Good Morning everyone, welcome to my seminar presentation my name is Vincent and today I’m going to talk about Media and my focus is on whether or not the information contained on mass media platforms are biased. The term bias refers to the tolerance of personal opinions to determine judgment on opposing or supporting a particular party. The existence of mass media are separated into various different forms, however in this presentation specifically only news related media will be analyzed.
This presentation will argue that the information in mass media are not free from bias for the following reasons: Firstly, the existence of media bias causes provision of inaccurate information to the society And secondly, there a usage
…show more content…
(Parenti) also supports (Walters, Mair & Lim) with the theory that states although media misrepresentation may occur due to innocent error or common production problems, it does not occur randomly as there has to be a distinct motive behind it which in this case refers to popularity, profit, and fame.
This clearly shows that the ability of media outlets to create bias stories which can take various different forms such as sensationalism, are driven by specific motives which can lead to not only those outlets gaining more viewers and profit but also damage the reputation of the actor’s within the news.
Now, moving on to my second point which is Persuasion bias affiliating political affairs
[De Marzo, Vayanos, and Zwiebel] suggest that consumers of media are subject to media
…show more content…
Last but not least, I would like to talk about Media bias causing Collective Bias.
Now, what is collective bias? According to (Luo) when an individual outlet of news, report bias information regarding political issues, it may affect multiple other outlets to similarly reporting the biased information. Furthermore, this collective bias may also lead to what is known as collective failure which is the reporting of the superior issue being neglected from the news.
For example, a survey conducted by Langer Research Associates for the ABC news, reports that on May 2016 among a random sample of 1000 adults, roughly 70% consider him as unfavorable. This reveals the general perceptions of the society towards Donald Trump is fairly poor.
This statistics show the percentage of tone news coverage for Donald Trump’s first 100 days in the office by several various news cables, the result is that majority of the news cables all have a similar point of view which is leaning more towards the negative tone. A factor which leads to these well-known news outlets to have similar ideology could be the caused by
The Consequences of Opinions in the Media The media is a driving force and a major contributor to change in society. The information it gives has the power to sway the opinions of millions and is a significant factor in the views of the public. When the media gives its own opinions to the public about a certain race, group, or religion, there are immense consequences. In the book Indian Killer, the media plays a large role in swaying the opinions of the public toward a specific race.
This is evidenced by the growth of small, often internet-based, media outlets that target a niche audience with a very specific ideology. For example, the online broadcast channel The Blaze mainly targets highly conservative millennials. By having these highly specific statements of opinion, people can only choose to affirm their beliefs and make them feel stronger about them. Thus, when statements of opinion are misused, the public becomes more divided in opinion and less open to compromising with other viewpoints. This can be seen today as increasingly opinionated news reporting has been a major factor in the growing political divide in the United States.
The argument can be made that, instead of appealing to the lowest common denominator in the public, at least some media should give the more informed and critical segment of the people what it wants (Lazere 305). The people are considered to be the largest segment of the audience and that should be enough evidence for the media members to make the news tailor made for the viewing public. When confronted with said evidence, most media members blame it on education. “One professional consultant who pioneered these formats justified them by claiming, “People who watch television the most are unread, uneducated, untraveled and unable to concentrate on single subjects more than a minute or two.” (Lazere 306).
A different quote in this article states “The news media is extremely powerful, and that it can inject particular points of view into its audience. At the other extreme, scholars have contended that the media has minimal effects on individuals because of various mediating conditions, including their selective exposure to media they find congenial to their views, selective perception in accordance with preexisting
First, the media can easily persuade the American people to think what they want for instance; in the movie Wag the Dog they make the public believe that they really are at war when everything they are showing is fake (movie). “The vast majority of journalists at these major outlets are generally liberal” and so if they are liberal they will write what they think about the situation (Washington Examiner). By them doing that they get all the American people to believe what they believe. “Some claiming that there is no such thing as media bias and that the republican candidates were just upset about the tough questioning” which is really just another one of the writers opinions. If they
"Would you rather just sit there and cower underneath a desk while someone executes you and your friends or would you rather have a chance to defend your life? That's what it really boils down to," says Michael Flitcraft, a 23-year-old sophomore at the University of Cincinnati. Flitcraft has become a leading advocate and organizer for Students for Concealed Carry on Campus (SCCC), a grass-roots organization that was formed after the 2007 Virginia Tech massacre that left 32 college students and professors dead (Arena). The organization now boasts a membership exceeding 42,000 college students, professors, college employees and parents who believe that holders of state-issued concealed handgun licenses should be allowed to extend those rights
Murrow Political Bias in media is one of the most rampant examples of bias in terms of its influence on mindsets of people. The statement above by Edward R. Murrow makes total sense in today’s world. Political Bias is at its peak during elections. Public has to vote for candidates and much information about the candidates comes from media. Media, during these times, takes this advantage.
The central theme of media manipulation and the consequences of that are explained and uncovered in Ryan Holiday’s book Trust Me I’m Lying: Confessions of a Media Manipulator. Holiday offers a brutally honest insight into the world of PR and journalism, one that many people can have trouble accepting and one that makes us doubt every form of media and advertisement around us and exposes the twisted relationship between online media and marketing. In the beginning of the book, Holiday admits that he is a liar, but asks the readers to believe everything he says. As mentioned in an article published by Poynter institute, “He has a point to make, but he 's like the addict warning of the dangers of drugs, all the while snorting a line and shaking his head at how bad it is” (Silverman, 2012).
If one has a pulse, one also has a bias; therefore, many people involved in the media bear their own biases, and it leads to subjective news. Frederick Allen, in his article "Balancing Act," clarifies how the bias in the media remains the same as it has always been and doesn’t show any indications of changing. The overwhelming and seemingly inescapable bias in today 's media is no more simply tuning in; it 's assuming control. In particular, Allen depicts how the general society sees the bias "in different places" (44). Allen continues to address what number of individuals won 't go up against their own worldview; rather, individuals will point fingers at the "one we disagree with" guaranteeing that the other will "hold the biased opinion"
In America, Media bias is everywhere, in the United States all the information that an average American received through everyday sources, the news was most likely processed through the media and told through a biased point of view, when the media gets their hands on news if it is important then it probably won’t be talked about or downplayed no matter the source like in the newspaper, radio, television, movies, as well as other outlets that the media uses, the media only seems to share the news that they find interesting, even then the media would most likely have changed the story, in what they say is just tweaked news, what actually happened and what really happened would be two different stories, also the story would be told from one person
When thinking of the media you think they are reporting the appropriate and accurate information not based on any personal opinions and feelings. Also one would not think the media would be reporting based on one side of politics or the other. The media is extremely biased when it comes to politics and news. While some of the media is conservative-biased I believe the mass media is liberal-biased. Majority of media outlets are liberal companies, media personnel and journalists will identify themselves as democrats and liberals more so than republicans or conservatives and lastly the left side (liberals) of the mass media is persuasive on what information to report.
Bias is defined as being prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair. Americans experience some sort of bias every day, however, media bias is likely the most prevalent. Media can be biased towards liberals, conservatives, or any other political leaning. According to University of Oklahoma Professor, Keith Gaddie, the mainstream media mostly suffers from liberal bias - which is usually hostile toward conservative candidates and causes. Media bias can misinform, exaggerate truths, and cause confusion during voting season.
According to Baran (2012) mass communication can be defined as “the process of creating shared meaning between the mass media and their audiences.” This essay aims to discuss the degree to which we are shaped by our interaction with the media. In order to achieve the aforementioned aim of this essay I will focus on the following: limited-effects theory, two-step flow theory, attitude change theory and agenda setting. The limited effects theory sets out that media influence is based on individual and social characteristics.
Mass Media is refers to every medium or source which is used to connect and communicate with a large number of people at once. Mass media is communication whether written, broadcast, or spoken to reaches a large audience. This includes television, radio, advertising, movies, internet, newspapers, and magazines. Media help to correlate or co-ordinate various parts of the social system by gathering and disseminating valuable information. (Yeh.
The theory explains “how individuals use mass communication to gratify their needs” (Burgeon, Hunsaker and Dawson, 1994, cited in Udende and Azeez, 2010, p. 34). The theory holds that “people influence the effects that mass media have on them” (Anaeto et al, 2008 cited in Edegoh, Asemah and Nwammuo, 2013, p. 23). The assumption of the theory is that people are not just passive receivers of media messages; rather, they actively influence the message effects. Media audience selectively choose, attend to, perceive and retain media offerings on the basis of their needs, beliefs, etc., thus, “there are as many reasons for using the media as there are media users”