ipl-logo

Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

1715 Words7 Pages

One of McCloskey’s first arguments against God’s existence is to discredit proofs. He believes that because that one can not use proofs as a secure basis for their religious beliefs, and as a result of this, they cannot be used to prove God’s existence. In his presentation, Foreman states that he does not want to use the word proof, since he believes that it implicates certainty, and that these arguments do not give hundred percent certainty that God exists. Although these arguments do not completely prove that God exists, they are still extremely valuable for theists’ arguments. Unfortunately, due to their inability to provide evidence that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that God exists, Atheists are able to present a defeater that would …show more content…

If this idea is used and accepted in many other fields, then why, according to atheists, is it unacceptable to be used in theism? The main reason as to why McCloskey is denying these proofs is because he is interpreting them in a way that they were never met to be seen. He makes sure that his view of the proofs only supports his atheistic argument. Another important fact mentioned by Foreman is that one of these arguments is not enough to justify the existence of God. In the cumulative case approach, one must combine all of the arguments to make a strong case which explains that the effects of the universe are caused by the existence of a God. McCloskey does examine three different arguments to prove his point, but it is essential that he analyzes other the arguments …show more content…

Evans and Manis argue that the creation of contingent beings is dependent on a necessary being, and as a result, there must be an existent necessary being to create them. Yes, a necessary being may be uncaused since its existence does not require an explanation, but that does not mean that the cosmological argument does not entitle it. Despite this argument’s importance, Evans and Manis do mention that the cosmological argument is only a small piece of the puzzle when establishing the existence of God. The authors contend that the cosmological argument “hardly constitutes more than entering a wedge into the knowledge of God” (Evans and Manis 77). If someone accepts the conclusion of this argument, then they should search for more ways to learn about God and obtain further knowledge of

Show More
Related

  • Olaudah Equiano Argumentative Analysis

    64 Words  | 1 Pages

    Olaudah Equiano made this plea. His point in saying this was to call out the people who claimed that they were Christians for their treatment of others. He is saying that if they are truly Christians they should not be treating other people in this way since God said that we should treat others the way that we would personally want to be treated.

    Read More

  • George Zimmerman's Final Argument

    384 Words  | 2 Pages

    I have to admit that Zimmerman’s talk was hard at times for me to comprehend. I would love feedback if I understood his divine argument wrong, because I have had a few discussions about it with my peers and many took away different views from his final argument for a divine being, and in this paper I will explain how I understood his final argument. To come upon the divine being of God, he had to eliminate all the other contingent and necessary options believed by other philosophers and scientists through reasoning. He explained how it wasn’t possible for their to be no answer for the cosmos, nor were any of the contingent explanations of science, philosophy, or an infinite past made any sense.

    Read More

  • Mccloskey Teleological Argument

    120 Words  | 1 Pages

    On the teleological argument, McCloskey’s claim that “to get the proof going, genuine indisputable examples of design and purpose are needed” is not reasonable. Why does one side of the equation need examples and the other does not, is not a fair assessment of a problem. There should always be examples to prove that each side is disputable or undisputable for the premise. A person can assume that a statement is true but that does not make the argument true and in all fairness why would that argument be considered true without some type of proof. The teleological argument is to show probability of theism, exhibit purpose of order, design and infer that the cause must be an intelligent

    Read More

  • Texas Argumentative Analysis

    222 Words  | 1 Pages

    Texas is a complicated state with profound roots implanted in restricted government power. It is a very conservative state that holds to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion. Governor, Rick Perry, within seconds of his speech he states, " millions of Texans…, are tired of Washington D.C,. trying to tell us how to run Texas". Just about every Texan, supports the restricted government in the middle of residents and state.

    Read More

  • Pascal's Wager Argument

    416 Words  | 2 Pages

    Atheists and thesis have always butted heads with each other on believing if there truly is a God and if so, should you believe in Him? Atheists are people who do not believe in a God or all powerful and all knowing creature, whereas Theists are ones who chose to believe in a God. Choosing to believe in God, being the creator and someone who is all knowing and powerful being, comes with some benefits according to Pascal’s wager. The fundamental idea behind Pascal's Wager is a Pros and con's list as to why one should believe in God and it shows positives and the negatives of believing and not believing. Pascal's Wager by Blaise Pascal is a persuasive argument for whether God exists, but there are many faults with the argument because viewing

    Read More

  • Goldstein's Cosmological Argument

    513 Words  | 3 Pages

    84). Thus if something being unable to cause itself means there is a first cause, which must necessarily be God that causes the universe. Goldstein’s argument instead argues that since the universe cannot cause itself (Premise 4), something outside universe must have caused the universe to exist. Goldstein’s framework is far weaker, particularly after her 4th premise, as it falls into a range of fallacies and presumptions. Indeed Goldstein’s framing reads as a simplification of the cosmological argument designed to be easier to criticised.

    Read More

  • Mccloskey Arguments Against Atheism

    185 Words  | 1 Pages

    McCloskey claims atheism is more comforting than theism. In a world without God life could be devastating, we would be doomed to death. God is the hope for mankind for love and immortality, if God didn’t exist mankind would not exist. There would be no significance to one’s life to become inspired to do great things. There could be a moral standard to prevent mass genocide, war and taking of lives if God did not exist in world.

    Read More

  • Saint Thomas Aquinas Argument For The Existence Of God

    871 Words  | 4 Pages

    The objection addressed the validity of the argument which had the premise 1, nothing is the efficient cause of itself except God and premise 2, a chain of causes cannot be infinite. The argument thus concludes there must be a first cause. This conclusion agrees with my thesis that Saint Thomas Aquinas’s argument formulated in the second way leads to a valid argument, which concludes that there must be a first cause and that God

    Read More

  • Chris Mccandless Argumentative Essay

    788 Words  | 4 Pages

    Chris McCandless was in his early 20’s, he was the kind of that guy that wanted to learn and experience life without all of the material things. He wanted to be independent from his parents and friends so Chris did something that would be insane for most of us humans but to him, it wasn’t. He went into the wild of Alaska for months, in fact, McCandless even thought he could make it out alive at the end of his journey. As a matter of fact, he was known as being a risk taker and enjoyed being out and about in the nature side of the world. Many would believe that Chris McCandless went into the wild to purposely kill himself; however, I myself believe that McCandless did not do it purposely.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Aquinas First Cause Argument

    1473 Words  | 6 Pages

    The second objection is the ‘Immaterial-Material Causation’ objection which questioned how an immaterial being can be able to cause material existence. The prove of the success of these arguments will therefore weaken the success of The First Cause argument. The First Cause argument states that “for anything at exists, there must have been something else that caused its existence in the past. There cannot be an infinite chain of effects and their causes, going back infinitely into the past.

    Read More

  • Cosmological Vs Ontological Argument

    1444 Words  | 6 Pages

    There have been an innumerable amount of arguments for the existence of God for hundreds of years. Some have become much more popular due to their merit, and their ability to stay relevant through changing times. Two arguments in particular that have been discussed for a very long time are the ontological and cosmological arguments. Each were proposed in the period of the high middle ages by members of the Roman Catholic Church. They each have been used extensively by many since their introduction.

    Read More

  • Pascal's Waager Rhetorical Analysis

    619 Words  | 3 Pages

    Argument Against the Argument of Pascal’s Wager In Pascal’s Wager, Pascal pioneered new thoughts and opinions amongst his peers in probability theories by attempting to justify that believing in God is advantageous to one’s personal interest. In this paper, I will argue that Pascal’s argument rationalizing why one should believe in God fails and I will suggest that even if one was to accept Pascal’s wager theory, this will not be a suffice resolution to reap the rewards that God has promised to Christian believers like myself who has chosen to believe in God due to my early childhood teachings, familial and inherited beliefs. Pascal offers a logical reason for believing in God: just as the hypothesis that God's existence is improbable, the

    Read More

  • Walter Sinnott-Armstrong's Argument Analysis

    2349 Words  | 10 Pages

    As a counter argument it is faulty, and ultimately fails to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the traditional God exists and has an adequate reason for evil. In a court of law, the burden of proof falls onto the prosecution to prove their claim beyond a reasonable doubt while the defense counters their position by establishing some doubt. The prosecution can be seen as Craig as he claims the existence of a God, whereas Sinnott-Armstrong’s atheism only exists in relation to theism. Atheism is a response to theism but theism is an idea in itself, independent of atheism. In other words, without theism atheism would not exist, as such without a claim made by the Crown the defense is not needed.

    Read More

  • Mackie's Evil And Omnipotence

    933 Words  | 4 Pages

    The question that is asked time and time again is whether or not god exists. It is evident that people hold different beliefs. It is evident that through some of the beliefs of J.L. Mackie that it could be argued that God does not actually exist. I find this argument to be more agreeable. In Mackie’s Evil and Omnipotence, he argues many points to support why it should be believed that god does not exist.

    Read More

  • Thomas Aquinas Cosmological Argument

    1784 Words  | 8 Pages

    The traditional claim of all Cosmological Arguments is defined as “something outside the universe is responsible to explain the existence of the universe” (PowerPoint 380). In the “causal argument,” or the First Cause Argument on the cosmological argument, “something” outside of the universe that is supposed to inform us about the existence of the universe is argued to be explained as God. As the first cause argument goes into depth and with the help of Thomas Aquinas, it is easy to see how God is responsible for explaining the existence of the universe around us. Within the first cause argument on the cosmological argument the following premises and conclusions are discussed: Premise 1: There exists things that are caused. Meaning that

    Read More

More about Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

Open Document