In Keith M. Parsons’, “Message to My Freshman Students.”, He shows that he is very biased. To me the points he tells don’t prove anything, as they’re invalid. He tells how students need to adapt to how professors teach, when coming into college. He also tells that the teachers are the ones to blame for freshman students being, “apathetic, incurious, inattentive, unresponsive and frequently absent” (Keith M. Parsons’,” Message to My Freshman Students”). He goes on to talk about how him as well as other Professors are not Teachers. Regardless if the teachers are evaluated and professors are not, the main goal is to make sure the students understand the material. Now I agree that students should be challenged. However, don’t change their entire …show more content…
Just because someone does something in a different way than you, doesn’t mean their way is wrong. Both students and teachers find that a teacher’s way of teaching is more efficient than a professor’s lecture. I agree. After all, not many people can learn as well when someone just puts up a PowerPoint and reads for an hour, while we take notes. “You need to learn to listen. The kind of listening you need to learn is not passive absorption, like watching TV; it is critical listening.”, Keith said. He compares students learning to listen to watching tv. Yes, saying that seems very reasonable. However, it’s not that simple. If that was the case, most people would be considered genius’s. After all, people are going to remember something on a tv show faster than they will in a lecture. It’s the fact that an hour lecture won’t engage students as a 30-minute show or an hour-long movie. Most teachers know how to keep the students engaged in their 30-minute or hour-long class, because they just aren’t up there talking the entire time. How can you blame someone for doing something that works best for everyone? The only one that should change would be the professor. Why change everyone else just to keep a tradition that doesn’t benefit anyone anymore? I say keep spoon feeding the information so that students can continue their success. Through out Keith’s “message”, he listed a bunch of way’s that basically said, regardless of what happens he still gets paid and won’t get in trouble for it. Therefore, professors are free of some of the stress that teachers have. Just go with the flow and everyone’s
Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus writes Are College Worth the Price of Admission? on how some universities should improve their approach to their students, faculty, and the school’s structure. They discussed how schools should be engaging their students. They mention several things that affects the faculty like sabbaticals, tenure, and adjuncts. They also made some statements regarding the school’s view on education.
The current form of teacher accountability, is well known, but has little support. The system we have adapted to, judges our teachers and views them as simple minded. Tucker points out in the report, Fixing Our National Accountability Problems, that having standardized tests judging our teachers is not giving students a better education. Nocera uses Tucker’s quote: “There is no
After reading the interviews on Len Bickman and now David Fetterman, it seems being an evaluator is dangerous work. It is frustrating to read the obstacles educators have to navigate to see progress made in discovering new ways to teach and learn. We are trying to educate in a fast paced world where information changes so quickly, so how will schools ever be free to move with the ever changing landscape when the political dynamic creates obstacles of progress. Luckily we get to read about educators who are not afraid to step in front of the train and evaluate with integrity and demand we do what is right for our students. Fetterman explains how easy it is to be retrospectively courageous, but the hardest thing is to do the right thing at
So students would now expect their college classes to be enjoyable, to be a good class according to them. These treatments will evaducally lead to uneducated and uncurious students. Edmundson is annoyed by remarks that
In math we learn to add and subtract, and that’s ok but we don’t need to learn how to find all the over the top equations. Nobody will ever use that kind of stuff in their workplace. In history we learn about things that are not really important to me like the old presidents or stuff that happened 200 years ago. In the video TED Talk, “How Schools Kill Creativity,” by Ken Robinson, he states, “And in pretty much every system too,there's a hierarchy within the arts.
In a study done at Michigan State University in 1983, Donald Freeman and his associates selected five standardized tests that were given nationwide, as well as four textbooks that were widely used to see if the material on the tests is covered in the textbooks. They found that 50 to 80 percent of the questions on the test were not adequately covered in the textbooks. Michigan researchers said, “The proportion of topics presented on a standardized test that received more than a cursory treatment in each textbook was never higher than 50 percent” (Popham). This proves that some teachers, while it is not their fault, do not appropriately prepare their students for these tests, because the material is barely discussed in the textbook. Those teachers who are unfamiliar with the type of questions that are on the state assessments are going to assume that if it is truly meant to test how well students learn, then it will assess them based on how the subject in question is taught locally.
The article, “Never Say Anything a Kid Can Say,” by Steven C. Reinhart that was published in 2000 was quite an interesting read. Throughout this article, the author explained a teaching technique that he thought was the most effective for students to learn the most. He explained that it was a process; it wasn’t a technique that could be implemented and accomplished within a few days. The main idea of this philosophy was to have the students do the explaining and the teacher do the listening, which is completely opposite of the normal classroom setting.
Standardized Testing ; Are they so bad? Standardized testing can come with huge consequences for students and even teachers. A student who was a junior from Arlington, Texas got suspended because he took a picture of a STAAR exam.
Students not only need to gain the knowledge for the field that they will be working in, but more importantly they need the knowledge of basic life skills on how to think and react to life experiences. It is important for people to understand that knowledge is power, and knowing that it’s not all about you is one of the best realizations one can have. We are all here to collectively work together for some type of common goal. No one person is more valuable than the other. So the next time we are waiting in line in Walmart, we shouldn’t be cursing about how the cashier is too slow, or that they need to open more lines because we are in a hurry.
He goes on to speak about how the ‘superiors’ of society limit success by grading, saying “But I submit that this set-up itself makes it impossible for the student to become the master, to have grown up, and to commence on his own. He will always be making A or B for some overseer” (Par 7). He uses an appeal to logic to show how and why the system doesn’t work, and how and why we should replace
If no one is paying attention, there is no way a person can be educated. What is being provided should result in mastery in that subject, not zone out the audience
According to Carlina Rinaldi (2006), to listen is to be open to others and to what they have to say, is to consider others as subjects that contribute to shared research that each person develops about the meaning of everyday experiences. Listening requires an in-depth understanding of events, situations, ideas, and is free of judgment and prejudices. Listening is a reciprocal process that involves the listener and the one that communicates, recognizes the right to participation of children, teachers and parents, legitimizing their theories and interpretations of the surrounding world (Lino,
It shouldn’t matter how we choose to learn the lecture, material, or lesson, but as long as we understand the concept to the fullest capacity can fit. According to Dr. Wu, “To change behavior, it 's important to give children brief and powerful messages several times and consistently” (Wu), as he explains how the child 's brain is still developing and needs brief and powerful messages consistently. Which theater is the perfect remedy for what Dr. Wu is explaining. Everyday people walk by, not noticing the small things that make up life and so it 's easy to take things for granted. The importance of education is to empower one’s mind of knowledge but does it matter the process of how you achieve that?
Listening is a crucial part in communication that allows us to become more effective and productive in our personal lives and also in a professional setting like in school. As a student at UC Davis, listening is essential in order to obtain success in my classes as I must listen to my professor’s lectures in order to comprehend the class material. By examining 4 listening practices and putting them into action helped me become a better listener during lectures and become more efficient and productive in my classes. The first listening concept from the articles that I chose to do was to prepare ahead of time.
The purpose of education is to create the “catalyst”, - the interest, the imagination, the self-confidence, the enthusiasm for further knowledge that helps a person grow beyond what they believe they can be. Education should help develop skills and knowledge, so students can be productive members of society. The more knowledge you have, the more opportunities you have in life. I think back to my childhood and the teachers that made an impact in my life. I want to be that catalyst for students.