“But this momentous question, like a fireball in The night, awakened and filled me with terror. I considered it at once as the knell of the Union” (Jefferson). This is from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Holmes in 1820 talking about the issue of slavery and the Missouri Compromise, and Thomas Jefferson was afraid that the Congress may keep on compromising to satiate the south’s want for slavery. The people in the north and the south kept I arguing till the Civil War, whether slavery should be continued or if they should get rid of this abominable institution, but Henry Clay did not want there to be a civil war so he helped write a compromise to keep the peace between the feuding halves of America dreaming that peace would be achieved. Even though many people in the south of America through the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would be beneficial, it ultimately failed, and it only postponed …show more content…
During this time they were several things that were happening. The Congress earlier passed it's the compromise that there would be a line which was named the 36° 30’ line, which slavery was not allowed to cross but Missouri wanted to enter the Union as a slave state. Is there anywhere to route to enter the slave state north. This was unfair to the northerners because the addition of Missouri as a slave state would unbalance the seats in Congress, so Maine wanted to enter the country as a free state, but they were not able to get enough votes until March 4 and it was entered as the second half of the Missouri compromise as part of the Missouri Compromise but Maine did not want to be included in the compromise. A man who lived in Maine wrote a poem about how main should not participate in the compromise because it was unhealthy and that they should just be allowed to become a free state, but even with their attempts main was still entered as the second half of the Missouri
It can be argued that the Missouri Compromise not only put off the start of the Civil War, but was also a cause. Many contributing factors led up to the Civil War in the years following the passing after the Missouri Compromise. Years after the Missouri Compromise went into effect, Congress passed the Tariff Act of 1833, sometimes called the Compromise Tariff. This was proposed by Henry Clay, and called for the gradual reduction of tariffs, ending the Nullification Crisis. In 1846, United States’ President James Polk requested 2 million dollars to purchase land from Mexico following the Mexican-American War.
In The Clay Compromise Measures, Calhoun—although too sick to deliver the speech himself—challenges the Senate to honor the desires of the South and respect the region’s efforts to thwart the North’s impending influence over the South’s economic state. Calhoun
The Missouri Compromise was a significant turning point in United States history, it lead to many discussions on slaves civil rights, the Dred Scott decision, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In a sense, the Missouri Compromise impaired the unity of the United States and was the original fuel for the civil war. As states were expanding westward after the Louisiana Purchase, so was the debate of slavery. The North did not rely on slavery because it was unprofitable after the American Revolution.
The Crittenden Compromise and Alexander H. Stephens’s “Corner Stone” speech are two significant pre-Civil War sources that serve to give students of history insight about the ultimate cause of secession and the War: slavery. Both documents discuss the issue but from different angles. The first document, The Crittenden Compromise, was a midnight hour attempt to prevent the Union from splitting in two. It presented six articles for amending the Constitution and four resolutions for Congress.
By the early 1850s settlers and entrepreneurs wanted to move into the area now known as Nebraska. However, until the area was organized as a territory, settlers would not move there because they could not legally hold a claim on the land. The southern states' representatives in Congress were in no hurry to permit a Nebraska territory because the land lay north of the 36°30' parallel — where slavery had been outlawed by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Just when things between the north and south were in an uneasy balance, Kansas and Nebraska opened fresh wounds. The person behind the Kansas-Nebraska Act was Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois.
Politics were was the most vital part of the Civil War, arguments over slavery, secession, and civil rights headed the political field. Henry Clay(1777-1852) was a powerful force in politics during and before the Civil War Era, Clay was a U.S. congressman, senator, presidential nominee, a foremost proponent of the “American System”. Clay’s experience in the politics gave him the name the “Great Compromiser” due to brokering important agreements during the Nullification Crisis and the issue of slavery. Clay was a dominant member of the Whig party and was a high ranking senator and representative in the House of Representatives, but Clay’s most important contribution to the Civil War were his deals to compromise over the status of slavery in
The North never wanted the South to break away from the union. A prominent senator from Kentucky, Henry Clay rose to fame when he was younger as a war hawk in the war of 1812. Now as an older man, he understood the costs of war and wanted to avoid it. He was certain that the South would never fully go through with the threat of secession and that they were just bluffing (Document 1). While the North thought that the South would never secede, it eventually did, and that destroyed the compromises that were created.
What impact did the Missouri Compromise have on future territories and their entrance to the union? To understand the Missouri Compromise fully, understanding the events that took place prior to 1820 is essential. The War of 1812 ended with “the Federalist Party all but destroyed.” After the fall of the federalist party, we entered a time period called the Era of Good Feelings. It received this name “due to the one-party dominance” . The party dominating the political elections and the U.S Congress was the Democratic-Republicans also referred to as the Jeffersonian Republicans.
A similar event was the Missouri Compromise. Congress made a two-part compromise by allowing Missouri in as a slave state and Maine in as a Free state, to even the balance in Congress. It sounds a lot similar to the Compromise of 1850, 30 years after the Missouri Compromise. Another event that is similar to the Compromise of 1850 is the Democratic and Republicans parties in today's society. America has split into two sides again, with people having different strong opinions.
In an attempt to improve the situation, Northern congressmen were quick to bring up that many of the South's most respected statesmen, either Thomas Jefferson, had often expressed a desire to find any solution of perpetuating slavery. So far now the South presented a virtually solid opposition and Thomas Jefferson joined their campaign which were required to force manumission upon a new state. Many days of arguments in the congress debates between the Northern and Southern congressmen about the Missouri controversy and the way headed the sessions were portending that the next era will initiate to a recurring sectional no way. Later on, this arguments will be a main and important reason in the civil war
The Compromise of 1850 The Compromise of 1850 can been identified as a significant event in American history, as it helped to avert a looming Civil War. It was seen as a solutions to growing conflicts between the North and the South. The bills included five major elements that addressed issues such as slavery, the Mexican Cession, and the territories of California and Utah. The Compromise aided in attempts to amend issued between pro and anti-slavery groups.
Slavery was a big issue in the 1800s. It divided the country into an argument between having slavery or not having slavery. It also made a conflict between the north and south and they could not agree on it. Some wanted to keep it, some wanted to get rid of it. The states would argue and they could not come up with a compromise.
These attempts at compromise and keeping the Union together, while working for a time being, were not properly enforced, and they always seemed to anger one side. The Missouri Compromise was one of the first controversial compromises that encountered the issue of expanding slavery. While Henry Clay created the majority of the two-part resolution, which stated that Missouri would enter the U.S. as a slave state while Maine would enter as a free state and that “slavery was to be excluded from all new states in the Louisiana Purchase north of the southern boundary of Missouri” (U.S. History, 2008-2014), many people viewed the comprise as being extremely flawed. While the Compromise
The issue the compromise was about was whether there should be slavery in the western territories. Maine wanted to be added to the Union, however, slavery was banned there. If Maine were to be added to the Union, it would upset the balance between free and slave states in the nation and the Senate. So, the Missouri Compromise, proposed by Senator Henry Clay, allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state, and allowed Missouri to be entered into the Union as a slave state.
Last month, we learned the Missouri Compromise, the Monroe Doctrine and American System. These three events were important for me to review against, I deem. The Missouri Compromise was worked out in 1820. The Congress had a serious problem about balance. Missouri became one thing that could break this balance.