Blood Relations by Sharon Pollock utilizes metadrama within its plot to stress the uncertainty that develops regarding the accusations that Miss Lizzie faces concerning the murder of her parents. At the end of Act 2, in lines 586-595 metatheoretical elements are present when Miss Lizzie denies the indictments that are directed towards her, concerning her involvement in her parent’s deaths. In line 593 The Actress regains control of her own character and comes to the decision that Lizzie did in fact kill her parents by saying “Lizzie you did” (Pollock 429). However, Miss Lizzie replies saying that “[she] didn’t. [The Actress] did.”; since this scene is metadramatic, it allows Miss Lizzie to transfer the blame for the murders onto The Actress (429). …show more content…
This reciprocation of the allegation serves as a mean to construct doubt. Essentially, this passage leads to uncertainty, because the accusations are being directed towards more than one character, who both portray Lizzie at times throughout the play. Although the flashback earlier in the play portrayed reasonable cause that Miss Lizzie did commit the murders, Pollock leave the reader with scepticism through this last metadramatic passage, which introduces hesitation into the situation. Ultimately, the use of metadrama within the play Blood Relations is representative of the uncertainty that has surrounded the Lizzie Borden case for the last
We witness each murder being discovered in detail, First her stepmother, then her father. We see the clues being pieced together one by one, the suspect list growing and shrinking and containing different names in each chapter, but one was constant Lizzie Borden. The next
Rumors and assumptions are dangerous when it comes to keeping relationships. An example of the play “Mystery of the Suffocated Seventh Grader” is the game telephone. In the Play Perry Paulson spreads rumors and is a rumor. Liz just assumed that Principal Nolan was talking about Perry Paulson when she overheard him saying how he had killed something.
These statements show how she was not able to stick with one story about the place that she came from to the spot of her father’s dead body; rather, she kept changing her story which proves that she was guilty of the murder. These are some examples regarding Lizzie’s strange behavior by giving different answers to the same question which proves her guilty of the
In the article, “Fourteen Reasons to Believe Lizzie Murdered Her Parents” by Unknown, it asserts that, “On the night before the murders, Lizzie visited a neighbour, Alice Russell, and told her that she feared that some unidentified enemy of her father’s might soon try to kill him.” This shows that Lizzie told her neighbour that her father was going to get murdered soon. This also means that Lizzie told Alice one of her father’s enemies is going to try to kill him soon. That is the second reason on why I think Lizzie killed her
The murder of Andrew and Abby Borden has been referred to as an unsolved mystery for centuries. Investigators questioned a single suspect, commonly known as Lizzie Borden, the eldest daughter of Andrew Borden. After finding no physical evidence linking her to the murders, Lizzie was acquitted and the case was never opened again. Several sources have provided eye-opening facts that make me reconsider the true culprit. Lizzie Borden is the person guilty of both murders because of her contradictory testimony along with her alibi, the mental instability she displayed, and her strange behavior prior the murders.
Although both Perry and Dick had committed terrible crimes, Capote focuses instead on emotionally humanising Perry, and to a lesser extent Dick; therefore Capote claims that immoral acts alone do not make a person inherently evil. Capote reveals how deeply emotional, and how quickly Perry can get emotionally attached to someone with an analogy: “But he was afraid to leave Dick; merely to consider it made him “sort of sick,” as though he were trying to “jump off a train going ninety-nine miles an hour. ””(124) The juxtaposition between Perry as a murderer and Perry as child who is controlled by his emotions is a recurring idea in the second part of In Cold Blood, and it exemplifies Capote’s current purpose of humanising Perry. Capote’s main
Truman Capote’s book In Cold Blood, focuses on a quiet town in eastern Kansas where the slaughter of the Clutter family occurred. Although Perry is a brutal murderer, he is the result of his troublesome past; therefore, indicating that the past plays a part in the character of one's future self. Throughout his childhood, Perry has encountered abuse, separation, and abandonment from his home and it directly affected who he has become. The way that Capote writes about Perry’s past makes it evident that it was miserable.
In addition, the use of superstitions in the play by Willy Russell was executed flawlessly as it highlights the reason of the sequential events in Blood brothers. The play, looking at it from a wider scope, is wholly based on superstitions which are revealed by Mrs. Johnstone and frequently repeated by the narrator. the narrator is not only seen as the informant to the audience, but also acting as the conscience of all the characters in the play. This was shown throughout the play and the narrator especially focused on Mrs Johnstone when he kept saying:"Now ye know the devil 's got your number Ye know he 's gonna find ye". The narrator 's use of superstitions is utilized to create and make Mrs Johnstone feel trepidation and regret constantly over her decision of giving one of her babies away.
The movie version of The Crucible brings to light new information that demystifies a formerly vague storyline, and is more effective in getting across its meaning than the book. The scene in which Abigail visits Proctor in prison adds context to the plot that one cannot gather directly from the book, explains the motivation behind Abigail's actions in the play, and is very well acted. It also provides a clearer depiction of Proctor’s loyalty and devotion to his wife, Elizabeth. The character development that takes place in this scene gives the viewer a more in-depth understanding of Abigail’s manipulative tendencies and of John Proctor’s sense of obligation towards his wife than is derived from the book. First and foremost, the text of
Perry is perceived as an instrument in the hands of Dick. Perry is being used by Dick to commit the crime, even though Perry did not have the intention of killing the family; Mr. Capote makes this evident in the fact that each of killers responds to murdering the family in unlike ways. Truman Capote exemplifies the fact that Dick is more guilty than Perry by separating the murderers, and all in all, not all murderers are comparably
Blood will have blood. (3.4. ?)” The association of blood to his murderous crimes is used to signify his dirty conscious. Blood is messy and can stain clothes similarly to how the repercussions of Macbeth’s actions have a lasting effect of his conscience. He is experiencing Post Traumatic Stress Disorder by reliving the horrors of confronting his actions.
The guilt that comes from the presence of blood, helps readers develop who Macbeth and Lady Macbeth really are. Blood plays a large role in the development of Macbeth's character.
Also, the main theme that is underlined by the playwright of Doubt: A Parable is the abuse of the power. Shanley suggested an up-to-date topic, considering several scandals about the Catholic Church’s priests who had had sexual relations with young parishioners. This play with no proofs and it ends with an open-ended. Although in the play Sister Aloysius and Sister James try to judge whether the priest –
Shakespeare’s play “Macbeth” explores a man’s fall from morality through committing the act of regicide, as well as ideas of guilt, greed and corruption. A motif of blood is used throughout the play to aid Shakespeare’s character development of Macbeth and it also facilitates further exploration of the figurative moral compass and culpability. Blood is used as a symbol and physical manifestation of guilt within characters throughout the play. Firstly, Shakespeare uses the motif of blood to emphasise the moral deterioration of Macbeth 's character.
In those lines, Hawthorne quickly turns the questions back to Martha as if he knows that he does not have the evidence to support these claims. This is what adds to the hysteria. The court is convicting people of a crime without the proper evidence and they are basing the verdict solely on the statements of others.