ipl-logo

Military Force Essay

573 Words3 Pages

Military Force and Action

Military presence is an effective way to control potentially dangerous or hostile situations. Military force is a quick and effective way of dealing with a large array of situations. While it can be effective military action is not always the best way to deal with every situation. Should the military be the first form of action taken in every situation or should the military be a last resort? Should the military be able to handle a situation using any means necessary or should there be limitations to what they can do?

One major question people ask is would the military be the first form of action taken in every situation or should the military be a last resort? “When exactly is military force justified? …show more content…

Should the military be able to use any means necessary or should there be limitations to what they can do? I feel that if a situation has escalated to the point that military action is required they should be able to handle the crisis by any means necessary to quickly and efficiently resolve the issue. When the military is called into action they can be limited in what they can do and what work can be used.

Should the military be able to act on their own? I don 't think that the military should be able to act on their own. They should be deployed and used in the best interest of the nation and should be accountable for their actions. “The President has authority under the Constitution to take action to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
The States of America in Congress assembled” (U.S. Government Publishing Office). As long as there is good accountability and decisions involving the military are fully thought out and justified I believe that when military action is used it is justified. Some people believe that the military should be able to act on their own. The issue with this based on my personal opinion is that everyone justifies actions differently and for the military immediate action might seem like the best

Show More
Related

  • Blood Of Tyrants Summary

    1036 Words  | 5 Pages

    We have fierce debates today concerning war tactics, drone strikes on Americans, torture, military tribunals, citizens’ rights during wartime, and how to reconcile the needs of the national defense with liberty and self-rule. Does the president have a constitutional power to torture foreign enemy combatants? Overrule Congress on war tactics? Deny formal trials to enemies?

    Read More

  • War Powers Reform Research Paper

    274 Words  | 2 Pages

    This limited the president from essentially “declaring” war by deploying troops at their own whim. With the War Powers Resolution the president must notify Congress within forty-eight hours that they have mobilized troops, after which the troops can stay deployed for sixty days without Congress’s authorization. The president is

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The War Powers Resolution

    1152 Words  | 5 Pages

    The constitution is quite vague and often needs defining. The War Powers act, while primarily insuring collective judgment, also provides a necessary definition for the war powers. The war powers are split between the two, and the only provision directly concerning the matter in Article II of the Constitution is that the president is the commander in chief of the armed forces. What does that entail? If the president could just freely use the troops with no respect for congressional authority, he would never find the need to seek a congressional war declaration, which would be entirely to his advantage and allow him to act unilaterally, which is definitely not how our framers intended our government to work.

    Read More

  • War Powers Act Research Paper

    460 Words  | 2 Pages

    The War Powers Resolution of 1973, more commonly known as the War Powers Act, requires that the President of the United States must inform Congress within 48 hours of sending any of the troops into armed action. The Resolution also prohibits any military personnel from being in a state of war for more than sixty days. This also includes an additional thirty days for withdrawing troops from conflict. After this time period has past, the President is urged to seek a further approval from Congress or a formal declaration of war.

    Read More

  • World War 1 Dbq Essay

    747 Words  | 3 Pages

    World War I was a global war which mainly took place in Europe, involving countries on the Triple Alliance such as Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy and their opposing countries, Russia, France and Great Britain, also known as the Triple Entente. The war took place from 28 July, 1914 until 11 November, 1918, killing more than 9 million combatants and impacting many aspects of a nation. Three of the underlying causes of World War 1 were militarism, alliance systems and nationalism. Militarism is a belief that a country should maintain a strong army which is prepared to defend its country. Countries involved in World War I believed that militarism was important for a country’s pride, success, and honor.

    Read More

  • National Security Council (Cjcs)

    807 Words  | 4 Pages

    The last criteria is suitable, and while the other two criteria may be ok, the suitable is the standard in which we judge the solution as appropriate to a given situation. An example would be given a mission to defeat a certain adversary, and the solution proposed would be apply nuclear weapons to achieve the mission. While this solution may be feasible and acceptable from a purely military standpoint, it would not be suitable, and considered overkill. All three criteria are considered when building strategies and plans to achieve military objectives. All three must be found to be collectively in concurrence for planners to recommend a strategy to a commander.

    Read More

  • The Theories Of Carl Von Clausewitz: The Principles Of War

    1441 Words  | 6 Pages

    According to Clausewitz, military commanders must first be aware of the three most important strategic objectives of war: (1) to conquer and destroy the armed power of the enemy; (2) to take possession of his material and other sources of strength, and (3) to gain public opinion.1 To attain the strategic objectives, Clausewitz requires the application of three decisive military principles: military commanders must apply unrelenting pressure and energy to defeat the enemy; military commanders must mass combat power against the enemy’s vulnerability, creating or revealing additional weaknesses that the attacking force can exploit; and commanders must capitalize on speed, surprise, and shock to destroy the enemy. Clausewitz insists that

    Read More

  • Declaration Of War Dbq

    1044 Words  | 5 Pages

    Similarly, the President ordinarily enjoys broader authority and initiative in foreign affairs. If Congress can constrain the President's use of his inherent Commander in Chief or foreign affairs powers, it follows that Congress can apply at least as strong constraints to the removal power, an unenumerated, allegedly inherent, domestic power. What this has resulted in is the essential ability of the President to order forces into hostilities to repel invasion or counter an attack, without a formal declaration of war. A declaration of war by the Congress places the Unites States at war, but absent a declaration of war, the President can react to acts of war in an expedient fashion as he sees fit.

    Read More

  • Auschwitz Persuasive Letters

    1328 Words  | 6 Pages

    Therefore, we have to act as fast and quick as we are able to if we want to save the lives of millions of innocent

    Read More

  • World War 1 Dbq Essay

    140 Words  | 1 Pages

    MIlitarism is the policy of a glorifying military power, and keeping an army prepared at all times. In document 1, it shows that Germany, France, and Great Britain spent the most on weapons. These countries were the most prepared for war because they had

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Just War Theory

    1164 Words  | 5 Pages

    Unfortunately, there are many people who focus on war as a first resort. It is important to be able to defend and protect your people. As long as the world continues to contain so many problems and so many people willing to start and continue wars, pacifism is too idealistic and not

    Read More

  • Essay On War Powers Act

    479 Words  | 2 Pages

    The constitution attempts to evenly distribute powers between the executive and legislative branches of the federal government by providing the president or the commander-in-chief the power to control and supervise the military upon approval by congress, who have the power to declare war and to support the armed forces. The subject of debate regarding the act is whether the president has the authority to send military troops to war without congressional approval. The way the war powers act was written makes it difficult to decipher approximately how much power is the president privileged in the war-making process. According to the constitution congress have the powers to authorize war by formally granting letters that verify and confirm the

    Read More

  • Armed Force Officer Essay Examples

    1036 Words  | 5 Pages

    Fit to Fight, Fit to LEAD An Armed Force Officer is a special breed Our greatest ASSET is our INTEGRITY We take our every RESPONSIBILITY seriously By our EXAMPLE we LEAD”

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The United Nations Charter

    1556 Words  | 7 Pages

    Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter states that, "all member states shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, nor in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations” . It is therefore a unilateral agreement signed by member states against the use of force when dealing each other. World events however since the signing and ratification of the UN Charter have indicated that states who are signatories to the charter continue to use force against each other for various reasons. Some 25 years after the writing and ratification of the charter one cannot doubt that states have used force and sought to justify it through individual or collective self-defence claims, as well as humanitarian claims in furtherance of national agendas and to increase territory. This no doubt may have been what frustrated Franck into the stance that Article 2(4) was in its grave.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Utilitarianism In The Movie The Island

    1524 Words  | 7 Pages

    The military officer then directs one of the working agents to “open the door “for the people. In this situation, an act utilitarian would view the situation based on bad consequences which encounters and then considers the situation as self-defence for others or moral obligatory in

    Read More

More about Military Force Essay

Open Document