History essay
Was the medical renaissance really a period of innovation and progress in medicine and health care?
Umang Sinha Myp4a
The medical renaissance was in 1400-1700. It was in a time period where the world had developed in many aspects. But was it the same principal with medicine though? After all, this was just after the medieval era where there was hardly or no development in medicine due to the dominance of old theories and powerful authorities. In the time, it was believed that the renaissance period would be the same as the medieval period. Their thought was that old theories were right and expected that no new theories would be introduced. Even if they would be introduced, they would be incorrect. However, there were medical
…show more content…
Andreas Vesalius, Ambroise Pare and William Harvey are three well known people for their improvement in medical knowledge. They made important scientific discoveries which changed people’s thoughts and also hold a lot of significance in the present time.
The medicine and health care in this time period was based on ancient theories by Galen and Hippocrates. This meant that the health care was based on the 4 humours theory of Galen. This is the theory that diseases are caused due to imbalance of the liquids in the body. This meant that bleeding patients and purging their bowels were very common. Superstitious thinking was very common as well since they wore charms to prevent diseases or to cure diseases. They explained diseases by looking at astrology and sins. This made them believe that diseases were caused due to the alignment of the planets and that god punished them for their sins. (Banham, Dawson, 70-71)
Andreas Vesalius was born in Brussels in 1514. He was specialised in human anatomy as he was able to improve knowledge. He studied in the university of Louvain and then moved to Padua,
…show more content…
Ambroise Pare was a surgeon born in France 1510. He became a surgeon in Hotel Dieu in Paris and in 1536, he became an army surgeon. Most surgeons learnt a lot from experience in war and Pare was not an exception. In the time, a common method to seal wounds was cauterisation. This implied the use of boiling oil to the wound to stop the infection spreading any further. When the oil ran out, the wounded kept on coming and Pare had to use a method of his own. He quickly used an ointment of his own and this was very effective. He saw that the patient he tested this on, was feeling better and the others on which boiling oil was used, were lying in agony. This led to Pare making the decision of not using boiling oil since it only causes excruciating pain. It leads to wounds being swollen which leads to patients falling unconscious and sometimes even dying. Pare was not only able to help healing a wound, he was also able to help stopping the patient bleeding. The old treatment was to use red hot iron to seal the blood vessels and hence prevent the patient bleeding to death. Pare’s new and more sustainable idea was to tie a silk thread around the blood vessels. This would seal them and prevent the patient bleeding excessively. The threads were known as ligatures and they were very effective in doing their job. Although this went against the belief of most surgeons, Pare had to do this because, the pain caused by cauterising was
With a 90% attributed casualty rate to the Minie Ball innovation, leaders had no ethical choice than to modify the tactics and doctrine for the current modern warfare (C}. The casualties sustained in Napoleonic style fighting using the Minie Ball was unacceptable by any means shown through the carnage produced during the war (F}. When it comes to the closure of a sucking chest wound, the procedure was adopted by surgeons across the American Civil War Theater as the way to treat the sucking chest wound (D). Anything less than applying the principles of this treatment would have left a patient knocking at deaths door, an ethical dilemma no surgeon would want to be in with an innovation proven to counter this
Back then the only way shooting a gun was with smokeless or black powder and the spent bullet which caused serious damage. His wound wasn’t sereve so they saw it not concerning and amputation wasn’t going to happen. Today’s modern medicine to treat a wound like that you would get a scan like an MRI or CT scan to see if any serve damage to the bone and soft
Many of the surgeons could be pushed aside by higher ranking officers, even though they had much less skill than the surgeons. His new idea was to make it bases on skill, so it did not matter what rank you were and it gave the more practiced doctors more power (Freemon #75). With this change it made it so the role that the doctors had in the army was increased greatly. Now that it was based on skill, they could continue to help the soldiers. With a larger role in the war, the doctors could do more and become a much more trusted and valued part of the army.
However, the wound was in the armpit an ideal spot, the arm was the limb losses, mainly in the war, and its more ideal limb to lose it than any other. (pg. 218). The surgeons and nurses in the battlefield would give men morphine sulphate every 4 hours to ease the pain and to help soldiers fight longer. According to Druglibrary.org.
What were the causes of Andreas Vesalius’ major influence in the field of anatomy? In Patricia Fara’s Science: A Four Thousand Year History, Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564) is introduced as a scientific revolutionary. Passionate to restore ancient knowledge, he followed the footsteps of Galen, stating that not texts written about the human body, but the human body itself needs to be examined for the best understanding of how it works. However, Galen examined animal corpses, because he did not have the opportunity to dissect human corpses.
Harold Gillies on soldiers. His first plastic surgery was performed on soldier William Spreckley. Spreckley was “admitted to the hospital in January 1917 with a gunshot wound to the nose” (Furness 2). Dr. Harold Gillies is known for being “the pioneer behind plastic surgery” (Furness 4). Gillies performed surgery on wounded and “disfigured soldiers” (Furness 3), which allowed them to continue living a full life.
When they would cut these people they would not get them any anesthetics. These people would get such bad infections, from not keeping the wound clean, that some would lose their
During the Civil War, the grotesque and gruesome injuries plagued the battlefield. Medicine was in its infancy and very few advances had been made. Even basic procedures and some techniques that common people are taught today, were not developed. The problem of only having basic medicine became a problem in saving the lives of the wounded soldiers. Surgeons were given very little schooling and were not prepared for injuries that this war would bring.
He thought quickly, and used a knife as a tool to pull it out. After, Cabeza used a deer bone to stitch up the wound in order to finalize a successful operation. (Doc. C) Because of this remarkable act, Cabeza became “famous”. The Indians now
Doctors are infamous for their unreadable writing; Richard Selzer is not one of those doctors. A talented surgeon, Selzer has garnered critical acclaim for his captivating operating room tales, and rightfully so. A perfect exhibition of this is The Knife, a detailed illustration of a surgery. What may seem like an uninteresting event is made mesmerizing by Selzer’s magnificent account of the human body and the meticulousness that goes into repairing it. The rhetorical appeals, tone, and figurative language that Selzer uses throughout The Knife provide the reader with a vivid description of the sacred process of surgery.
Often called the “Father of Anatomy”, Vesalius was one of the most prominent scientists during the Renaissance, along the likes of Galileo Galilei, Francis Bacon, and Isaac Newton. His accomplishments impacted the scientific revolution and reintroduced anatomy to the people. Vesalius emphasized that research should be done first-hand and compiled his own findings into a detailed book that was the first of its kind (“Andreas Vesalius”). The work of Vesalius was a turning point in history because of the impact his efforts had on medicine, standardized anatomical texts, and people’s attitudes toward anatomy. Andreas Vesalius was born in Flanders, Belgium in 1514 CE to a family of physicians (“Andreas”).
Including certain time periods like: The Plague which helped the europeans improve medication to be able to heal people. I learned great deal of interesting facts during this essay. During the Elizabethan time period people mostly believed in spiritual healing and not drugs. I enjoyed learning about spiritual healers and how people were treated during the plague. Not only did people suffer from the symptoms of the plague,but they also suffered from being split from their family and friends.
Maerker’s article presents a Viennese take on the utilization of Florentine wax models as surgical training tools in the late 1700s. It specifically addresses the benefaction of Austrian Emperor Joseph II – who (at the spurring of his controversial personal surgeon Giovanni Alessandro Brambilla) commissioned the wax preparations. The models were employed at the Josephinium military medico-surgical academy, which itself was a bone of contention, as it constituted one element of Joseph’s surgery-heavy health reforms. As surgery emerged from its layman, barber-surgeon guild status and became legally recognized as a liberal art, it faced hostility from traditional physicians, who were displeased by the comeuppance of “beardless bo[y]” surgeons,
So people did not think job of surgeons were complicated as physicians. People thought surgeons were craft and arts of knife and they were usually treat external complaints like boils and wounds by performed simple operations. The skills of surgeons were apprenticeship. The Barber Surgeons Company of London was established in 1540. Apothecary had parallel status of the surgeon.
The Renaissance was an era of rebirth. People were learning new things and it is considered the most important period of time since the fall of Ancient Rome. People in the medical profession were still learning about the human body. This is where the practice of dissection and body snatching played a role in shaping future society. The practice of body snatching and dissection during the Renaissance era greatly impacted the study of human anatomy.