Obedience is a form of social influence where an individual acts in response to a direct order from another individual, who is usually an authority figure such as a policeman. There are several explanations as to why people tend to obey others, for example; The Agentic State. This is when an individual goes through an ‘agentic shift’, where they shift from autonomy to ‘agency’. This means they are now said to be an ‘agent’ who is following the orders of another individual, thus making them feel as though the other individual is responsible for their actions. Therefore, this makes them more likely to commit immoral things as they believe the other individual is to blame. This is supported by Milgram’s experiment as he believes some of the participants …show more content…
In 1974, Kilman and Mann repeated the experiment in Australia, and found that only 16% of their participants went all the way to 450 V. However, when repeated by Mantell in 1971 in Germany, he found that 85% of his participants went all the way to 450 V. The 69% difference could be due to the difference in how their societies hierarchy of authority is structured. From the results, it is evident that some Germans possess the Authoritarian personality; which is a distinct personality pattern characterised by strict adherence to conventional values and a belief in absolute obedience or submission to authority. On the other hand, Australia has maintained a liberal democratic political system in which they ‘seek to balance the fundamental values of liberty, equality and community and in which no-one shall be enslaved by poverty, ignorance and conformity.’ Therefore, suggesting they would be less likely to obey the rules as they believe in equality, so they wouldn’t see the experimenter as being more superior to them. In conclusion, The Legitimacy of Authority is a valid explanation of obedience as it shows how likely people are to obey based on the amount of authority a person
In the Ethnic Theory of Plane Crashes, blind obedience is shown when the flight crew failed to challenge the captain’s poor decision which resulted in the plane crashing. Finally, in the Zimbardo-Standford Prison Experiment, blind obedience is shown when the assigned guards become powerful and abusive towards the prisoners because of the amount of power the guards gained. Unfortunately, whether you like it or not, everyone falls into blind obedience multiple times throughout their life span, and the only way to get out of it? Get more
It is simply just human nature to conform and obey when you are told to do something. Therefore, authority and obedience hold great power in society and what it can do. It can change things so fast and take control with a group of brainwashed
Karen Perez Professor Cirlio English 102 March 7,2023 Formal Essay #2 Final Draft What is obedience? According to the Oxford English Dictionary, obedience is compliance with an order, request, law, or submission to another's authority. Whether individuals are aware of it or not, obedience is an integral part "in the structure of their social lives. " The children are submissive to their parents, and the parents are submissive to their elders. Everyone is subservient to someone, whether it be an employer, the police, or the law; obedience is a part of the social hierarchy.
Americans are not naturally less likely to obey something that they no is wrong. The amount of obedience was highly underestimated. The subjects endured both emotional strain and tension, which was unexpected. 6. What do the results of this study mean in practical terms?
They are being forced to respect every other person and their requests. Such as in the film, A Few Good Men, individuals unconsciously perform obedience to higher ranked personnel, although it’s already enforced. Bringing into the light, no one is born obedient. Being obedient is learned. Who must we be obedient to, how can you tell, what makes it okay to obey?
Obedience in Humans In 1973 the article "The Stanford Prison Experiment" by Philip G. Zimbardo created an experiment to study the daily prison life. Without strict orders, a person would not act out in such a way. Following the rules and staying obedient the whole time is a question Zimbardo wanted to find out. Zimbardo was curious to see if people would conform to the specific role they are performing in order to show obedience.
His experiment was used to demonstrate how people respond to orders from people with authority no matter what the order was. He started by having participants test another “participant”, who actually was one of Milgram’s men who knew what was going on. Each time the fake participant chose the wrong answer, the real participant had to shock them with a higher voltage until they got to one that would be deadly. Milgram changed parts of the experiment to find variables that changed how far the real participant would go. He noticed that location and experimenter’s dress apparel changes how likely it is that the real participant would go to the deadly voltage.
Deception from a moral viewpoint would be something that is seen as wrong, but in a study or experiment for research I think deception is something that is necessary to gain certain knowledge that we wouldn 't be able to gain using regular methods. Usually, the ends justify the means to a deceptive experiments and they usually have good intentions behind them. Many people may be angry after the experiment is over but it is shown that people enjoy an experiment with deception more than an experiment without deception; and people also benefit from them more, educationally. I believe deception is a necessary tool for learning about human behavior and human reaction. Deceptive experiments are experiments that really make you think when the experiment
As stated in our textbook, “Conformity is a change in behavior or belief as the result of real or imagined group pressure.” One can believe that most people will torture an innocent person just because they are ordered to because of the conditioning received since childhood. Obedience is a type of social influence where someone acts in response to a direct order from an authoritative figure doing the influencing. The epitome experiment by Stanley Milgram concluded that most people followed orders from the authoritative figure regardless how immoral the act was. People continued to send electric shock to people knowing that it was causing pain and can possibly lead to death.
We follow orders and obey rules on a day to day basis. When your mom asks you to do something, like putting the dishes away or cleaning your room you do it without thinking about it. Or how about when students sit still and be quiet all day while their teachers are teaching? It's very easy to say that humans are obedient under authorities. According to most study’s findings, most people in positions of authority are more likely to promote acts of evil and less likely to obey a sense of conscience.
While arguably one of the defining psychological studies of the 20th Century, the research was not without flaws. Almost immediately the study became a subject for debate amongst psychologists who argued that the research was both ethically flawed and its lack of diversity meant it could not be generalized. Ethically, a significant critique of the experiment is that the participants actually believed they were administering serious harm to a real person, completely unaware that the learner was in fact acting. Although Milgram argued that the illusion was a necessary part of the experiment to study the participants’ reaction, they were exposed to a highly stressful situation. Many were visibly distraught throughout the duration of the test
Since the beginning of the human existence, man has always dominated and ruled over one another be it empires, corporations, or small groups. Authority and obedience has always been a factor of who we are. This natural occurrence can be seen clearly through the psychological experiments known as The Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment. Both of these studies are based on how human beings react to authority figures and what their obedience is when faced with conflict.
In 1963, a psychologist at Yale University took on an experiment that focused on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. The experiment proved, in a high number of cases, that no matter an individual’s personal conscience, that individual will be obedient to a person of higher rank even in the scene of causing harm to another human being. In the novel Lord of the Flies, author William Golding, presents the idea of obedience in human nature. Furthermore, by introducing the idea that obedience is a major point in human nature.
We have been trained to be obedient to authority. This quality is deep-rooted in us all from the manner in which we were brought up. It is natural for people to obey orders from those whom they recognized as their authority. This is the natural response to legitimate authority and can be learnt in a variety of situations. In a summary written in the article “The Perils of Obedience” (Milgram 1974), states: “The legal aspects of obedience are of enormous import, but they say very little about how most people behave in concrete situations.”
On the other hand, Compliance is where the change in behavior happen due to being asked to do something by another person and in this case you may choose to comply or not to comply but after reconsidering the social rewards and punishments the end result will mostly lead to compliance even if the person doesn’t want to. Lastly, we have obedience in which the person have to obey the order and do it as it comes from an authority figure. In this case there is no freedom of choice in the changing behavior, for example, military officers have to obey all the orders (Changingminds.org, 2017). In reference to our first social influence article which we have used, “Factors affecting the intention to use a web-based