia Accident supported everything Weber described. Weber wanted to maximize efficiency as well as eliminate favoritism. Weber’s overall reason for creating bureaucracy was so that a new administrative system could be created that would treat all humans equally.
Leaders must apply the Army Values when leading soldiers because of the fact that it builds trust and a bond. The same goes for the soldiers, in order for them both to work as an effective team and to get the mission done efficiently they both must live by these values. Once these values are integrated in a soldier’s lifestyle, it becomes too easy to work as a unit. An example on how loyalty and respect fits in a day to day to situation would be, a soldier witnessing a misunderstanding with his or her team leader and a higher ranking NCO, the soldier knows that his or her team leader is in the right. The soldier shows loyalty by standing by their team leader and shows respect by approaching both their team leader and the higher ranking NCO with tact to explain the situation from their understanding and what they witnessed.
They are in a generation where they accept the logic of organizational power in short being a conformist. Even though a bureaucratic system is obvious in our government today we are still not made aware of it specially its complications and its consequences. Up to this date we still experience complications in a bureaucratic government also in a bureaucracy mandated business. A bureaucratic government isn’t all negative it has its pro’s specially being a well-organized government as well as a well-organized business organization. but in this paper were going to talk moreover on the negative or the cons of a bureaucratic government.
The German sociologist Max Weber [3] described many ideal-typical forms of public administration, government, and business. Weber agreed that bureaucracy constitutes the most efficient and rational way in which human activity can be organized, and that thus is indispensable to the modern
2) Charismatic authority; where acceptance comes from faithfulness to and beliefs, personal qualities of the rulers. 3) Rational-legal authority; where acceptance came from the office, or position, persons authorized as limited by the rules and procedures of the organization. According to Weber, bureaucracy is a goal-oriented organization that operates efficiently to achieve their goals according to rational principles. And also, according to Weber, bureaucratic organizations operate “sine ira ac studio, meaning without a sense of bias of favor, relying solely on a professional decision-maker” (Rheinstein, 1954, 190-2). Hierarchical bureaucracy is one of the key features and essential in an organization.
During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Max Weber suggested a set of principles for an "ideal" bureaucracy for large-scale organizations of all types. Through firmly ordered hierarchy of supervision-management and subordination, written records of management, expert training, and official activity taking priority over other activities, the bureaucracy management was envisioned as a large machine for attaining organization’s goals in the most efficient manner possible. Weber developed 8 principles regarding his Bureaucracy Management Theory. Principles of Bureaucratic Management Theory 1.
For in his lifetime, Weber was revered more for his political thoughts than his theories in management. In fact, Max Weber was part of a committee setup to draft the constitution of the Weimer Republic. Weber’s rise to prominence in the field of management is credited to two of his books: The Rise of Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, in which he linked the Calvinist morality (his mother was a staunch Calvinist) to capitalism and The Theory of Social and Economic
1. Define and distinguish scientific management and bureaucratic management. Theoretical models are used to identify the management of different organizations and how they are structured. The early classical school entailed the bureaucratic and scientific management models of management. Both of these models focuses on the improvement of the managerial effectiveness by providing tools and suggesting organizational structures.
A centralized structure is usually designed and has a formal layout. While in a decentralized organizational structure, the decision making control is distributed among departments and each department has certain degree of independence. It is usually emergent. Bureaucracy in an organization is based on single chain of command from top level to bottom level. It is the most rigid and formal type of organizational structure.