Michael Huemer's Argument Analysis
Michael Huemer believes that the social contract theory is invalid and doesn’t provide enough information about the justifications of authority, and I agree with his claim. Most of the population in the United States today never give consent to the government. A valid consent would need to have an opt out option available. Citizens should have the option to reject policies if wanted. One example of this is in our health insurance. All citizens are required by law to have insurance. This law doesn’t provide consent from the people. There is no opt out option. The option of leaving our country is technically an opt out, but this is not a reasonable option. For every law or bill passed, is it reasonable that if you disagree with anything passed
Chris Mccandless Callarman Argument Analysis
701 Words | 3 PagesCallarman’s argument is that Chris McCandless made a lot of mistakes because he was arrogant and that he had no business going into Alaska with his Romantic silliness and he says that he was just crazy. I disagree with Callarman’s argument because I think that Chris McCandless (Alexander Supertramp) was not arrogant I think that he just wanted to learn new things. I also disagree because I think that Chris did have a reason to go to Alaska or else he would not have done it even if it just to go because he likes nature, and I don’t think that he was crazy at the beginning but I agree that he did start to get crazy when he was stuck in the wild on the bus. I don’t think that Chris is arrogant I think that he is just a guy who wants to learn new things about nature and just the world in general.
Part One Of Thank You For Arguing By Jay Heinrichs
634 Words | 3 PagesIn the Introduction/Part One of Thank You For Arguing by Jay Heinrichs, the author uses real-life examples to inform and entertain the reader about the significance of arguing in society and how to do it efficiently. In order to effectively argue, Jay Heinrichs explains that the individual must first know what their purpose or goal is. An effective argument results in action or choices and by discovering what the speaker wants out of an argument, he/she can form the argument accordingly. Furthermore, Heinrichs states that any issue involving persuasion can fit into the categories: blame, values, and choice. Blame issues should be addressed in the past tense and is named by Aristotle as “forensic” rhetoric because it deals with issues of justice in the courtroom.
Don Marquis Argument Analysis
247 Words | 1 PagesDon Marquis, a theorist on abortion, debated that abortion was morally wrong and that anti-abortionists should consider fetuses’ human beings (Jones & Kooistra, 2011). He stated the term “prima facie” which is Latin for “at first glance”, which means something is accepted as true unless proven to be untrue (Jones & Kooistra, 2011). In Marquis’s argument he stated that it cannot be proven nor disproven that a fetus is considered a living being.
Draper's Argumentative Analysis
644 Words | 3 PagesRecently gaining popularity in light of the recent election, some Californian residents are calling for secession. The idea of secession is not new, especially in instances of political turmoil. In 2012, after former President Obama’s re-election, individuals from states like Texas and Louisiana began petitions that garnered enough signatures for an office of the White House to respond. However, instead of California seceding and becoming it’s own nation, what about splitting the state into two or three states? Dividing into separate states could ease feelings of unjust representation and help the further development in each state’s needs.
Essay On Social Contracts In America
109 Words | 1 PagesSocial contracts in America have been molded around public policy through the years. Public policy is influenced by the citizens of America and the countries stability. Social contracts like the Affordable Care Act (ACA) conveys a political message that the government is establishing a social contract with the citizens of America. The ACA established a social contract with physicians and hospitals by mandating rules and regulations. However, both social contracts have flaws that can hinder physician and patient relationship, care, and cost.
Stephen Douglas Argumentative Analysis
777 Words | 4 PagesThe South was firmly against the admission of California as a free state. Its main fear was the upset of power balance, as Calhoun contended, “the Senate, the last bastion of balance, would be stacked against the South by the end of the decade.” In addition, Meade argued that “[the slaveholding South] needed room to expand,” and that “California was ideal for slavery.” Despite their best efforts, the southerners’ arguments didn’t do much because of the fundamental gap between the North and the South on the issue of slavery; it was nearly impossible for one side to convince the other. In the end, Stephen Douglas put through the admission of California by “getting some men to miss a crucial vote and others to vote with the other side.”
Foner's Argumentative Analysis
468 Words | 2 PagesAn “American” is complex to define for the simple fact that America is structured through the melting pot theory in which different types of people integrate collectively as one. Individuals from all over the world come to a country like America because it is acknowledged for providing humans an improved and more suitable way of living. People are finally able to experience a more preferably life with better opportunities for themselves and their kids. Started that are placed in different locations are their to recognized the change or accomplishment a leader has provided to this nation. However, many African American individuals have been gone and forgotten about because they have not been recognized for their exceptional challenging changes
Bonnie Steinbock's Argument Analysis
782 Words | 4 PagesIn this paper, I will focus on Bonnie Steinbock’s claim on whether or not we should give equal moral consideration to species outside our own species group. I will first determine what moral concern means, according to Peter singer, and explain how he views the human treatment of animals. I will then outline Steinbock’s argument against Singer’s position and explain how her criticism is part of a much broader issue: that is moral concern. I will finally make my argument against Steinbock as well as address any issues she could possibly raise against my argument. Peter Singer believed that all species, whether it be human or non-human, deserve equal consideration of interests and quality of life.
Michael Brown Argumentative Essay
443 Words | 2 PagesPeople rebel when no justice being served. It is understandable why people act a certain way. Have you ever loved someone more than yourself? A person is your biggest pride and joy to be safe? Can you imagine how it feels to no longer have your pride and joy with in a split second, due to the way they look?
Gretchen Weirob's Argument Analysis
357 Words | 2 PagesGretchen Weirob’s argument is based on the view that physical identification is more important towards personal identity rather than psychological features. For example, Weirob believes that a person can identify with their body because they can see their body and it’s certain capacity; the body is very rational. Which is why she would not want her brain to be put into someone else’s body. She believes the body is the unique differentiation to an individual’s identification. Her argument becomes clear when she discusses the idea that someone can be manipulated, put under hypnosis or delusional to think that a different body from Weirob’s is Gretchen Weirob.
Arguments Against ACA
808 Words | 4 PagesSince its passing in 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been overwhelmingly opposed by the majority of Americans (Dalen, Waterbrook, & Alpert, 2015). A key provision of the law was to increase the number of Americans with affordable health insurance. In order to accomplish this goal, the law mandated that all citizens obtain health insurance or face financial penalties. In response to this change, numerous states and lawmakers made many efforts to repeal the law on the basis that the mandate violated individuals’ rights (Hamel, Blumenthal, Abrams, & Nuzum, 2015) Still, the majority of Americans support various provisions within the ACA including provisions that prohibit private insurance companies from denying coverage
Ben Robert-Smith's Argument Analysis
138 Words | 1 PagesIn Ben Robert-Smith’s opinion piece published in the Herald Sun on the 16th of January, 2017 “We Are One but We Are Many”, Robert- Smith addresses he Addresses the Australian public with the argument that is changing the date of Australia day from January 26th. He argues that the date should remain the same but should be undertaken in a manner that is “inclusive and respectful” of other Australian’s interpretation of the day. Comparatively, in Kevin V. Russell’s Letter to the Editor he presents the argument from an alternate perspective.
Mac Donald's Argument Analysis: Hard Data, Hollow Protests
450 Words | 2 PagesHard Data, Hollow Protests I highly disagree with majority of Mac Donald’s argument. Firstly, her inclination that officers “have more to fear from black men than black men have to fear” from the officers does not sit well with me. Although blacks may make up the highest percentage of cop-killers, blacks are more likely to be shot than whites. I suggest that since both facts are true to an extent, social culture and biases have become the driving force for both instances to play out as they are: Black men are more likely to kill cops, cops are more likely to kill black men.
Father Jayme's Argument Analysis
1051 Words | 5 PagesI will outline the argument put forth by father Luis Jayme for support being sent from the Franciscian church to aid both neothytes (Indian converts to Christianity) and gentiles (non-converted Indians), who are allegedly subject to rape from the Portuguese soldiers. Father Jayme Is sympathetic towards the native Indians who he believes act in a better nature than that of the Portuguese soldiers. In summary, Jayme notes of his own Spanish Christians, he writes "I burst into tears to see how these neophytes were setting an example for us Christians"1. The outrageous acts of rape performed by the soldiers referencing personal accounts given to him by the native Americans as his main source of evidence. "some soldiers went their and raped their women .....
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong's Argument Analysis
2349 Words | 10 PagesThis paper will discuss the problem of evil. In the first part, I will discuss Walter Sinnott-Armstrong’s atheist stance and William Lane Craig’s theist stance on the problem of evil. In the final part of this paper, I will argue that Walter Sinnott-Armstrong’s argument is stronger. The Problem of Evil
More about Michael Huemer's Argument Analysis
Chris Mccandless Callarman Argument Analysis
701 Words | 3 PagesPart One Of Thank You For Arguing By Jay Heinrichs
634 Words | 3 PagesDon Marquis Argument Analysis
247 Words | 1 PagesDraper's Argumentative Analysis
644 Words | 3 PagesEssay On Social Contracts In America
109 Words | 1 PagesStephen Douglas Argumentative Analysis
777 Words | 4 PagesFoner's Argumentative Analysis
468 Words | 2 PagesBonnie Steinbock's Argument Analysis
782 Words | 4 PagesMichael Brown Argumentative Essay
443 Words | 2 PagesGretchen Weirob's Argument Analysis
357 Words | 2 PagesArguments Against ACA
808 Words | 4 PagesBen Robert-Smith's Argument Analysis
138 Words | 1 PagesMac Donald's Argument Analysis: Hard Data, Hollow Protests
450 Words | 2 PagesFather Jayme's Argument Analysis
1051 Words | 5 PagesWalter Sinnott-Armstrong's Argument Analysis
2349 Words | 10 Pages