Weber’s Bureaucratic Principles: A Critical Overview
Introduction
In this paper, Max Weber’s contribution in modern bureaucracy has been critically discussed. Weber came up with the idea of principles of bureaucracy based on existing legal-rational authority in the society. His ideal type principles of bureaucracy are hierarchical structure, impersonal relation within the organization, capacity building of the employees, formal rules and regulations, management by written order and well division of labor. Critiques think that Weber’s bureaucratic model has significant limitation with its application in modern administration given that this model emphasizes on “dehumanization” of employees, process rather than the result, rules rather than
…show more content…
Though his principles of bureaucracy have utterly been criticized by different critiques, these still have great importance in both theoretical and practical arena of public administration. Some critiques think that it really worked well when it was emerged first, but it no longer works in the modern administration. The reason why they believe so is that the nature of work governed by administration of that time was simpler and easier to handle than this time, as in this modern era, every government is considerably facing rapid technological change, economic competition etc. Others also think that it is a system emerged by genius and governed by a group of idiots. However, there has been growing demands for significant modification and reforms of bureaucratic structure given that “it ignores the issue of collective interest and of the role of public power in contemporary society”. Before going to the further discussions, I would like to briefly analyze about the contributions of Weber in the development of bureaucracy according to a chapter (Bureaucracy) of his book ‘Economy and Society’ (1968) …show more content…
Therefore, their private business, wealth and other properties should be kept away from the official business. In other words, bureaucrats should have to be impersonal in maintaining their relationship with office. Weber’s this notion of bureaucracy has also been highly criticized for dehumanizing the personal life of officials. Hummel mentioned public officials as “mechanistic technician”, since bureaucracy considers their life detached from human society, emotional belongingness and all kind of personal relations. In other words, the concept of bureaucracy does not recognize human identity of the public officials that might discourage them in attaining the organizational
In Goodsell’s “A Case for Bureaucracy” Goodsell makes several valid points about the argument for and against Bureaucracy. Before reading I too would have assumed bureaucracy is a waste of time and that most bureaucrats are just lazy, rude and tend to hate their job. But now I've realized that Bureaucracy does succeed. People, Americans, tend to expect bureaucrats to be able to do anything. Even when the tasks seems impossible they expect the problem to be solved immediately which ultimately sets the bureaucrats up for failure from the beginning.
He believed that civilized and rich men can bring change in society, which will highly valuable for the Progress of the people. He believed that the change could be good or bad, but we should accept this change and stop criticizing the outcomes.
The Federal Bureaucracy is an organization of non-elected officials of government or organization who implement the rules, laws, and functions of their institutions. Essentially, Congress and the president create laws that are vague. The bureaucracy is responsible for figuring out how to implement these vague laws in our society through regulations, forms and rules. The Bureaucracy consists of 500 departments with roughly 2.6 million employees. Although, the bureaucracy is not actually a branch of government it does have influence over the decisions of the three branches government.
Paper Four “To be superfluous means not to belong to the world at all” – (pp 475) Arendt views large, superfluous masses of people as a necessary precursor for the transition from a totalitarian movement to a totalitarian rule. These masses, formed from the atomization of the class system in a society, serve several purposes which allow for successful totalitarian rule: they help to act as the popular lever by which a totalitarian movement may secure power, they carry out the rote functions of the totalitarian rule, and most critically, they are killed or imprisoned in droves as a means of demonstrating and employing the power of the totalitarian system. This final purpose, the continual destruction of random portions of the atomized masses,
The bureaucracy is a major base of power that can be difficult to control. Max Weber believed that bureaucracies shared certain characteristics: chain of command, division of labor, and impersonality. The chain of command is a form of organization characterized by a hierarchical structure of authority. In a military context, for example, the chain of command is the line of authority and responsibility along which orders are passed within a military unit and between different units. The division of labor is when work is divided among specialized workers in order to improve productivity.
He will promote men not through corruption but by their actual ability through merit. It also displays the idea of a government for the people by the people, all people contributing to government was another major enlightenment idea that was reflected in the reign of
Comparison of Marx and Weber for their approach about state and society: Max Weber is one of the philosophers able to explain economic systems such as capitalism. He was born in Germany in 1864 at that time there were a dramatic change in Germany in terms of industrial so there were a transitional German period and that influenced by those changes happened. Max Weber has a specific ideology about state and society. Inconstant, Karl Marx was a sociologist who were born in Germany in 1818, his idea and ideology about state and society are revolutionary. In addition, he was influenced by the Communist party and he worked as a journalist, he wrote a number of books and articles about capitalism, state, and society.
He despised the government exercising its power on the citizens, and frequently condemned decisions involving the use of such powers, as with the excise. (A) He believed that the central government should be given little power, while most authority should be delegated to the people and states. (B) The decisions he made often directly inhibited the function of the economy for which he aimed.
1. Does this case support or contradict Weber’s arguments about the monolithic power position of bureaucracy in society? Both cases, How Kristen Died and The Columbia Accident supported everything Weber described. Weber wanted to maximize efficiency as well as eliminate favoritism. Weber’s overall reason for creating bureaucracy was so that a new administrative system could be created that would treat all humans equally.
They are in a generation where they accept the logic of organizational power in short being a conformist. Even though a bureaucratic system is obvious in our government today we are still not made aware of it specially its complications and its consequences. Up to this date we still experience complications in a bureaucratic government also in a bureaucracy mandated business. A bureaucratic government isn’t all negative it has its pro’s specially being a well-organized government as well as a well-organized business organization. but in this paper were going to talk moreover on the negative or the cons of a bureaucratic government.
This belief supported Weber’s view on human rights; Weber implied that there was a relationship between bureaucracies and rights. The features of Sjoberg’s theory of human rights included focusing on the bureaucracy and the role of human agency in relation to it. Unlike Weber, Sjoberg went further into the topic and includes the inequality that occurs with individuals higher up in the hierarchy. From Sjoberg and his colleagues’ studies it was proposed that individuals are capable
The German sociologist Max Weber [3] described many ideal-typical forms of public administration, government, and business. Weber agreed that bureaucracy constitutes the most efficient and rational way in which human activity can be organized, and that thus is indispensable to the modern
He new that in order to gain control and remain social stability he had to push these strategies and policies through a dictatorial and authoritative style by using his charisma, influence, formal authority and
Merton concluded that the bureaucracy contains the seeds of its own destruction. This part discusses Max Weber 's bureaucratic model of critical viewpoints. It focuses on four main limitations that have no rational the bureaucracy in terms of an ideal, neglect, and dehumanization of the formal organization and a tense relationship with democracy. In particular, Weber 's bureaucracy does not consider an important role in the informal relationships that exist in any human organization. In addition, many in the areas public administration with the view that the judgment the bureaucracy is a threat to democratic standards and practices that govern and American
A centralized structure is usually designed and has a formal layout. While in a decentralized organizational structure, the decision making control is distributed among departments and each department has certain degree of independence. It is usually emergent. Bureaucracy in an organization is based on single chain of command from top level to bottom level. It is the most rigid and formal type of organizational structure.