Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform
Allegations of medical malpractice by a physician has become increasingly common in today 's society. Although the legal system supports extensive research and negotiation between the parties to avoid trial by jury (Bal, 2009), the increase of court related lawsuits involving medical malpractice continues to rise. In the year 2014, medical malpractice costs, settlements and awards totaled 3.9 billion dollars with an estimate of over 4 billion dollars in the year 2015
("Medical malpractice payouts continue to climb in U.S.," 2015) Although several states have seen a decrease, many, especially in the south and northwest, have increased exponentially
("Medical malpractice payouts continue to climb in U.S.,"
…show more content…
For instance, a physician might argue that the injuries were not the result of their medical care and that their care followed their medical professional standards. Alongside challenging the element of negligence, physicians might try to prove that the injuries the plaintiff endured were a result of their own negligence ("Defenses to Medical Malpractice", n.d.). For example, the injuries a patient receives can occur if they do not inform their physician their entire medical history. As a result, they can be prescribed medications or treatments that can cause adverse reactions or injury. This is especially true in instances where physicians may try unconventional forms of treatment to care for their …show more content…
The cost of being sued, and the cost of malpractice insurance, greatly influences medical professionals (Braunstein, 2012). Healthcare costs in the United States are, in general, expensive. However, the cost of medical malpractice insurance coverage is becoming so expensive that they are starting to affect the practices of medicine. Due to this, many states have passed tort reform measures to limit the amounts rewarded to plaintiffs in medical malpractice suits (Hellinger & Encinosa, 2006). It is believed, by many in the medical profession, that limiting payments helps reduce the amount of malpractice claims. Supporters of these laws believe that such laws reduce health care costs by lowering practices such as defensive medical decision making. This practice, also known as defensive medicine, is common for some physicians to help lower their chances of malpractice liability (Manner, 2007). For example, Texas has experienced a decrease of 21.3% in medical malpractice insurance premiums due to tort reform legislation ("Tort Reform and the Effect of Medical Malpractice Caps," 2012). Medical license applications have increase to 18% since legislature enacted financial caps. Many physicians who have
Case Citation: Gallagher v. Cayuga Medical Center 151 AD 3d 1349 - NY: Appellate Div., 3rd Dept. 2017 Background: In this civil case Timothy W. Gallagher is the appellant, and Cayuga Medical Center (CMC) is the respondents. The case took place in the appellate division of the supreme court of New York, division three. The plaintiff’s complaint was that Cayuga Medical Center had asserted medical malpractice, negligence, wrongful death and emotional distressed.
I also think an out of court settlement would have been better for the defendant. Having a jury see the extent of Louetta’s injuries and then listen to her and her husband discuss that their life was life prior to the procedure certainly tugged at their heart strings and influenced their decision and the amount of their award. It was interesting to review and analysis this medical malpractice lawsuit and develop a better understanding of how laws and ethics are used in court for medical malpractice
From a personal examination of the claim, the ruling of the case was not satisfactory because an examination of the actions undertaken by the parent company would have proved that physicians were still accepting kickbacks. The laws should be amended to include all actions undertaken by the parent or subsidiary companies. The strict nature of the law will reduce cases involving
Atul Gawande is an American surgeon, professor, notable author, and writer for the New Yorker. In his 2015 article “Overkill,” he describes many of the flaws the American healthcare system holds. Throughout the article, Gawande intertwines personal stories, patient stories, and expert testimonies to make his argument stronger. Gawande argues, “Millions of Americans get tests, drugs, and operations that won’t make them better, may cause harm, and costs billions.” Or in many cases, he redefines over testing and “low-value” care as providing “no-value” care.
Is the American Jury System still a Good Idea? In the American Judicial System today, there is a choice between trial by jury or bench trial. Trial by jury is used today by selecting jurors from pools of people who are eligible, adult American citizens. Trial by jury is often controversial because of how the jurors are not professionals whereas in a bench trial, a judge is highly educated in law (Doc B).
It increases the demand for the services and word spreads of the physicians (Peloso,
The United States no longer posses the ability to effectively drive down premium costs through the means of insuring healthy people. For example there is a town with ten houses, and, on average, one house a year burns down. If no one in the town pays for insurance they have a 10% chance of their house burning down each year. If everyone in the town pays insurance they spread the risk because no matter whose house burns down no one will have to pay anything as the insurance company will cover the cost of the house that burns down each year and make a slight profit. This is the same logic applied to the whole medical insurance market.
The court found the “Defendant's care of Claimant fell below acceptable standards of practice” (Stashenko, 2015). In 2009 a former inmate of the Hawaii corrections department was awarded close to $1 million in damages for an incident in 2003, in which the physician’s failure to give the correct type and dosage of antibiotic for an infection in his scrotum. This resulted in 6 subsequent surgeries and the removal of his scrotum, rendering him
It It f It frustrates me what Dr. Anna Pou had to go through with the lawsuits of the Memorial Medical Center incident. As Healthcare professionals, being sued for making the rightful decision for the patient and the hospital is unjust. Healthcare professionals like Dr. Pou, have taken the Hippocratic oath, and one of the promises made within that oath is “first, do no harm”. Hospital’s should not be so quick to make such an important decision of pressing charges to their faculty; more trust should be placed in them. In addition, she made it clear her intentions were just to ‘‘help’’ patients ‘‘through their pain,’’ on national television.
In the film Escape Fire the Fight to Rescue American Healthcare, there were many insightful examples of why our Unites States healthcare revolves around paying more and getting less. The system is designed to treat diseases rather than preventing them and promoting wellness. In our healthcare industry, there are many different contributors that provide and make up our system. These intermediaries include suppliers, manufacturers, consumers, patients, providers, policy and regulations. All these members have a key role in the functionality of the health care industry; however, each role has its positives and negatives.
Health Care Law: Tort Case Study Carolann Stanek University of Mary Health Care Law: Tort Case Study A sample case study reviewed substandard care that was delivered to Ms. Gardner after having sustained an accident and brought to Bay Hospital for treatment. Dr. Dick, a second-year pediatric resident, was on that day in the ED and provided care for Ms. Gadner. Dr. Moon, is the chief of staff and oversees the credentialing of all physicians at Bay Hospital.
In this experiment, Wendy Levinson recorded the conversations of hundreds of patients talking with their physicians. Half of these doctors had been sued at least twice, the half hadn't been sued. Levinson could see slight differences in the two groups that were telltale signs of who was who. Doctors that haven't been sued were more open with the patient and listened better, even spent more time with their patients. while doctors who had been sued seemed to not feel as obligated to give them additional info to make the patients more comfortable and educated.
It is very clear to most that Grey ’s Anatomy is an inaccurate depiction of medicine and the healthcare industry. Though heavily dramatized and ‘doctored’, there have been moments of learning, especially with this ethical issue.
Some of the ways people get mistreated is things like misdiagnosis, unnecessary surgeries, premature discharge, not ordering the correct tests or not acting upon tests presented, not following up, wrong dosage or medication, leaving things inside the body after surgery, incorrect care in hospitals resulting in bedsores, persistent pain, or pressure ulcers (medicalnewstoday.com). Any of these or more can cause someone to want compensation, however some people don’t gain the money they deserve thanks to the fact that they either don’t have the money to go to court, wait too long, or don’t realize till it’s too late and the statute of limitations is up. Other times when they are brave enough making it to court they need a testimony from a medical personnel, however, they can’t find someone to testify (abpla.org). Usually most people don’t end up making it to court on the grounds that lawyers are expensive and the legal system can take a while, on the other hand, when a malpractice lawsuit is awarded there’s a great deal of money that the hospital’s insurance or the doctor’s insurance has to pay, the payment could be anywhere from hundreds to millions of
In tort law, negligence is harm caused by carelessness, not intentional harm. Proof of Negligence A doctor or a medical practitioner should not be held liable for medical negligence if simply something goes wrong. He shouldn’t be held liable for the chances taken by him keeping reasonable care.