Metadiscourse And Rationale

1365 Words6 Pages
History of Metadiscourse & Rationale Within the domain of second language acquisition, several theorists have examined writing and other language skills in order to reach the best ways of how to effectively teach the English language learners. The old belief was that the mastery of grammar is enough for good writing. Also, rich vocabulary was also believed to be essential for effective writing. Following Bloomfield’s view, the attention moved to the sentence level and the focus has move to the effective construction of sentences, ignoring the wide set of skills needed in order to write a coherent text (Martin, 1992). Indeed, writing a coherent text entails a set of skills which include sentence structure, rhetorical skills, cognitive…show more content…
Metadiscourse is a mechanism that can be used to manage attitude, proposition, and information within a piece of writing. Metadiscourse involves using a tentative language to distinguish between facts and claims in case those writers are not perfectly certain about the facts they convey (Hyland, 2002). Metadiscourse is essential in academic writing. It is also used to maintain objectivity. Objectivity is usually linked to the credibility of the writer. Using metadiscourse or avoiding it comes to be an art. Inappropriate use of metadiscourse might violate the written…show more content…
Principles of Metadiscourse
According to Hyland (2005), metadiscourse rests upon three basic principles:
1. Metadiscourse differs from the propositional aspects of discourse: metadiscourse is not merely a kind of glue that links the ideas in the text or that it is only a comment on the text, but it is a key element in the text that helps connect the text to the broader context by taking into account the reader’s needs, existing knowledge, and intertextual experiences.
2. Metadiscourse points to the text aspects that involve the interactions between readers and writers: as Halliday (1996) mentioned that the major function of language is communication, metadiscourse at the textual and interpersonal levels serve the communication between the readers and the writers. Metadiscourse is not only the logical transition of ideas within the text, but the writer share the readers his propositions, his experiences, and his background knowledge.
3. Metadiscourse marks out the relations that internal to the text from those which are external to the text: the linguistic items are considered metadiscourse if they serve the internal relationships to the meaning. For example, additives add activities (external meaning) and add arguments (internal
Open Document