Meritocracy is the hallmark of a society’s progress. It signifies that a society has moved past class discrimination, and is moving forward into a classless and more equal society, where individuals are recognised for themselves, and not their backgrounds. Meritocracy is defined as the equality of opportunities. In higher education, which shall be defined as post-secondary, undergraduate education in this essay, the concept of meritocracy is often applied to the admissions process. It operates on the principle of non-discrimination, where applicants are are given a fair and equal chance of gaining admission based on their academic and extra-curricular merit. While meritocracy may seem to be the perfect solution to issues of inequality and …show more content…
It was introduced to promote universal education. While there were many that dropped out of school, the majority of school-going children had at least a primary education, providing them with basic literacy and arithmetic skills. Besides providing its citizens with basic education, the government also exercised meritocracy in providing opportunities for students of all walks of life a chance at receiving a university degree. Students who did well were admitted into local universities and provided with financial aid in the form of scholarships, tuition grants and bursaries. Meritocracy promotes fierce competition, pushing students to do their very best, regardless of race, language or religion. This push for excellence has created generation upon generation of highly-educated citizens who have gone on to spur the country’s socio-economic and infrastructural growth. We have seen people of all races and ethnicities excel in spite of their circumstances because of the meritocratic system and the opportunities it has given …show more content…
Again, this is not truly an issue of meritocracy. In fact, it may be said to promote meritocracy. Sportsmen in national teams dedicate large amounts of time to their training, treading between their academics and their sport. Why should we ignore their contributions and their hard work? Should their sportsmanship not be deserving of merit? While it is true that sportsmen on national teams have lower requirements when it comes to securing a spot in a universities, it is not a guaranteed one - they have to meet a minimum standard. The issue of foreign students is a particularly sensitive one, with many Singaporeans wary of ‘foreign talent’. These students have gotten in based on merit - has meritocracy failed us in this? Furthermore, the students who come in on scholarships tend to be the cream of the crop, with only the best applicants receiving scholarships. Would this not push all students, both local and foreign, to work even harder, to be recognised for their
His article spoke a powerful truth that millions of Americans must be aware of. I agree with his call for more working-class students of all races at elite universities. The opening lines of the article where he mentions that most qualified low-income student do not attend Ivy League schools are upsetting since their financial status acts as a negative component to their college application. The privileged point of view of trustees and administrator present serious obstacles to these intentions ever manifesting into reality. The fantasy that all young people are running the same race blinds many university trustees and administrators to the reality that they undervalue students who always have to run uphill.
Everyone in the nation knows of at least one college athlete. Many people have a favorite school and in many cases that is because they either have grown up watching that college team or even attended that school. Most people in the country think that college athletes are important to the school and to our lives because they provide the country with some sort of entertainment. As many sports fans know, college athletes are not allowed to be paid to play until they reach ‘the league’. Some people would even say that these athletes deserve some type of pay, some deserve a scholarship raise, and some think what the athletes are receiving right now is plenty.
Scholarships do not cover all expenses and athletes do not have time to work to pay off their growing debt. Since scholarships do not cover everything, athletes should get paid so they do not graduate with a large debt. The large debt would accumulate from every day to day expenses over the athletes four years of college. The pay would be similar to what they would get if they were working a job because they spend the majority of their time with their sport.
Most athletes are not on full scholarship, which means that they do not get their education 100% for free. Even if some athletes do get any level of scholarship, it is only free for so long. If an athlete does not perform at a high level or if they get hurt, they can easily have that scholarship taken away, and they are left with nothing. These student athletes are supposedly “amateurs” and blessed with “free education,” but in reality, this is not the case. Student athletes should definitely be compensated and recognized for their efforts.
In this situation, this is a reason why they shouldn’t because they get all this free stuff. Finally, not all athletes compete in big divisions. Obviously, some athletes compete in divisions/conferences that make very little or no money for their schools (Paying college athletes). In fact, if schools don’t make as much as other schools, how would they pay them? In brief, athletes with scholarships have the life at college, they also get free clothes
So should they not be paid accordingly? These athletes deserve to be paid for the blood and sweat they put in to make it to the next level. By taking a stand together for the pay of the student-athletes the future of college sports is
College athletes deserve to be paid for their dedication to sports. There has been huge controversy over this and it is considered to be one of the most debatable topics in sports. Inequality in sports has been shown in many ways. This includes women inequity, racial inequality, and coaches being paid more depending on what sport they coach. College athletes should be compensated for their work and be given rights.
There has been a big controversy from years ago about whether or not NCAA students athletes should be paid a salary. This issue is important because so many people believe that these college athletes are already being paid through the scholarships they receive for their studies. However, others argue that they are not been given enough for all their sacrifices and hard work while playing in the field. There are countless reasons why it is fair for students athletes in college to obtain at least a minimum payment, and some of them are because colleges are producing lots of money with students playing sports, body injuries can dramatically risk athletes’ scholarships, and finally because they deserve to receive something back from having their
Classism is a major issue that plagues American society. Classism separates groups by their economic status in society. America is perceived to be a middle class society, however in reality the middle class does not hold majority of the nation’s wealth. Most of the nation’s wealth is held by 1% of the population in America which consists of 34% of the nation’s wealth, meanwhile “the richest 20% of Americans hold nearly 85% of the total household wealth in the country” (Adams et al, 2013, p. 151). American citizens that are a part of the upper class are privilege because they have access to majority of the resources.
Which is very difficult to earn a spot. So many people on the media always says that collegiate athletes should not be paid based on their reputation. If scholarships were taken out of the deal, and only salaries was given to athletes, then it would be more probably fair and affordable for the university, right? Wrong.
As previously stated, America’s current state caused the formation of a caste system that prevents talented, hard-working people from attaining success. In a just society, all people are given equal access to education and opportunities that they don’t get today. Our current system tries, and fails, to accomplish this through Affirmative Action, busing, sdfljgsad;g. This results
When student-athletes received full scholarships, they should be privileged and thankful since the cost of higher education is very expensive. Student-athletes need to understand the circumstances and take of advantage of getting their degree from a well renowned university since the percentages are very slim to none on having a professional career in sports. The purpose of a student-athlete is to be a student first and then an athlete second. The main focus should be on earning a degree, and not worrying about when is the next game on the schedule. Many people are stating that college athletes should get paid, but how about the general student body that has little to nothing and working a job earning minimal pay.
Martha Peraza SOC 3340 Inequality in Education California State University, Bakersfield Abstract In the United States, there exists a gap in equality for different demographics of students. The factors contributing to educational disadvantages include socioeconomic struggles, gender of students, language or culture, and particularly for the scope of this paper, race.
According to the dominant theory the affirmative action was firstly introduced to deal with two types of social disruption in the 1960s as campus protests and urban riots in the North. However, this article is based on different theory as dominant theory's empirical evidence is limited. It examines the initial reason for advent of race-conscious affirmative action in 17 undergraduate institutions in the United States. And according to the research this article concludes that there were two waves that contributed to affirmative action: 1) first wave in the early 1960s introduced by northern college administrators 2) second wave in the late 1960s introduced as a response to the protests of campus-based students. This article will help me to establish the main reasons for introduction of race-conscious affirmative action in undergraduate
This would be not fair to hard-working students who cannot afford college and rely on scholarships and aid. Unfortunately, athletes focus more on performance than on academics, and scholarship money may go to