The river valley civilizations consisted of northern China, northwestern India, Mesopotamia, and Egypt. All four civilizations had their own ways of living, and beliefs. While each different civilization had similarities, they also had their differences. Most of their beliefs did differ, they had different forms of governments, religious beliefs, writing, and laws. The sources in The Global Experience portray written Chinese language, as well as religious indian prayers, Hammurabi's law codes, and an Egyptian story about a man returning from exile. Within each source it reveals how each civilization made a living, their beliefs, laws, etc. The Chinese used oracle bones in their writing. “In the late Shang era, rulers sought guidance from …show more content…
Mesopotamia made their living by following the code of Hammurabi. From reading the laws I understood that Mesopotamians valued men more than woman, took slavery very serious. “Insofar as the Code prescribes different punishments for men and woman, free citizens and peasants or slaves” (38) Hammurabi took serious crimes such as murder, burglary, and adultery very serious. These serious offenses lead to death upon the sinner. At the beginning of the Codes what really caught my attention was that they took accusations really serious. “If a man has accused a man and has charged him with manslaughter and then has not proved (it against) him, his accuser shall be put to death.“ (39) The codes vary so much and just from reading it all I can tell the way the Mesopotamians wanted to live. And eye for an eye, a marriage contract written by the man, a forehand of a son for striking his father, etc. There’s a reason why these codes were enforced. People don’t just enforce laws because they want to, they do it because it has become a problem and they want to put an end to it. From the Codes I could tell that King Hammurabi was a serious leader. Hammurabi may have also been really religious because he didn’t tolerate adultery, stealing, and just anything that isn’t moral. The last civilization is the Egyptians. They had kings. What I understood from the story is that People were very loyal to the kings. “When the king died Sinuhe goes into voluntary exile.” (43) Sinuhe then became a very successful man. He got land, married, had children and was
Was it Just? “Cursed!” is what you'll hear if you decline the written rules of Hammurabi.400 years ago in 1754 Bce. A man named Hammurabi became king of a city called babylonia and made certain rules about family law, property law, and personal injury law and although they were laws, not all laws were fair. To begin with, Hammurabi made a decision to write rules for his land. But were they just?let's answer that.
Can you imagine accidentally taking something from a seller and getting the death penalty for an honest mistake! Well you better believe because this was just one one of hammurabi's 282 rules. About 40 centuries ago a set of laws called Hammurabi’s code. Hammurabi ruled the babylonian Empire With a population of 1,000,000 people for 42 years after his father’s death. But not all his codes were fair to all of the people in his Empire.
Hammurabi’s code was not just because the personal injury laws did not protect all people equally, property laws were harsh and not protecting people enough, and the Family laws should allow people to be with whoever they want to be with. Looking at the evidence from the Personal Injury Laws states that punishments towards slaves are
The Code of Hammurabi was a comprehensive set of laws that are considered by many scholars and historians to be the oldest laws established. They were passed down for four thousand years by King Hammurabi of Babylon. Although the code was created with good intent and humanitarian intent it contained the “eye for an eye” theory of punishment, which is a very barbaric form of the concept of making the punishment fit the crime. This and many other laws within the code tell us humans a lot about the Mesopotamian civilization but one’s that stood out are code numbers 3, 5, and 6. The Code of Hammurabi was a unique set of laws and had many interesting ones, but one that I think that stood out and revealed a lot about Mesopotamian civilization is code number 3, “if anyone bring an accusation of any crime before the elders, and does not prove what he has charged, he shall, if it be a capital offence charged, be put to death.”
Hammurabi’s Code was unjust to the people of Babylon. For example, starting with the family laws, law number 129 (Document C) said that if a married woman is caught in adultery with another man, they shall both be tied up and thrown in the water to drown. In my opinion, this law is too harsh, they should both go to prison instead.
Hammurabi’s code was not just because of the family law, property law, and personal-injury law. The family law, in Hammurabi’s code, was unfair because in the law 195 it states, “ If a son struck his father, his hands shall be cut off.” (Doc C) This is not just because, if someone struck their father in common era, they would probably only get grounded. Things back then were a lot harsher that they are now.
The Code of Hammurabi were laws in ancient Mesopotamia, established by King Hammurabi during his reign between 1792-1750 B.C. The Mesopotamians believed the idea of divine kingship, in which kings were chosen by the gods to rule over the nation. Therefore, kings were high and superior in their eyes. Mesopotamians obeyed their rulers and their laws, including the Code of Hammurabi. These laws were considered divine order. The Code of Hammurabi showed the daily life of ancient
Laws are always the core of a society and they often indicate a variety of lifestyle decisions made by those people. Hammurabi’s famous set of laws and Moses’ laws could be viewed as two completely distinct documents, yet both set of laws aide historians in revealing insight to the Hebrew and Mesopotamian people. In both societies, enforcing strict consequences that are equivalent to the crime is common. Hammurabi’s well known law states that, “if a man has put out an eye of a free man, they shall put out his eye.” Whereas, in the Hebrew laws, it states, “...if any harm follows, then you shall give life for life, eye for eye...”
Hammurabi's code is unjust. Hammurabi did try to do what was right by trying to have a community with justice, but the laws are very unequal and harsh. These laws would not last in today's
Some laws varied according to whether you were either higher class or lower class, and whether you were a man or a woman. Hammurabi’s Code was not just because the punishments were cruel and some were gruesome. Children were not treated as well as adults, even though his laws were supposed to protect woman and young children. Hammurabi’s code was based off the saying “an eye for an eye.” Some people probably could not even read what the writing
The most significant factor that influenced the development of ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia was their geography, because their locations by large rivers led the civilizations to produce an abundance of food, leading to a population increase and for several cities to form which influenced the cultural, economic, and political influence of both civilizations. The flooding within both ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia allowed their agriculture to thrive Mapping sentence for culture. Mapping sentence for economic. Mapping sentence for Political. Transition.
King Hammurabi’s codes were unjust because of the evidence found in the 282 laws. The codes that King Hammurabi wrote about were personal injury law, property law and family law. First, there is evidence that the codes were unjust. The first, code was personal injury law.
Ancient Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt were two early human civilizations that lived during the bronze age in harsh desert environments located not far from each other. Both civilizations were built around rivers that they depended on for survival. There is evidence that these rivers had great influence on both the societies politics and culture. Egypt was built around the very strong and reliable Nile River. Ancient Mesopotamia was established in the fertile crescent between the less reliable Tigris and Euphrates Rivers.
The Judgments of Hammurabi are a set of laws that were written by a god. The laws were put in place “to promote the welfare of the people, to cause justice to prevail in the land, and so the strong might not oppress the weak.” The Tale of The Eloquent Peasant, depicts how a peasant has been robbed of his goods and how he eloquently appeals to the king for justice to be served. Both articles discuss; the division of a society’s social class, how gods/kings interpret justice and family relationships within the law. The Judgments of Hammurabi laid out the rules for Mesopotamian citizens.
Hammurabi's code, a set of laws that ruled the people of Babylon. The Code worked as a legal version of revenge, "an eye for an eye". The Code ensured that if a person caught committing a crime would be punish for his crime. Some may argue that the code was barbaric, but the Babylonian's viewed it as the most efficient way to punish crimes.