Military Revolution Essay

1537 Words7 Pages
Conclusion The Social Impacts of Military Revolutions The emergence of the Japanese Pikemen and the European Arquebusier brought forth radical changes in military tactics, yet as shown, their forthcoming resulted in more than just evolution on the battlefield. Since the democratization of violence and decentralization of power drive all military revolutions, it is not unreasonable to assert that there could be trends which describe the social impact of military revolutions. With this in mind, despite being two separate civilizations, there are clear connections between Medieval Japan’s relationship with the Ōnin War and Medieval Europe’s experience with the Italian Wars. There are six of them. These civilizations were technologically different, yet the negligible effect this has on making these trends allude to more than sheer coincidence. Perhaps these trends could help explain other military revolutions. Regardless, these six trends help describe how these two medieval societies responded to the military revolutions that challenged the military thinking, power structures, and cultural views of their time. The zero-sum game of weapons is the first trend. In both societies, it is quite clear that horsemen rapidly lost favor on the battlefield as pikemen or arquebusiers…show more content…
Why exactly is there so little discrepancy between each society? Six trends are a lot in common for two societies that coexisted on the opposite ends of the globe. Perhaps there is/are some larger factor(s) at work here. One potential explanation is the limited scope of the research. The Medieval time period’s slow communication was an incredibly important factor in being able to defend the validity of these six trends. This statement is also true for the similar feudal structure and the matching time period. Are these three parameters the larger factors at work which explain these six trends or is there more to
Open Document