Arguably McCandless represents the mainly American character through his absolute independence from society and his parents. He also displays some general characteristics such as being a hard-worker, continually optimistic, educated, friendly, frank, and non-family-oriented. Above all the individuality of McCandless, stubbornness, and ability to take risks is most representative idealistically of being an American. We value being different from others, believe in risking our lives, money, and honor for our beliefs, and commitment to our beliefs despite overwhelming odds and common sense. He falls short on being an American because although American culture usually praises taking risks they usually expect the risk to come with reward – not death. …show more content…
It is based entirely on opinion that whether McCandless in any way represents what is wrong or right about American character and as an American and growing up in America I am undoubtedly biased. Overall I believe his characteristics of being a hard-worker, optimism, friendliness, frankness, stubbornness, riskiness, and individuality are good, but the abandonment of his family and stubbornness to the extreme are bad. Because McCandless was American this journey and death became a representation of American culture however it wasn’t American values that McCandless felt the drive to do his Alaskan Odyssey but rather arguably it was human nature. There are people of different countries who journey into the wilderness alone recklessly or solo climb mountains without any gear, but we only take McCandless and use him to represent American
This passage seems extremely significant to the description of Chris McCandless’ journey because it emphasizes his beliefs and incentive to go off into the Alaskan wilderness. By further analyzing this excerpt, you can easily see Chris McCandless’ complete devotion to the idea of getting out into the world and escaping from the capitalistic government. Simply, McCandless wants to live for himself. The way he urges Ron Franz to simply move on with his life, "put a little camper on the back of your pickup, and start seeing some of the great work that God has done here in the American West" (page 58) easily shows the way McCandless is exceedingly passionate about what he 's doing and is very happy with how his life is progressing. The enthusiasm
An attribution to Jon Krakauer’s convincing overall argument is his thorough and plausible research formulated to create Christopher McCandless’s biography. Krakauer conducted a copious set of interviews with various people; he consulted specialists and scientists, and others in their respected professions. Krakauer also ventured in McCandless’s footsteps and studied into other adventurers cases. The “sources” Krakauer uses to devise his argument range from the people “close” to McCandless such as friends and family, people Alex (Christopher) met during his journey, professionals (police officers, rangers, scientists, professors, authors, etc.), those that found McCandless’s body, Alaskan locals, and letters from the readers of his Outside
Chris McCandless was a young, determined man whose goal was to escape society’s values that he believed deprived humanity of it’s true happiness. In the book Into the Wild, by Jon Krakauer he describes how people label McCandless as ruthless and careless for not knowing the basics of surviving in Alaska and for abandoning his family. However, McCandless was an educated, intelligent man. He wanted to live in peace in order fulfill his life with happiness he thought was correct. McCandless saw many flaws in society.
May people in this world are trying to pursuit their dreams, One person's particular is Christopher McCandless who decided to live out in the wilderness. He was a young man who was will educated and graduated from college in 1990’s. In the article “ Death of an Innocent ” By Jon Krakauer tells us about his journey and how he tried to serviced out in the wilderness. The movie “Into the wild” it explains his hole life style and how he decided to go out into the wilderness. I believe McCandless is a fool because he worked to hard to get to here he was at in life just to go out into the wilderness.
Individuality is still a part of America. Each state is separate from one another, yet they all come together to form something greater. This idea of mixing togetherness and individuality relates to McCandless because he wanted to be rid of the chaos of society, but before death realises that being united with others is a key part of life. McCandless searched for the chance to be alone in Alaska so determinedly that he forgot about the people who cared for and loved him. On his deathbed McCandless found the American dream by realising that he needs to share his experiences with others to create something better.
Confused about where they stand in modern society. For christopher johnson mccandless, it was all of these reasons, and maybe more. The question is however, is why. Why did mccandless leave his well-to -do family to hitchhike to alaska to simply “live off the land”? Why did he want to invent a new life for himself when he had more than was necessary?
McCandless was a young man who lived a normal life. Well to everyone seems normal, but to himself he was suffering, struggling to He suffer watching his mom get abused and facing unhappiness constantly. Because of this he lived what could've been a normal life, he graduated college,
But, most of all I would like to know what exactly was he thinking when he first started traveling. I specially would not judge him because one does not know what exactly has one lived. So after all I don’t think I would have overreacted if I encounter him I would just like to comprehend his point of the Alaskan Odyssey. In conclusion, Chris McCandless changed many life’s
In Into The wild, Krakauer narrates the last couple of journeys Mccandless had on his adventure to Alaska where he ultimately died. Mccandless Touched many people's lives through all of his journeys. Mccandless went on these journeys because he was confused in life when he figured out his dad had cheated on his mom. This changed Mccandless to the point he began to hate his parents. Mccandless had a lot of confidence in himself so he left on an adventure to find his identity.
This quote states that McCandless’s behavior is not completely unique or unusual. Though he obviously lives in a way that very few do, and particularly very few who grow up with the opportunities he has, the motive behind his behavior is not uncommon. This also reflects the idea that he would have been looked upon with appreciation and would have been considered a person who had accomplished something impressive. Because he died, however, many have criticized him, and have seen in his daring only arrogance and stupidity, when in reality it was probably mostly influenced by his crave for adventure.
Have you ever thought about explore the wild? Have you thought about going alone? The book into the wild by John krakauer is about a risk taking boy, christopher mccandless. He goes into the wild on his own, doing everything by himself. Christopher mccandless stands out of because he has an “ I can do it on my own attitude.”
McCandless in the April of 1992,set off alone into the Alaskan wild. He had given all of his savings to charity, abandoned his car and his possessions. Unlike others, he wanted to live a life of independence, free from materialistic pleasures and filled with nature and it’s beauty. In addition, McCandless shed his legal name early in his journey, adopting the moniker ‘Alexander Supertramp’. He travelled a lot to places such as South Dakota, Salton City before hitchhiking to Alaska.
McCandless and McCunn's ventures into the wild had similar intentions and strategies. Although, the outcome of their ventures were slightly different. Both men displayed a certain degree of common sense. They were both friendly, curious, responsible, educated and intelligent men. Having fairly average lives, with big aspirations for their future.
However, Jon Krakauer proves his argument that McCandless was not arrogant, foolish, antisocial, or crazy by giving examples of other young men who were similar to McCandless to show that his journey wasn’t unprecedented. He also proves that McCandless wasn’t antisocial because he developed personal relationships with Ronald Franz, Wayne Westerberg, and Jan Burres in such a short amount of time and explaining the many times that McCandless respected the Alaskan Bush. Krakauer admits that McCandless may have suffered from hubris; he was still a victim of circumstances. Krakauer proves that McCandless had an intrinsic motivation to discover and that he wasn’t alone because Krakauer too ventured into the Alaskan Bush when he was younger. The Alaskan Bush is a very difficult place to survive if one isn’t prepared for many challenges such as hunting for food or staying warm in the frost ridden
In his novel, “Into the wild “ by Jon Krakauer explains about a young man going outside of the society. I'm going to explain about McCandless attitude against civilization versus nature. I’m also going to be discussing his feelings about the government and law,Family, and friends. Chris McCandless wanted to see how it would feel to live outside the society.