ipl-logo

Ministerial Responsibility In Australia

452 Words2 Pages

Ministerial responsibility is based on a body of constitutional conventions; it ensures the accountability of the government to the people of Australia. Ministerial responsibility is the responsibility to the parliament by a minister or on a minister’s behalf for actions taken. Ministerial responsibility is a policy that ministers in a government depend on maintaining the support of the parliament. The underlying legal concepts are The Rule of Law, Democracy and the Constitution. The Rule of Law, relates as big decisions about the country are subject to the law. If they break the law, they will go through the same legal processes as everyone else. Democracy, checks the spread of power across different groups, preventing one person from controlling the nation. The Constitution, makes the Members of Parliament take an oath, when being elected. This means they will act in the best interest of the country.
Mal Brough was born on December 29, 1961in Brisbane, Queensland. He was elected into the House of Representatives in 2013, he has been elected many ministerial appointments including, Minister for Revenue & Assistant Treasurer in 2004, although his most recent ministerial position was, Minister for Defence Material and Science in 2015. Mal Brough resigned on the 29th December 2015, after the Federal Police of Australia …show more content…

I believe the important thing in parliament is to be subject to the Constitution and Rule of Law. This is to ensure that every one of Australia is treated the same way, equally and fairly. The Constitution provides the basic ruled of government and the Rule of Law ensures that everyone is subject to the law. I believe that the current system couldn’t be improved, this is due to that the current system is fair and deals with issues in parliament

Show More
Related

  • Jean Jacques Chretien Impact On Canadian Politics

    1981 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Prime Minister is responsible for leading the country and moving the country forward. In the 1990’s the man that wielded this power was Joseph Jean Jacques Chretien. Chretien was the Canadian Prime Minister from 1993-2003 and served a total of three terms in office representing the liberal party. During Chretien first term in parliament his liberal party formed a majority government, however their main oppositions were regional powers in the reform party in Western Canadian and Quebec based Bloc Quebecois (Bothwell, "Jean Chrétien."). These regionals power in parliament were symbolic of the growing discontent amongst Canadians.

    Read More

  • Key Social, Economic, And Political Issues That Led To The Rebellions Of 1837-1838

    567 Words  | 3 Pages

    The only elected position in the government was the Legislative Assembly. The other government positions were appointed by the governor. The Governor appointed the Lieutenant Governor's, one was in charge of Upper Canada, One was in charge of Lower Canada. They appointed the Legislative Council and the Executive Council. Eventually, responsible government was granted to Canada, first in Nova Scotia in January 1838, then, later in all of

    Read More

  • Re Senate Reform Analysis

    1604 Words  | 7 Pages

    This means that if the legislature can abolish of change the nature of the Senate in such a way that there is an imbalance in the check and balances of the Canadian political system then this power is weak and without effect. Thus, this paper will examine the response of the Supreme Court to these questions, in order to determine how it interprets the power of the legislature and the role of the Senate within Canadian politics. It will do this by examining the primary text alone and any case law examined by the Supreme Court in this

    Read More

  • Should Electoral College Be Abolished Dbq Essay

    749 Words  | 3 Pages

    Giving back the power of the people will solve many debating issues in the election system. Take away the majority and give back the power to the individual

    Read More

  • How To Abolish The Senate In Canada Essay

    344 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, abolishing the Senate may not be the best for Canada in the end, so another argument is to reform the Senate. The best plan at the moment to reform the Senate is the Triple E plan, as it would make it so that the Senators are elected, each province is represented equally, making the Senate more effective. If we were to abolish the Senate the only way to do so would be by a constitutional amendment backed by at least seven provinces representing 50 per cent of the population, or one with unanimous provincial

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: We Should Keep The Senate In Canada

    875 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Senate: “The upper chamber of Parliament where there are 105 members who are appointed until age 75 by the Crown on the advice if the prime minister.” (Rules of the Game pg 106)The original Senate that was created in 1867 had only originally 72 seats. It was created to counter balance representation population in the House of Commons, although in recent years the Senate has become to reinforce representation of groups that have often been underrepresented in parliament, examples; Aboriginals, visible minorities and women. There has been a huge debate’s on whether Canada should keep the Senate. The people all over Canada have mixed opinions on if we should keep the Senate or not.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Queensland's Unicameral System

    510 Words  | 3 Pages

    This argument remains valid in modern debates as the absence of an upper house continues to severely restrict the possibilities by which legislation can be evaluated and amended (Costar 2015). Although it has been determined that the upper house alone is not the cure for attaining an answerable government, it is said that by re-introducing a second chamber in Queensland, a number of valuable functions can be performed. Functions such as the review of legislative proposals at a ministerial and departmental level as well as the control and limit of political power and the ability to protect human rights can be carried out in a way that is not possible alone by a lower house nominated by the government (Aroney 2008, 28). Not only does the upper house act as an extra technique to review and amend changes to legislature, it also has had a profound effect on the ability of the Queensland Parliament to correctly carry out its functions under the Constitution which compel it to act responsibly and review the undertakings of the executive arm of

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Triple E Senate

    388 Words  | 2 Pages

    Their main role is to provide a final check on the legislation passed in the House of Commons. Some people believe this isn't necissary and that we should not spend so much money on it. Additionally, some people feel that we are alreadt overgoverened in this country. We have municipal governments, urban hamlets, towns and villages, rural municipalities, countries, school boards, hospital boards, provincial governments, the federal House of Commons, and the Senate. Some people think that

    Read More

  • Essay On Australian Democracy

    1267 Words  | 6 Pages

    In a democracy, the rule of law defends the rights of citizens, upholds order, and bounds the power of government. All people are equal under the law. The rule of law. Martin Krygier, Professor of Law at the University of New South Wales, argues that there are four essential principles underlying the rule of law. They are universality of the scope of the law, clarity for all citizens, supportive and culturally appropriate institutions and an appropriate legal culture.

    Read More

  • Values Of Individualism In Canada

    604 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rule of law is essentially the shared values of a people. Rule of law also means that no matter who you are Prime Minister, richest man/woman on the planet, or the most famous person alive the law is no different and that is where the whole concept of justice is blind comes

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Canada Senate

    1949 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Senate in Canada should be abolished Introduction: Canada senate is a part of legislation institution in Canada, which represents the interests of upper class people. Different from America, it is not produced by election but directly-nominated by the premier and appointed by governor. Senate, governor, and the House of Commons are like three legs of a tripod which constitute the congress and legislation system in Canada. Senate undertakes the responsibility of proposing expostulation to governor and cabinet, which acts the role of supervision and restriction. Senate played critical role when Canada established federal government in 1867, the diversity of senators warrants the smooth convey of popular will to governors and legislators coming from different ethnic group and social status.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Council Of Australian Governments

    447 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although the six states joined together to form the Commonwealth of Australia, they still each retain the power to make their own laws over matters not controlled by the Commonwealth under Section 51 of the Constitution. State governments also have their own constitutions, as well as a structure of legislature, executive and judiciary. But, as law and its administration become more complicated, members of the federal, state and local executives are required to work together in order to solve problems. In 1992 the federal government established the Council of Australian Governments (COAG), which includes the Prime Minister, state premiers, chief ministers and the president of the Australian Local Government Association, who meet twice a year to discuss intergovernmental matters. In 2008 the federal government set up the Australian Council for Local Government, so it could work directly with local government as well.

    Read More

  • Argument In Relation To Prorogation In Canada

    1686 Words  | 7 Pages

    There is simply no good reason to allow a leader to prolong the inevitable collapse of their government. It could be reasonably contended that if this reform was put into place, a two-thirds opposition government could use prorogation to their partisan advantage. Though incredibly unlikely, this is a phenomenon that could occur, and so it must be addressed. Only one collation government has ever existed at a federal level is post-confederation Canada. This combined with the sheer unlikelihood of an opposition gaining two-thirds of the seats discredits the arguments merit.

    Read More

  • Conventional Roles And Powers Of The Governor General

    1064 Words  | 5 Pages

    As the Prime Minister is appointed by the Governor General and is a Minister of State, the Governor General was well within his Constitutional reserve powers to dismiss Whitlam. 2. Appoint a new Prime Minister to replace Gough Whitlam. This new Prime Minister was the Opposition Leader, Malcolm

    Read More

  • Importance Of Law In Our Daily Life

    709 Words  | 3 Pages

    What I will explain to you in this article will, how we are connected with the law and I hope, make you see sense in the importance of our laws in the society we live in. To be against the importance of laws in our society would show one to be ignorant and naïve. I encounter the law on a daily basis when I am driving. I have to follow the speed limit of each road, I have to signal before changing lanes, my vehicle must be in good condition in order to safely drive and I must obey all road signs as they are set in place to ensure the safety of everybody.

    Read More

More about Ministerial Responsibility In Australia

Open Document