Overview of mergers in Indian banking industry
Brief History: Overview
The history of Indian banking can be divided into three main phases:
Phase I (1786- 1969) - Initial phase of banking in India when many small banks were set up.
Phase II (1969- 1991) - Nationalization, regularization and growth
Phase III (1991 onwards) - Liberalization and its aftermath
With the reforms in Phase III the Indian banking sector, as it stands today, is mature in supply, product range and reach, with banks having clean, strong and transparent balance sheets. The major growth drivers are increase in retail credit demand, proliferation of ATMs and debit-cards, decreasing NPAs due to securitization, improved macroeconomic conditions, diversification, interest rate
…show more content…
Historically, mergers and acquisitions activity started way back in 1920 when the Imperial Bank of India was born when three presidency banks (Bank of Bengal, Bank of Bombay and Bank of Madras) were reorganized to form a single banking entity, which was subsequently known as State Bank of India.
In the 1950s and 1960s there were instances of private sector banks, which had to be rescued or closed down because they had very low capital and were mostly operating with other people’s money. For instance, against total deposits of Rs.2750 crore at the end of December1968, the paid-up capital of private sector banks was only Rs.28.5 crore or just a little over 1%. In 1960, the failure of Palai Central Bank and Laxmi Bank led to loss of confidence in the banking system as a whole. So mergers were initiated to avoid losses to depositors and maintain confidence in the system.
In India, mergers have been used to bail out weak banks till the Narasimham Committee-II discouraged this practice. For instance, since the mid-1980s, several private banks had to be rescued through mergers with public sector
…show more content…
These fourteen banks, back then, contained a whooping eighty five per cent of the total bank deposits in our country. 1980, was witness to yet another round of nationalization and six more commercial banks came under the government control. With this huge leap, an enormous ninety one per cent of the banking sector came under direct control of the Indian Government. With this, the number of nationalized banks in India rose to twenty. Sometime later, in the year 1993, the government took yet another stride towards economic prosperity and made a turn towards merger of banks. The New Bank of India was merged with the Punjab National Bank (PNB). This was the first merger between nationalized banks in india. At present in india have 27 nationalized banks and 22 private sector banks and
Report of the Narsimhan Committee
The Narsimhan Committee, to file a report regarding the reforms in the Indian Banking Sector, was set up in the month of December, 1997. It submitted a report with the following suggestions, on April 23, 1998.
It stressed on the use of merger of banks, to enhance size as well as operational strength for each of the
The FDIC was created in 1933 in response to the thousands of bank failures that occurred in the 1920s and early 1930s. The FDIC was a provision of the Glass-Steagall Act. During the nine year period from 1921-1929 more than 600 banks failed each year. The failed banks were small banks operating in the rural suburban areas and held the deposits of mostly farmers and blue collar folks. When banks fold and continue to do so, people will start to worry about their money in any bank.
These facts gave the idea of combining the 2 to make one big company instead of losing money from competing constantly.
What happened to all the banks then? Well first off people had complete trust in them, that is until the stock market crashed. Banks had invested a lot of money in the stock market also. But when it crashed they lost it all and
Beginning with bank reform, the New Dealers were able to maintain oversight in the banking industry, which had previously been an unregulated and unpredictable source of capital. The Glass-Steagal Act and the Emergency Banking Act signaled a shift from a lassiez faire approach to the banking industry to one that ensured banks were making responsible loans and not gambling with depositor’s savings in the stock market. By not allowing banks who were considered “irresponsible’ to reopen and separating the savings and investment functions of the banks, a more secure system began to emerge. The impact of this legislation was immediate, as bank failures dropped dramatically. Additionally, major breakdowns in the banking industry were avoided until fairly recently, which came as a result of the repeal of Glass-Steagal.
Due to the Dust Bowl farmers were defaulting on loans which was a huge cause of bank failures. Also in 1933, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation was created to ensure people's deposits, which now insures $250,000 per bank. Another big cause of the banks failing was because the Great Depression caused people to all withdraw their money at once, which created a huge run on banks. People still debate if the banking system collapse caused the great depression or if the great depression caused all the bank failures, and you can find evidence to show both sides were
What was The Second Bank of America? Why was it such a huge deal in American history? Who supported it, and who did not? Why did it fail? This essay will help explain the answer to each of these questions about the Second Bank of America, or how it was more commonly called, The Bank of the United States, and will inform you of what is used for today.
Organizational Structure Bank of America is an American financial services corporation and is the second largest bank holding organization by assets, in the United States. The headquarter of the financial organization is situated in Charlotte, North Carolina. The bank has approximately 5,700 retail banking offices and 17,250 ATMs in the United States. The online banking system of the bank has more than 30 million active users.
Banking system is essential in our economics to maintain an effective circulation of money. The bank has functions for regulation of currency to aid strong economy. Distribution of the money is crucial to promote construction of the nation and prevention of bankruptcies. In our modern economic structure is supported and developed by the banking system. However, there was a period that the national bank was shut down by the government the consequence of the bank war.
The national bank was incredibly biased in its working, which completely eliminated any equal opportunities for the nation’s people. The bank only favored those who were amongst the rich and powerful. For one, the bank has most frequently been run by those tied to Northern industry. Therefore, little funding or loans have been given to western expansion or to any other southern interests. In addition to these biased actios, Congress itself has granted exclusive privileges to wealthy bank stockholders.
In Addition to maldistribution stood the credit structure of the economy, some farmers were in deep land mortgage debt, so they lowered their crop prices in order to regain credit, and because the farmers were no longer accountable for what they owed banks. Across the nation the banking system found themselves in constant trouble. In America both small and large bankers were concerned for their survival, so they began investing recklessly in stock markets and granting unwise loans. These unconscious decisions would lead a large consequence, such as families losing their life savings and their deposits became uninsured. “ More than 9,000 American banks either went bankrupt or closed their doors to avoid bankruptcy between 1930 and 1933.”Although
Competition between banks has been around since the 1800s. The whole goal for banks is to get more consumers. Competition between banks is still happening this very day; it helps run our economy. There is also time in history that banks have caused problems for example The Great Depression.
Many mergers tend to fail and many others succeed. A merger is the combining of assets and operations, usually between two similar sized companies, in an agreement to join together. Mergers can cause bankruptcy, job losses, less choices, and even a breakup. On the other hand, they have many advantages such as, increased market share, lower cost of production, and higher competitiveness. Most mergers can be highly risky but with the presence of knowledge and intuition they can be successful.
Executive Summary Lehman Brothers were an investment bank involved in transactions worth billions of dollars and one of the most powerful investment banks in the world. Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008 following bad investment in the sub-prime mortgage market and used bad accounting practices called Repo 105 transactions to try and cover up the bad assets. This report sets out the use of the fraud triangle when describing the actions which led to the collapse. The pressure applied on the bank, the opportunity due to the lack of regulation to carry out the actions and the ability of the bank to rationalise their decision making.
I would frame the banking as an industry that is built on trust. Trust that is reaffirmed by the governments, and regulators. Banks have an imperative role in our economic growth, and development. Correspondingly, without the bank industry, there is no industry to replace them as the conduit for social and economic policy. Equally important, there is no industry to replace them as the key performer in creating our economies multiplier effect.
2.0 SITUATION ANALYSIS Below are Malaysian banking industry’s external environment assessment using Porter’s 5 Forces Analysis. For the purpose of this assessment, 3 top-in-the-league existing domestic banking groups in terms of asset size have been chosen i.e. Maybank, CIMB, and PublicBank. All 8 domestic banking groups have operations in all the 3 segments of banking businesses namely Commercial, Islamic, and Investment bank. Upon analyzing and assessing their immediate surroundings, the banking groups recognize the following important factors that would impact on their competitiveness. THREAT OF RIVALRY AMONG EXISTING BANKS • Too many players in the industry; Each banking group has to contend with 7 other domestic banking groups and 30 other banking intermediaries both local and foreign, comprising 19 Commercial, 8 Islamic, and 3 Investment banks.