The issue of secondment resulting in tax exposure for the foreign enterprise has been raised in many Indian rulings. In the case of Metapth Software International Ltd , a company incorporated under laws of UK was a leading provider of software solutions to wireless communication providers. The taxpayer sold software and hardware to Indian customers against payment and transferred ownership of said goods in India. Further, the taxpayer deputed its two employees in India to assist in the set up, establishment and ongoing operation as of n Indian company. The employees were deputed for a year and their salaries were borne by the taxpayer. The ITAT Delhi held that the taxpayer has a service PE in India as the taxpayer failed to furnish details …show more content…
JC Bamford India Ltd to license know how and related technical documents consisting of all drawings and designs with an exclusive right to manufacture and market Excavator Loader in territory of India. Subsequently, JCBE, JCBI and the taxpayer entered into a tripartite agreement pursuant to which IP was sub-licensed to the taxpayer subject to right of JCBI to continue to exploit IP. As a result, JCBI started paying royalty to the taxpayer. The taxpayer, in turn paid 99.50% of the royalty received from JCBI to JCBE, while retaining 0.50% as its income. Further, as per the technology transfer agreement, JCBE seconded its employees to JCBI on assignment basis. The tax authorities contended that employees of JCBE as seconded to JCBI constitutes a service PE of taxpayer as they were covered under expression ‘or the other personnel’. The ITAT Delhi stated that expression of secondment in itself entails that the employees is still employed by its existing employer but due to an agreement the employer performs duties that benefit a third party , bit the seconded employees performed work that benefited JCBI. The seconded employees in this case remained on JCBI;s payroll and the agreement between JCBI and JCBI clearly stated seconded employees were not to be considered employed by JCBI. The ITAT Delhi held that since seconded employees furnished services including managerial services for a period of more than 90 days during the relevant period, Service PE of the taxpayer is constituted in
Predication: On 11/11/17, Asset Protection Manager (APM) Kristin Catucci contacted APM Jakub Orlando regarding Customer Service Associate (CSA) Anthony Stoddart who was suspected of taking money out of the register for personal benefit. Facts: On 11/14/17, APM Orlando reviewed CCTV footage along with POS electronic journal to confirm this allegation. CCTV footage reviled that CSA Stoddart took money from the bottom of the register and placed it into his pocket.
With the advent of the ACA (Affordable Care Act) reporting requirements, many companies are unclear as to what forms they need to complete and submit. Form 1095-B is one of the forms causing confusion. However, by understanding how your company handles health insurance coverage for its employees, you can determine if you are responsible for filing Form 1095-B every year. What is Form 1095-B? The ACA requires that all individuals have health insurance or face tax penalties.
Cobell vs. Government The flied done against the government as a “Mismanagement, ineptness, dishonesty and delay of federal officials” was filled June 10, 1996 and it took years for settlement of 3.4 billion in December 2010 1.4 billion to the plaintiffs and 2 billion allocated for repurchase of lands distributed under Dawes act. I have done some research regarding on what has happen since Authorizing the funding and what are the recent appeals and lastly Cobell goal. However recently president Obama sings legislation authorizing the government funding of the final portion of the 3.4 billion settlements and Judge Hogan is in charge for the fairness hearing on the settlement in spring of 2011this is a year since the settlement.
On March 18, 1981, the entire island was listed on the National Register for Historical Places and designated the Kaho`olawe Archaeological District. At the request of then representative/senate candidate Patricia Saiki, President Bush, two weeks before the 90s election, told the Secretary of Defense to immediately cease the use of Kaho 'olawe as a weapons range. During the same period of time, Senator Akaka, was competeing with Mrs. Saiki for the senate seat, introduced legislation to create a Kaho 'olawe conveyance commission. This proposal became part of the 1991 Defense Appropriations Act [PL 101-511, Sec. 8118]. Section 8118 established the Kaho`olawe Island Conveyance Commission to recommend terms and conditions for the conveyance of
Dear Mr. Gaylord Bigmoney: Thank you for contacting me to review your investments and for advice on whether or not to purchase additional state and municipal bonds. Mr. Rich Broker has given you a couple recommendations about your investment portfolio. First, Mr. Broker has recommended that you take the cash presently invested in the Certificates of Deposits and purchase more state and municipal bonds. Second, Mr. Broker has recommended that you borrow an additional $800,000 on one of the unencumbered apartment houses, which would require you to give a Deed of Trust for security on the loan, and use the loan proceeds to purchase more state and municipal bonds. When Mr. Broker gave you these recommendations the rates were as follows: present
People v. Porco 71 A.D.3d 791 (2010) People v. Porco is a murder case in which the defendant appealed the court erred in allowing the detective to testify about his mother. The defendant was convicted of second degree murder, and attempted murder of the second degree. The defendant attacked his parents with an axe while they were asleep in bed, killing his father, and attempting to kill his mother. The evidence used in trial was his mother’s affirmative nod to the detective to confirm that her son was the perpetrator while being treated by the paramedics. He also admitted at trial of other uncharged crimes that held similar means of execution and were disguised as break-ins.
Lawsuit funding is a risk-free cash advance to plaintiffs to help them get the medical treatment and surgery procedures they need now while they seek the legal settlement they deserve. Lawsuit funding provides immediate cash for medical and surgery bills as well as your regular monthly expenses, such as mortgage, car payments, grocery bills and other expenditures. If you are a complainant in the malfunctioning DePuy hip replcement (Pinnacle or the ASR type) lawsuit and going through financial and psychological problems than you might be entitled or a hip implant funding for litigation or lawsuit funding. Who is Eligible for DePuy Hip Replacement Lawsuit Funding or Settlement Loan?
In 2013, the Supreme Court case Moncrieffe v. Holder refuses a Board of Immigration Appeals to removal from the United States of a lawful permanent resident based on a long term criminal conviction related to sole possession of small amounts of marijuana. The case finally made it all the way to the Supreme Court, which is considered a rather technical question of the interpretation of the U.S Immigration laws. Local police departments have long been accused of profiling Hispanic, African-Americans, and other minorities of race in law enforcement activities, including run of the mill traffic stop. Critics fear that immigration enforcement by state and local authorities will lead to increase of racism. Many Americans have shown concerns with the implementation of racist discrimination of the U.S immigration laws by state police agencies and local authorities.
A 6-3 vote in favor of New Jersey was all it took to strike down TLO’s request to suppress the evidence as well as her confession. In previous cases, courts have ruled that school officials were exempt from the restrictions put in place due to their need to enforce authority over their students. The Supreme Court decided that in this case, the exclusionary clause would apply to school officials. This means that because they’re school officials, they don’t have to have as many means to perform a search on the students because students should have a decreased expectation of privacy. Their decision meant that the evidence found in TLO’s purse along with her confession had to reason to be excluded because her 4th Amendment rights were not violated.
In regards to the Brent Small case, I personally believe that Mr. Smalls shouldn't be found guilty due to the lack of evidence. Although there was a witness who saw what happened, the evidence isn’t consistent with the case. The vehicle did match the description but the witness was unsure of the license plate and the damage to the vehicle isn’t significant to the crime committed. I don't believe that the evidence is strong enough to convict Mr. Smalls.
Prior to the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), few people anticipated employer-provided health care would disappear as a major player in the United State healthcare arena. However, ACA adoption and has put more than 169 million employees at risk for losing their workplace coverage. Several studies indicate employer-based coverage will decline rapidly over the next decade as the traditional US system is displaced by the healthcare exchange system. While consumers grapple with finding affordable coverage options and providers adjust to the new norms, there is another wrinkle in the mix. In January, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Sylvia M. Burwell announced the agency's push toward value-based and alternative reimbursement models.
You are a new physician setting up your practice in a new town. You are researching the different MCOs offered in your area and are considering becoming a physician for one of these networks. You have also invited the sales representatives of several healthy plans to speak with you about the benefits of choosing their plans. Based on the above scenario, answer the following questions: • What effects would join an MCO have your clinic regarding staffing, patient volume, and financial stability?
Apprendi vs. New Jersey Apprendi vs. New Jersey landmarked United States Supreme Court decisions dealing with provoking factors in crimes. Furthermore, it was found that judges were prohibited to sentence beyond the maximum amount because of factors other than the ones found by the jury. Beyond a reasonable doubt was the key word in this case. This case decision has been the precedent for the rights of people in jury trials. This case set the tone for other trials where an increased prison term was questionable.
Know the Diverse Benefits of Availing Small Claims Services A small claims court is a special court where disputes are resolved swiftly and inexpensively. It does not require any attorney, and here, the hearing is informal. It covers an encompassing range of cases, such as: • Property damage or personal injury from a car accident • Landlord/tenant security deposits • Damage to your property by a neighbor • Disputes with contractors about repairs or home improvement jobs • Collection of money owed • Homeowner association disputes If you are filing the claim, you will be called as plaintiff, whereas if you are being sued, then you will be defendant.
The following essay will outline the variances of two case” Illinois v. Gates and Spinelli v. United States. It will discuss the Supreme Court requires to establish probable cause for a warrant. Illinois v. Gates In Illinois v. Gates, law enforcement received a letter (that was anonymous) stating that the Gate family was in the drug transporting business, and operating between the states of Florida and Illinois. Upon investigation, law enforcement discovered that Gates had made the purchase of an Air Line ticket, traveling to Florida.