My essay will determine if a local chemical manufacturing plant is in compliance with OSHA Methylene Chloride, specializing in paint stripper for the DOD. Occupational health standard establishes requirements for employers to control occupational exposure to methylene chloride. Exposure may occur through inhalation, by absorption through the skin, or through contact with the skin. The standard requires that the employer establish a regulated area where exposure to airborne concentrations of methylene chloride exceeds or can be expected to exceed either the PEL or the STEL. Determine if the plant is using a soy-based stripper that do not contain methylene chloride, N-methylpyrrolidone, or other toxic solvents, when it comes to paint stripping …show more content…
If employee exposure is above the action level, but at or below both the PEL and STEL, employers must monitor employees at least every 6 months. If exposure is above the PEL or STEL, employers must monitor employees at least every 3 months. For employees with two consecutive measurements taken at least 7 days apart that indicate that exposure has decreased below both the PEL and STEL, employers may change the monitoring schedule from every 3 months to every 6 months. When periodic monitoring taken two consecutive times at least 7 days apart shows employee exposure is below the action level and the STEL, employers may discontinue monitoring for those employees represented by the monitoring data. In conclusion, OSHA standard (Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1910.1052, 1915.1052, and 1926.1152) covers all occupational exposures to methylene chloride in all workplaces in general industry, shipyard employment, and construction. The employer must ensure that no employee is exposed to an airborne concentration of methylene chloride in excess of 25 ppm as an 8-hour TWA. Reaching or exceeding the action level signals that employers must begin compliance activities such as exposure monitoring and medical
This train is carrying chlorine within a 90-ton rail car which has received significant damage and is leaking. The Incident Commander on scene advises of a small to moderate release of chlorine gas into the environment and a two-hour window before total failure of the container. This incident is threatening the nearby community, which includes a Wal-Mart, elementary school and the No Hope Hospital two blocks
“It’s proven that higher levels of fluoride can cause upper respiratory issues to workers.” “And I don’t want my coworkers or myself dealing with the long lasting effects of this damage.” said Woodley. “The debate is still going on, but we are already exposed to fluoride and chlorine in the air that is considered ‘safe’ by the government, we don’t need to add on to other serious medical issues.” said
Many different processes produce air contaminants. Dust and fiber are two types of solid particles that may be of concern depending on their nature. Chemical hazards can have several methods of exposure either through skin contact, ingestion, absorption by the skin, and/or by breathing them in. Due to their hazardousness, chemical substances are identified by Safety Data Sheets (SDS) and are required in the workplace for reference. Biological hazards are living organisms and enter the worker which can cause infection and disease.
It all occurred on the 3rd of December back in 1984 in Bhopal, India. Due to zero of six safety systems being functional in Union Carbides ethylene producing factory more than 27 tons of methyl isocyanate and other extremely harmful gases were released into the atmosphere of Bhopal. The Union Carbide factories own documents prove that the company had taken shortcuts on safety and maintenance in order to save money and also used unproven technology in the design of the plant. It is beyond me how this is allowed to happen with a plant that produces such dangerous chemicals and has the power to do such serious and widespread damage. In the early hours of the 3rd of December residents of Bhopal awoke to fits of coughing as there lungs began to fill with fluid, which lead to cardiac and respiratory arrest.
In this case, a violation originally deemed willful was reduced to a “serious” violation, bringing the associated penalty down from $70,000 to $7000. Other serious violations were reduced from $7000 to $5000 because R. Williams is a small employer with no prior history of injuries or OSHA violations. I think if the company can provide solid proof of training to their employees and provide evidence that the company did everything to provide employees with the knowledge to work safely, they will not be at fault for the violations OSHA assigned them. An employee’s actions should be taken into consideration at all times, especially when there is an incident. I believe OSHA needs to conduct a full investigation in order to determine what actually cause these accidents and unsafe work conditions.
The worksite be in proper working conditions otherwise the employer may face sanctions by the Occupational safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (Moran, 2014). The Occupations Safety and Health Administration plays a vital role in preventing injuries on the job. OSHA’s regular and surprise inspection ensure employers stay in compliance with safety standards or face steep penalties.
If the employer fails to abide by these posting requirements it may result in additional OSHA citations. Note: if a violation was corrected on the spot during an OSHA inspection and you
The one general duty that is obviously met is the meeting minutes being posted in a visible area and readily available for workers. The Occupational Health and Safety Regulations (1996) section 12 states that employers are responsible for the “arrangements for the use, handling, storage, and transport of articles and substances in a manner that protects the health and safety of workers.” In the contracted worksite, employees are wearing street clothing, bare hands and no eye protection, even though there were aprons, safety glasses and rubber gloves hanging nearby. The employer should also be taking care than employees know what chemicals or substances they are handling and is required to implement procedures and processes that are as safe as possible in the handling, use, storage, and transportation of these substances. According to the Occupational Health and Safety Regulations section 319, it is also the employers’ responsibility to ensure all chemicals being accepted by suppliers are affixed with the supplier label.
I would explain to him that all containers and pipes must have a legible label on them written in English. The label will be cross-referenced with the Material Safety Data Sheet and will have a keyword on the label for the employees to easily recognize and find the chemical in the MSDS. I would also instruct him or her to evaluate the employee 's knowledge on what hazards the chemicals pose and for the employee to prove that he or she knows how to look up the chemical by looking at the label and finding the chemical in the MSDS(David
The workers are aware that this examination is important and allows
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) was signed into law on January 29, 1970; it is an agency of the US Department of Labor, having nine directorate offices (Rodrigues, p. 50). It is responsible for creating and enforcing workplace safety and health regulations (Rodrigues, p. 23). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established in December 1970; it is an independent agency of the US Government, having 13 major offices (Rodrigues, p. 55). It was created to enable coordinated and effective government action on behalf of the environment (Rodrigues, p. 16).
The EPA regulations are put in place to protect the environment in terms of controlling the amount of pollution, fumes, oils and gases that are put into the atmosphere from any workshop environment. EPA regulations ensure that any substance being used is disposed of in the correct way and the prevention of illegal dumping of waste this could damage water drainage systems and wildlife. MHO regulations are present for anything that needs the use of human effort. These can be general lifting which involves the use of the back, shoulders, arms , knees, legs and hands when transporting a load. However, MHO regulations assess how to deal with manual handling when there is no other choice but to carry out the manual handling procedure.
Appropriate control measures 2. Induction and training of employees 3. Monitoring and health surveillance activities in order to protect the health of employees who may be exposed to chemicals hazardous to health (CHH). Here are objectives of CHRA: 1. To identify the hazards associated with the handling, use, storage, and transport of chemicals used in the workplace and ; 2.
4.2; Describe ways in which own health or hygiene might pose a risk to an individual or to others at work. Personal hygiene is a big part of being a care worker, and it also makes sure you keep up on your own health and hygiene which makes you deal with the individu-als a lot more respectful and polite. It’s not just about politeness or for personal rea-sons. A lots of different types of illnesses can be transferred through physical con-tact many other ways. Airborne illnesses can be transferred through sneezing and coughing if someone sitting by you sneezing or coughing theirs risk of you getting the airborne illness.
Question #6 The risk-assessment paradigm consists of four primary elements: “hazard identification, dose-response assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization” (Haight, 2012, p. 34). These risk-assessment elements could be applied in any workplace that deals with hazardous chemicals, especially trichloroethylene.