Instilling a cost-conscious culture into the U.S. military
Given its worldwide interests, responsibilities, and commitments in the more volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous world, the U.S. needs to dispose a sufficient budget on defense to ensure promoting national interests and fulfilling international obligations. However, slow growth of the nation’s economy and high percentage of deficit require the Department of Defense (henceforth DoD) to fulfill its missions in more economic manner, in other words, do more or same with less.
Instituting a cost-conscience culture is essential for national security professionals due to its impact on strategic level ramification. At the strategic level, leaders and professionals have responsibilities of formulating ways and means to achieve national objectives (ends). Since 2011, the U.S. defense budget has decreased nearly 20 percent according to
…show more content…
Kotter’s “common errors to organizational change efforts.” They are ‘allowing too much complacency, underestimating the power of vision, permitting obstacles to block new approach.’ First, allowing excessive complacency is one of main drivers for unsuccessful instillation of any new culture into organizational culture. President Obama’s promise to keep the Armed Forces the best in history allows defense leaders to lessen their determination to the cost culture. Secondly, the strategic leaders underestimated the power of vison which guides guide military leaders and personnel to consider their actions with regard to culture of savings accordingly. Thirdly, without a clear vision which includes some consideration of cost culture and with too much satisfaction, some senior leaders, like General Ward, are blocking the culture to persist and sustain. In general, there are challenges thwarting the cost culture to become an integral part of culture of the U.S.
Military spending is also know as a defense budget, the amount of financial resources dedicated by a nation to raise and maintain a country. Since WWII there has been lots of fluctuation of how much the military spends. As we go from president to president we can see constant changes in how much our country spends on the military. In the year 2000 the gross budget of spending was cut to its lowest since 1939. Since then the military has been weaker than it
Assimilation into Military Sub-Culture The military culture is its own culture within the majority culture that is in the United States. This means that those that come into the military have a new set of norms to adjust to and possibly a new set of oppression to face it if applicable to them. With the amount of African American women in the military is increasing and is causing more and more of them to assimilate to the military’s sub-culture.
With the military-industrial complex thriving and burgeoning at Eisenhower’s time, the former president sees that more forces and money are joining the industry. The resulting outcome is today the unbeatable U.S. military, whom its power has been seen and recognized worldwide. Yet, with this mighty force comes an alarming danger. As Eisenhower stated in his speech, the temptation for power and profit is too alluring to be disregarded, and people would do anything to seize this
In fact, the capabilities and capacities called for by the 2014 QDR clearly exceed budget resources made available to the Department”. (Perry Abizaid). However, the Department of Defense is far from suffering like sequestration opponents claim. As Benjamin H Friedman from the Cato Institute points out, defense spending grew “in real terms” 77 percent from 1999 to 2010, adjusted for inflation, reaching levels unseen since World War II. (Friedman)
Reagan, the 40th president of the united states was best known for his acting career before entering the political arena. Reagan’s great public speaking skills , wonderful sense of humor, and little to no experience in politics landed him the highest position in government in the United States of America. He was emowered by his supporter and doubted by skeptics like any ordinary president. Throught it all, history and facts regard him as one of the most effective and accomplished presents of all times. Ronald Reagan’s beliefs about equality transcended the American people’s idea of equality.
The money spent on protecting our country has went up greatly of the years since 9-11.(Green, 2014, para. 7) 9-11 made people to question if our country is really secure. This caused the government to make a lot of polices to help make our country safe for the people living there. These polices focused on security, immigration, defense and etc. One main focus of the government was security.
While structural changes may contribute to shifting organizational culture in some cases, they alone cannot guarantee success. It is crucial for leaders within both agencies to actively promote collaboration and information-sharing through training programs, joint task forces, or other cooperative
Book Review 2: Soldiers, Statesmen, and Cold War Crises by Richard Betts Summary: Betts starts off his book by recognizing the ambiguity around the advocacy of the use of force in a crisis by military leaders even though there is a prevalent assumption that military professionals are more aggressive than diplomats and politicians. He states he writes the book in order to provide a comprehensive survey of the postwar role of American military men in decisions on their most essential function, their use of force in combat. Betts acknowledges the vast availability of literature on military participation in decisions on defense budgets and weapons procurement, but feels there is a void when looking at decision-making from the perspective of military leadership versus civilian leadership.
And the fact the book talks a lot about how the military has lost so many times due to strategic planning that has led to defeat. Seeing this now allows future leaders to know how to lead and to not cause casualties’ when it could possibly be prevented. In the book we Linn tells us how American leaders in the military assumed and therefore ended up in the wrong warfare. For example, Linn stated that: “During the Cold War, when many Americans believed they faced nuclear annihilation or communist dictatorship, the dangers posed a century earlier seemed insubstantial” (Linn, 2007).
The act cut $487 billion from projected defense spending over the next few years. The act also paved the way for sequestration, which would slash an additional $495 billion from the defense budget, for an overall total of almost $1 trillion in
Over the years, the United States military has grown profoundly, with its beginning in colonial America as a small militia, to the largest in the world today. Defense spending has been up and down, with less than 1 percent of GDP in 1929, all the way up to 43 percent in 1944. After WWII, in 1952, the budget was at a high at 15 percent, and then it had decreased down to a low of 3.7 percent just before the September 11th terrorist attacks; an increase then again came (Walker). This shows that the allocation of taxes can differ
On average the US spends nearly 682 billion dollars in defense spending. That is largest defense budget in the world. China and Russia are 2nd and 3rd place when it comes to military spending. If you combined their budgets together America’s budget still dwarfs their spending. Cutting back on the budget wouldn’t mean leaving the US unprotected.
Employees are more familiar with their company culture’s quirks and nuances and may have valuable input on strategy and the design and implementation of new changes. John W. Rowe, Aetna’s fourth CEO in five years, made an exemplary case for this. Instead of launching into changes, Rowe took time to interact with the employees, understand their perspectives and include them in change planning. This let him identify Aetna’s biggest problem and unearth the company’s significant cultural strengths and traits. Realising that Aetna employees would resist an overhaul of organisational culture, Rowe altered his change approach revitalize Aetna’s culture, implementing few interventions, but ones that would result in small but significant behavioural changes.
Army Values Essay The Seven Values are Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, and Personal Courage. The Army Values are important and guide soldiers and leaders to do what is right on a day to day basis within their career. The Army Values are known as the foundation of the army. Even though people know the meaning of these values, not everyone actually lives up to them, but soldiers are taught in Basic Combat Training (BCT) the details of Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, and Personal Courage.
Hence, leaders need to be prepared and manage readiness to the alteration by making an environment of honesty and transparency for their team as a successful implementation of the change is unlikely. Employees must be part of the change hence, they must to be told about the requirement of the change and be given a reward to motivate to embrace the change. If change be accepted by all recipients it can be implemented quickly and effectively. The leaders’ attitudes and behaviors have both positive and negative alterations on the change success. Therefore, leaders of organizations need to try and develop a more framing and shaping behavior, adding skills on themselves to change and motivate the subordinates towards the embracing the change.