ipl-logo

Miranda Vs Arizona Court Case Essay

1005 Words5 Pages

Ernesto Miranda was tried for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old female. When they brought him in, the girl was not able to positively identify him in a lineup (Miranda V. Arizona). He was then interrogated for two hours by two of the officers that arrested him. At the end of the interrogation, Ernesto wrote and signed a confession (United States Courts). Ernesto was tried in Phoenix Arizona, but his lawyers said that the trial was unfair and that his 5th and 6th amendment rights had been violated due to the fact that Ernesto was never told his rights (Miranda V. Arizona). In Phoenix, Arizona, March of 1963, an immigrant named Ernesto Miranda was arrested inside his house for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old female (Miranda V. Arizona). He was interrogated for two hours before officers brought in the …show more content…

This court’s decision was that Miranda’s rights were not violated (United States Courts). Ernesto wasn’t happy with this decision, so he appealed it. The Arizona Supreme Court also decided that Miranda did not have any rights violated due to the fact that Miranda supposedly never asked for an attorney (Oyez). Miranda said he had asked for one, but was denied one (Miranda V. Arizona). Miranda then found other people who had the same problem as him. They all got together and made a petition to get the U.S. Supreme Court involved (Legal Dictionary). They succeeded and brought the issue all the way up to the Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court made a different decision than the other two courts. They had decided that Ernesto did have his rights violated due to the fact that the officers who interrogated Ernesto admitted to not advising him of his rights. The U.S. Supreme Court found that the rights that were violated fell into the 5th and 6th amendment (United States Courts). This decision was decided by only a 5-4 vote majority (Oyez). This vote was lead by Chief Justice Warren (Legal

Show More
Related

  • Pete Ernandez Case Study

    334 Words  | 2 Pages

    ernandez versus the state of Texas was one of the first Mexican American civil rights cases heard here by the United States Supreme Court (author, year). This case was one of the most important cases that considered Mexican Americans to be their own racial group in the United States. Pete Hernandez was a Mexican American agricultural worker, who was accused for the murder of Joe Espinosa in Edna, Texas in Jackson County (author,year). Hernandez’s lawyer knew that this was going to be a challenge since Mexican-Americans seemed to be excluded in the jury’s selection in seven counties in Texas. When on trial, Hernandez’s legal team did claim that other Mexican Americans were excluded from the jury commission.

    Read More

  • Research Paper On Miranda Vs Arizona

    305 Words  | 2 Pages

    Miranda v. Arizona In 1966 Ernest Miranda was arrested at his home and taken to a police station where he was identified by the complaining witness. After a 2 hour interrogation he was found guilty of kidnapping and rape. He confessed all of this without being read his rights. The police did not read him his rights that are stated in the 5th amendment.

    Read More

  • Case Summary Of The Miranda V. Arizona Brief Case

    539 Words  | 3 Pages

    Miranda’s attorney appealed to the U.S Supreme Court which were going to hear his case. In the Trial Court a counsel was appointed to defend him in the robbery and rape and kidnapping case. Identify the issue (IRAC): Was it the officers right to inform the suspect of his 5th and 6th amendment before interrogating him?

    Read More

  • Miranda V. Arizona Case Brief

    870 Words  | 4 Pages

    The case was later taken to the supreme court where the previous sentence was overturned by a 5-4 vote in favor of Miranda due to the fact that his constitutional right were violated (not being informed of his rights). Besides the defendant, Ernesto Miranda, others involved in the case were people such as: the unidentified female victim,

    Read More

  • Miranda Vs Arizona Case Study

    581 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to History,” A statement obtained without compliance with these rules is inadmissible as is the fact that a defendant has chosen to exercise the right to remain silent ‘in the face of accusation.’” (History). This case originated in Arizona, argued on February 28, 1966 and decided on June 13, 1966. The “majority opinion was written by Chief Justice Warren and joined by Justices Black, Douglas, Brennan and Fortas” (United States Courts). The dissenting opinion were “Justice Harlan and joined by Justices Stewart and White” (United States Court).

    Read More

  • Police Exception Questions: Miranda V. Arizona

    687 Words  | 3 Pages

    Arizona case stated that a criminal suspect must make a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary decision to waive certain constitutional rights prior to questioning (Ortmeier, 2006). These constitution rights consisted of their right to remain silent; to be given an explanation on how anything they say can be used against them; their right to an attorney; and their right to have an attorney appointed to represent them if they cannot afford one. Additionally, Metgzar (2010) indicated without rights advisory, anything admitted by a subject in an interrogation will not be useable in there trial. The ruling also encouraged the expansion of Fifth Amendment and other constitutional

    Read More

  • Essay On The Civil Rights Case Of Anders Vs Texas

    1386 Words  | 6 Pages

    The civil rights case of  Hernandez .vs. Texas was settled in The Supreme Court on the 3rd of May 1954, changing the lives of Mexican Americans everywhere. Attorneys Gus Garcia, Carlos Cardena, and John Herrera took on a case involving a Mexican man named Pete Hernandez, who was being sentenced to prison on a murder charge. The attorneys wanted to take Petes case because they believed he was being tried unfairly considering,  he was sentenced by a jury of  all Anglo people. In order for a case to be properly decided, the defendant must be questioned in front of a jury of his own peers to insure  that there will not be prejudiced in the jury's ruling.

    Read More

  • The Supreme Court Decision Of 1954 In The Case Of Hernandez V. Texas

    721 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court’s decision of 1954 in the case of Hernandez v. Texas was the start of a breakthrough for Mexican Americans in the United States. The case was brought to existence after Pete Hernandez was accused of murder in Jackson County, a small town called Edna, Texas. The special thing about this case that makes it significant was the jury that were including in this trial. It was said that a Mexican American hadn’t served on a jury in the county of Jackson in 25 years. With the help of a Mexican American lawyer, Gustavo Garcia, the case was brought to the highest court level and was beheld as a Violation of the constitution.

    Read More

  • Overview Of Miranda Ruling

    861 Words  | 4 Pages

    In March of 1963 a Mexican born immigrant named Ernesto Miranda living in the city of Phoenix, Arizona was chosen in a police lineup by an 18 year old woman who was accusing him of kidnapping and raping her. Miranda was then arrested and questioned by police for several hours before he confessed to the crimes both verbally and in writing. Miranda signed several forms when he confessed to the crimes, including one stating that his confession was completely voluntary and that he understood all his rights. But during the interrogation the police officers did not tell Miranda that he had the right to remain silent, a right granted to him by the Fifth Amendment.

    Read More

  • Miranda Vs Arizona Injustice

    769 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the case of Miranda vs. Arizona (1966), Miranda was arrested at his home and taken into custody for questioning. The interrogation lasted for two hours and the complaining witness identified Miranda as the suspect. As a result, Miranda signed a written confession. At trial when the information was presented to the jury, they found Miranda guilty of kidnapping and rape and was charged 20-30 years of imprisonment on each count. Miranda appealed the case to the Supreme Court of Arizona which ruled that his constitutional rights were not violated by obtaining his confession.

    Read More

  • Miranda Case Brief Summary

    1530 Words  | 7 Pages

    After Miranda’s trial and conviction, his lawyers appealed stating Miranda’s confession was forced. The case went to the Supreme Court with three others (O’Brien 1103). 3. Questions of the Court Do police violate the Fifth Amendment if they fail to tell the suspect of his rights to silence and counsel? 4.

    Read More

  • Importance Of The Fifth Amendment

    94 Words  | 1 Pages

    The sixth amendment gives any citizen in the United States of America, the rights to a legal counsel when accused of a crime. When Ernesto was arrested and was interrogated for over two hours, he was never told once about his rights to an attorney. Then it allowed the police to receive a confession out of him to use in court, which also valuated the fifth amendment. The fifth amendment say that a person can not be a witness to themselves, which means that Ernesto confession was not valid evidence to us in court.

    Read More

  • Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    890 Words  | 4 Pages

    Arizona, Were his rights violated? It is obvious that Ernesto 's rights were not clear to him. Before his interrogation, Miranda was unaware of his rights and when he made his confession, they were entirely thrown out. In 1965, the court agreed to heir his case. Miranda 's case won 5-4 and a statement was made.

    Read More

  • Pursuit Of Justice: The Miranda Rights

    114 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Miranda rights purpose was to create a balance between law enforcement in their pursuit of justice and the suspect’s right to fairness. The Miranda today stands for the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination and due process and the right to counsel of the sixth amendment. It serves as a level playing field between all parties involved. Even today the Miranda law continues to be tested by law enforcement in the pursuit of getting a confession. Law enforcement relies on two things when approaching a criminal investigation: 1.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of The Miranda Warning

    211 Words  | 1 Pages

    2016 marks the nation’s fiftieth anniversary of the Miranda rights or known as the Miranda warning. The Miranda rights made a monumental impact in our country. The Miranda Rights gives suspects their acknowledgement of their rights while being taken into custody. The rights are the right to remain silent and the right to attorney. One of the rights is the right to remain silent.

    Read More

More about Miranda Vs Arizona Court Case Essay

Open Document