Military Leadership Attributes portrayed in Stephen Ambrose’s Band of Brothers
While reading Stephen Ambrose’s Band of Brothers, I conclude that the recurring theme that is portrayed throughout the book is the value of brotherhood and amazing planning/action in military leadership. The book’s plotline follows Easy Company, 506th regiment, 101st airborne from their days at airborne jump school to the surrender of the NAZI’s in World War II, and the bond of brotherhood and comradeship that they developed over the period.
A major attribute of military leadership that is revisited time and time again is the value of treating the enemy prisoners and casualties the same way they treat their brothers in arms. In the battlefield, rank and personal
…show more content…
The preparation for the D-day mission was the first glaring example of how great planning at all levels to ensure that everyone knows the mission was suppose to take place. The first sign of how this took place over countless rock-drills, briefings and countless meetings within in the platoons of Easy Co. So when it came for the mission and how it didn’t go as how they had planned the men know the end game. They got separated during the drop and continued to drive on and gathered people from other units and made it to there intended objective. I truly believe that this is what made the NCO the backbone of the Army. The freedom these men had to train and punish their troops made them more effective as leaders. The trust that the officers had in the NCO’s and soldiers to train and carry out the mission they had come up with is evident throughout the book. One example of how the NCO’s took the job they had to do serious was here in this part of the book (Lipton was uneasy about leading 2nd platoon on an attack without knowing what was ahead, so he decided to go forward with a radio man to scout the situation in Noville) p 216. He didn’t have to do this but he was so concerned for the well being of his men that he did this and discovered that the Germans still had control of the town. This is not only …show more content…
Military leaders must understand the enemy and enemy movements. With planning you must find not only the strengths and weaknesses of your own men but the enemy as well. This is must in order to achieve a strategic advantage by controlling strategic points or areas in war. For example, the first two operations for Easy Co., Operation Overload and Operation Market Garden where the mission was to drop troops behind enemy lines along the Normandy Coastline and the Netherlands respectively, to secure roads, bridges and areas considered by the Allies to be of tactical importance. A military leader’s first job is to execute planning phase where they must identify locations that must be controlled even before the first bullet is fired. If you are to win the battle controlling strong points for resupply is a must. With securing strong points you will put the enemy on its heels and taking away its strength. The second operation is very important in helping the Allies to take the battle to the Nazi’s by opening up the Rhine. The terrotizing of the enemies own battlefield played a huge part for the allies as it allowed them to minimize the destruction of the allied battle space. This is evident at the end of the war as Germany was left with the ruins of the war. The U.S. and its allies have continued to use this strategy as evident during Gulf War and most recently, during the U.S. invasion
On July 30, 2008, a bloody battle involving Coalition forces took place in the mountainous eastern Afghan province of Nuristan. This was the Battle of Wanat and the devastating amount of Coalition casualties began a vigorous investigation by the United States Army. The village of Wanat, defended by Second Platoon, Chosen Company, Second Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team would fall victim to numerous bad decision made by higher command. Although the men of Chosen Company fought hard, they ended up surrounded, vastly outnumbered, and without any Battalion assets. This paper will argue the reasons for the disastrous outcome of the Battle of Wanat; examining the effective company leadership exploiting effective
currently down which is something that can be used very effectively in the art of war. In World War One we used this tactic again by entering the war when the enemy was already being threatened and attacked. By applying the lessons used in past wars, it allowed us to successfully navigate through future conflicts and battles. Question Two-
This ebook helped answer the research question, “How did General Patton and his tactics affect the outcome of the Battle of the Bulge?”. The ebook details George S. Patton’s life and career, starting from his family’s history in the U.S military, through Patton’s education and early life choices, through battles Patton fought in and ending with his death in December of 1945. The value of the ebook to this investigation is the wealth of information given on Patton. The ebook details fully how Patton behaved and acted while leading his men while also giving information pertaining to his tactics. The ebook’s purpose was to tell Patton’s life and in doing so it provided greatly to this investigation.
“ This operation is not being planned with any alternatives. This operation is planned as a victory, and that's the way it's going to be. We're going down there, and we're throwing everything we have into it, and we're going to make it a success. " This was said by a great military leader named General Dwight D. Eisenhower. This man help make a great turning point in WWII.
In the writing of the book Ambrose gave booth side of the war, from the American soldier as well as the German soldier. He did not lean toward or favor one side above the other. Any time he gave the accounting of an atrocity commented by one side, he would always have the stories from the other side to balance it out. He did not portray the American soldier any better than a German soldier, they all did horrific acts of cruelty during the war. There were also accounts of bravery, compassion and selflessness from both sides.
The planning and execution of this monumental military operation was a feat of incredible complexity (Ambrose, 2013). The strategy relied on the coordination of nearly three million men, 11,000 planes, and 7,000 ships. This required a tremendous amount of planning, as every detail had to be carefully orchestrated to ensure that the invasion was successful. The Allies had to consider every possible factor from weather patterns to the tides. They had to devise a plan which would allow them to surprise the Germans and maximize the potential for success.
General Patton, in the Battle of the Bulge exercised the principles of mission command to the fullest and they yielded significantly great results for the Allied forces. General Patton employed each of the principles in different ways in order to ensure that the German surprise attack did not significantly set back the Allied forces in the war. The exercise of mission command allows a commander to conduct military operations and missions through dispersed execution. According to Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 6-0, Mission Command, the definition of mission command is “the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent to empower agile and adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land operations”. General Patton exhibited four of the mission command principles extremely well during the Battle of the Bulge.
Their optimism and devotion as well as their dexterity to make strategic and sometimes risky plans are characteristics they share, while their devotion and loyalties as well as their personal ideologies contrast. In the midst of detrimental military conflict the attributes of an inspirational leader are reflected in his men, thus ensuring a tenacious and competent
Scribbles on Scrap: A Mission Command Analysis of the Battle of the Little Bighorn The massacre at the Little Bighorn in 1876 was one of the most recognizable battles in American history. The defeat of the 7th Cavalry Regiment and the slaughter of 268 Soldiers by the Sioux serves as an enduring subject of study for contemporary military professionals. The basic modus operandi for command principles in the times of the Indian Wars loosely mirrors the mission command philosophy of today; however, if we still lay credence to the efficacy of the mission command philosophy, how was it that a conventional force under the direction of a battle proven leader was defeated by an irregular enemy? In the end, Lieutenant Colonel George A. Custer’s complacent
Fit to Fight, Fit to LEAD An Armed Force Officer is a special breed Our greatest ASSET is our INTEGRITY We take our every RESPONSIBILITY seriously By our EXAMPLE we LEAD”
Among these five characteristics; military expertise, honorable service, trust, esprit de corps, and stewardship of the profession, I believe that military expertise and stewardship of the profession are the two characteristics that make a leader excel in the presence of their peers. ADRP 1 defines military expertise as, “Military expertise is the design, generation, support, and ethical application of land power, primarily in unified land operations, and all supporting capabilities essential to accomplish the mission in defense of the American people”. In order to gain trust from your subordinates for them to follow your guidance, a leader must have military expertise. Without being an expert in your field, subordinates will not trust your guidance provided unto them. ADRP 1 defines Stewardship of the Profession as, “Stewardship is the responsibility of Army professionals to ensure the profession maintains its five essential characteristics now and into the future”.
The Importance of Accountability in the U.S. Army Every living thing on Earth demands discipline and accountability, but when it comes to U.S. Army, soldiers are trained specifically in these subjects. There are extreme costs at risk if these principles are not held high by the Armed Forces. Most organized Armies focus on the importance of accountability and teach it in the very beginning stages of readiness. Accountability includes things such as showing up on time to safeguarding sensitive records, keeping account of resources to watching out for fellow soldiers. Almost everything can be tied back to the importance of accountability.
Leaders must apply the Army Values when leading soldiers because of the fact that it builds trust and a bond. The same goes for the soldiers, in order for them both to work as an effective team and to get the mission done efficiently they both must live by these values. Once these values are integrated in a soldier’s lifestyle, it becomes too easy to work as a unit. An example on how loyalty and respect fits in a day to day to situation would be, a soldier witnessing a misunderstanding with his or her team leader and a higher ranking NCO, the soldier knows that his or her team leader is in the right. The soldier shows loyalty by standing by their team leader and shows respect by approaching both their team leader and the higher ranking NCO with tact to explain the situation from their understanding and what they witnessed.
Military leadership is the process of influencing others to accomplish the mission by providing purpose, direction, and motivation. Another significant aspect of emphasized by the army is charisma. Therefore, army strategy to have a great leader is to choose people with high charisma since follower are always drawn to leaders with charisma. By having a high charisma they can command the follower easily. The basic task of a leader are: achieve the mission with zero fatality.
So here is the long version to keep at the back of your head: Ask for help from the people closest to you (proximity wise meaning in front of you) by telling them what your ultimate goals are and what is really going on in your head. Then ask them who could help you. Don't directly ask for help. If you do that then you are essentially demanding, begging, and putting them on the spot. Instead, give them the opportunity to help you on their own terms.