Medisave is a saving scheme created by the government which helps the working Singaporeans and permanent residents set aside funds for the future medical expense which include after retirement. (Ministry of Heath) As many of us know that medisave comes mainly from 8% of our salary it is mandatory and it is a health care safety net created by the government for us citizens. (Medisave) We will talk about the disadvantage and advantage of Medisave We shall see how is it helping the citizens and how it might not.
One of the disadvantages would be 8% deduction being mandatory, despite medisave acting as a safety net for the citizens some might feel that it may not be necessary for all people. Though mandatory deduction of wages to medisave provides
…show more content…
They have their means of setting a certain amount used per year so that citizens can use their medisave the follow year and thereafter. This ensures medisave savings are conserved for medical needs in the future not forgetting for usage during old age. (Medisave) In general, the government sees that it should be sufficient especially when it comes to citizens being hospitalized provided if the citizen chooses to stay in standard wards of 5-6 beds or standard wards of 6-8 beds. The limitations allow citizens to plan for their medical needs be it near future or concurrent medical needs. Citizens will be alert and do proper planning financially and schedule for appropriate medical consultations or screenings. Knowing that there is a limit in the usage of medisave citizens might move on the to second and third tier of medical protections which would be medishield life an insurance set by the government and medifund which is a safety net for those who have financial issues. (Financing, Ministry of Health) For the high-income citizens who felt that they have way too much medisave balance to keep in mind that there might be a need to safe keep for the future. As for the middle-income people, they must know that if they deduct medical bills from medisave for every single medical need they might not have enough medisave to be used in the future or when they are at old age. Low-income citizens should be wise on what is important and what is not for medical needs, if there are needs and medisave is insufficient there is always medishield, medifund and seeking help for medical aids through hospital means for clear
Financing the Uninsured In the United States one sixth of the population is without health insurance. Uncompensated care is being provided not only to uninsured and disadvantaged, but also to a growing number of self-supporting, uninsured family, who cannot pay hospital bills (Sigmond, 2004-2005). It has been pointed out that 70% of people without insurance have access to health insurance but have elected not to carry it (Sataloff, 2010). Currently hospitals spend tens of billions of dollars annually providing care for the uninsured.
With those that are insured favoring a moral hazard and overusing the system could lead to a negative impact on our health care system leaving those who truly needing services paying a higher premium or
This would also stop medical bankruptcies, improve public health and reduce overall healthcare spending to name a few, (healthcare.procon.org, n.d.). The con argument is this results in socialism and is the individual’s responsibility, it’s not the governments role to secure healthcare and this would decrease the quality and availability of healthcare and increase debt and spending, (healthcare.procon.org,
A Call for a Single Payer Universal Health Care System As the 2016 Presidential Elections draw near, the topic of much debate is that of healthcare. Some candidates vow for universal healthcare and mandate health insurance for all, while others believe that tax credits and health savings accounts will resolve the current crisis. Consequently, the nation has been divided on which plan to support and move forward with. Some fear universal health care will diminish the quality of care and lead to long waits, while others fear that health savings accounts and tax credits won’t be enough to insure all and will do little to diminish the administrative costs of the current system. Ultimately because healthcare is a basic right that should be guaranteed
It can be quite prevailing for individuals to have financial problems towards health coverage. Based on the Health Affairs reference, “In the last decade, health insurance premiums costs have increased by 80%... whereas 58% of Americans report they are not able to seek medical attention due to high costs” (Gary Claxton, Matthew Rae, and Nirmita Panchal, et al). Statistics also present many factors exhibiting millions of individuals facing the risk of losing their insurance. Above all, health insurance is a basic health necessity. Medical services being available to everyone will benefit the public health not only with quality, but along with quantity.
Over the late years the quantities of uninsured Americans has fundamentally expanded. The 2.2 million late development of uninsured is for the most part because of age and salary changes. At that, most Americans trust that protection scope and access to human services framework are the issues that ought to be organized, and it is the immediate obligation of the central government to guarantee restorative watch over those natives that need protection, even through raising expenses. Today, the US society confronts the continuous problem of "whether the administration ought to make a noteworthy or a constrained push to give medical coverage to the uninsured" (The Henry J. Keiser Family Foundation 1). On the other hand, no choice has yet got
Millions of Americans are constantly reminded of the horrible effects of the Affordable Care Act anytime medical care is required. I have witnessed many families and individuals struggle to cover the extra financial responsibility imposed upon them: Susan Gardiner, a fellow Kroger employee, states her health insurance costs have significantly increased following the approval of the Affordable Care Act; consequently, Ms. Gardiner routinely experiences financial hardships as she requires frequent medical care. Americans simply cannot cope with the Affordable Care Act’s inherent attribute of exorbitant insurance premiums and deductibles. In an attempt to decrease medical costs for an impoverished minority of Americans, the Affordable Care Act,
The expansion of Medicaid through the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has initiated many states to try innovative ideas to improve their Medicaid programs. Many states, like Minnesota, had started the reform process prior to the passage of the ACA with the purpose of improving the quality of care for Medicaid beneficiaries and to utilize a more cost-effective system to provide Medicaid benefits. One of the innovative ideas that states like Minnesota is implementing is the use of accountable care organizations (ACOs). This paper will explore ACOs by studying the reforms within the Minnesota Medicaid program. Background Medicaid was originally established by the government to provide medical services and payment for individuals
46.8 million Americans were reported as uninsured in 2013, which equivocates to one sixth of the population. Those without insurance have revealed that they risk “more problems getting care, are diagnosed at later disease stages, and get less therapeutic care” (National Health Care Disparities Report) and those insured risk losing their insurance. Inadequately covered citizens are often working-class individuals who simply cannot receive insurance due to uncontrollable inconveniences and therefore jeopardize having medical coverage. In these instances, Americans have a chance of being diagnosed with diseases that they had no opportunity to prevent or could not diagnose them at an early stage of the illness. Patients have suffered unnecessarily due to lack of health care, and “18,000 Americans die every year because they don't have health insurance” (PNHP).
The majority of American healthcare are the low income consumers, is a total of 55% who receive health insurance are through their employers and 32% receive health insurance through a government programs. Some of the Federal health care officers were aiming low-income consumers with new advertisements. For most of the
It is very simple. Taxes will increase more than what they already are just so all individuals can have health care (Emanuel & Fuchs, 2005 and Healy, 2009). Best Objection: The major objection to this is also the primary point which is costs.
Universal Health Care In the past 100 years, the United States government has endured many difficulties dealing with the faults present in America's private healthcare system. Even though the federal and state governments have tried stepping in more recently and were able to lessen the negative impacts produced by the system, there are many more that still need to be addressed. As of 2014, 33 million people in the U.S. lack health insurance, resulting in more bankruptcies and deaths for those with and without insurance (Right to Health Care).
The United States government is already very involved with insurance with Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare is already the second largest provider for insurance, covering 43.5 million in 2013. If Medicare and Medicaid was not available it would leave millions insured. If these millions had no insurance it would likely lead countless health problems in United States. These programs are specifically targeted to individuals who have no access to insurance or can not afford insurances.
Public health insurance assures that, since it decreases the gap between social levels as there is no discrimination between rich and poor. According to article (12) in the library of human rights session number (22) “it's the right for every citizen to enjoy the luxury health and receive the highest medication”. Public hospitals provide that by making its number one aim to treat the patient and make sure that the patient has received proper medication without caring about what payments will be paid and what luxuries will be provided according to the paid amount. “The right of each citizen to have an appropriate acces to health care should be based on their needs and not on their ability to pay costs for such care” confirmed by the paper of health and population provided in the eighth national
It is the classic example of market failure. All in all, government intervention in healthcare is due to the government intervention itself. These interventions include the patent law which deliberated to advocate innovative activity and licensure which is intended to maintain minimal standards of quality. All these contribute to the monopoly power that dominates the whole market as well. The specific person or enterprise manages to control the whole market since they are the only supplier of a particular commodity.