Modern democracies can be defined by there representativeness. This is why the electoral system is at the centre of democratic regimes. Since the first representative democracies, electoral systems have evolved and shaped the political system of countries. Thus, the question of the effect of electoral laws on the political system can be raised. The electoral laws form the legal framework that determines the transfer of votes into seats in political institutions. To what extent can electoral laws have an impact on the functioning of the political system? Electoral laws have an impact on the functioning of the political system by influencing the behaviour of the voters and political party. As a matter of fact, the number of political parties …show more content…
Initially this idea touches the notion of government and policy making by having an impact on their effectiveness and responsiveness. The effectiveness of a government is a measurement of its strength in term of policy making. Hence, a strong government is a government that is stable and follows one party-line. Therefore, the plurality model is to be favoured in this cases since its single-party government will be stronger. The case of the United States illustrate well this idea, since the democratic and republican party cannot share a coalition, the government will be less likely to collapse. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of the government is only true when the legislative body colour corresponds to the government’s. Otherwise, the political system can go through a political gridlock, when for instance the Republican party won the majority in the Congress while B. Obama, a Democrat president were still in office. In addition, the responsiveness of a government varies according to the electoral system in use. The responsiveness is its ability to transfer public opinion into policy making. In fact, the members of the government are accountable to their voters and sometimes even to the parliament in the case of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom who can face a vote of non-confidence from the House of Commons. Therefore, in …show more content…
As a matter of fact, according to the party structure in a political system, government and legislation will be more or less effective or responsive. Thus, beyond parties, proportional representation systems are more prone to fairness among voters and proportionality in their representation in the political system. Whereas, majoritarian systems tend to be more effective in terms of policy-making. On a final note, mixed electoral systems can be envisaged as a middle-ground solution for electoral laws to be chosen. Although, this still recent model will requires more time for us to assess
The United States government is one of the most admired and complex in the world, On the contrary one of the fundamental components that has an extensive impression on the American People and the Election is the Electoral College. Our founding fathers created The Electoral College over two hundred years ago, and it is still in effect today. They feared that having just the Popular Vote would give too much power to one person. In this paper, we will be discussing what the Electoral College is, the benefits and disadvantages of the Electoral College as well as if the Electoral College should be abolished or reconstructed.
The Electoral College is an antiquated process the founding fathers established in the Constitution as a compromise to elect a president not from a vote in Congress or popular vote of qualified citizens. But by both The Electoral College process consists of the selection of the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for President and Vice President, and the counting of the electoral votes by Congress. The College consists of 538 electors, which a majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the President. States are entitled an allotment of electors equals the number of members in its Congressional delegation: one for each member in the House of Representatives plus two for your Senators.
There are many different types of minor parties, one of them being the Constitution Party. This party is a national political party in the United States. The members who founded this organization included Darrell Castle and Director Howard Phillips. The principles that are set in the Constitution Party were also found in the Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, The Constitution and the Bible. The goal of this party is to limit federal government to its delegated, functions.
One brought together illustrative government; a various country could flourish, ruled by the larger part, yet with a decent measure of thought for
Pluralism is when a group of diverse minorities work together to govern. Many groups come together to help govern and influence others. This is an accurate way to describe American politics because it’s more like a democracy, where people of different backgrounds and groups can come together and voice their opinion, rather than a single person dictating the decisions (Reynold, 1999). A pluralistic government also has many centers of power, like the American government (Janda, 2008). The American government has many layers of power: the local government, the state government, and the federal government.
Creating the U.S. Constitution and the democratic values that are associated with, the Founders had some oversight concerning democracy. The electoral college an undemocratic idea within a democratic society. The people vote and, depending on the state, the electors either vote on the outcome of the popular vote or vote what they think. That create a less democratic environment all together. By using the electoral college, the government becomes less of a direct democracy.
It allows them to use tactics such as packing and cracking which can have a tremendous impact on elections. Packing is when politicians draw out district maps for each party based on population. Packing can swing the vote because the population of one party could out weight the population of the minority party within the same district, causing the entire district to swing with the majority. Voters feel that the other tactic, cracking, gives them a disadvantage because the political parties are being spread out between multiple districts which causes one district to have the majority party in multiple areas (King, Elizabeth). When the politicians of the party in power have drawn out the voters’ map, they maintain power over the lines of the map.
One of the things that makes America so great is its election process. The US elections are fair and not rigged by the people in power(as far as the public knows.) Despite this, there are still some people who try and get the elections to go one way. This is called voter fraud. Voter fraud can take many different forms, switching ballots, tampering with results, pressuring voters, and voting in the place of others.
When the Great Compromise was drafted and reached at the constitutional convention of 1787 it was did make sense to allow each state, regardless of population, to have to have an equal number of senators, as this allowed each state to have a voice within the Senate. It also made sense for purpose of legislature that the number of delegates from each state within the House of Representatives was based on each state’s population as it allowed for a semi true representation of the populations within all states. The representation was only semi true as the states only counted select portions of the people within the state, omitting women, Native Americans and only counting 3/5ths of the slave population. As to whether this same calculation is fair for Electoral College purposes, I do not believe that it is.
INTRODUCTION The United States political structure is one of the most conducive and great political system in the world. One of the most popular aspects of it is the two party system, and the well-known Democratic and Republican parties. There are three major party systems in the world and they are one-party system, two-party system and multi-party system. This essay will analyse the two party system in the United States (U.S.), their structure and the benefits of a two party system in a states.
The power struggle between the two main parties causes conflict within governments and between governments and their people when the people are not properly represented, and trifectas can cause bills that represents a minority of the overall population to quickly become law and legislations, distancing themselves from the people that they are supposed to govern. Minorities, such as women and people of color, are underrepresented under a two-party system, and third and independent parties rarely get elected seats. In the end, America would benefit from a new system that would create more options and provide better representation than the current two-party system that is in place. As J.T. Young
In order to compare and contrast varying types of government within two or more countries, one must have a clear definition of Government and know the purposes it serves. Therefore, I did some research and I have established that Government is a group that exercises dominant power over a nation, state, society or other body of people. Governments are commonly responsible for constructing and implementing laws, handling money, and defending the general population from external threats, and may have other obligations or privileges. All over the world, there are many different types of government within countries. Each kind has its advantages as well as disadvantages regarding the general well-being of its peoples and economy.
The political party model then spread over many parts of Western Europe, including France and Germany, over the 19th century. Since then, they have become the most common political system in the world. In this essay, we will show how political parties are essential to ensuring democracy. We will also show that there are unavoidable negative consequences to the party system. One of the fundamental tenants of democracy is the
Secondly, the parliamentary executives, the cabinet minister and the Prime Minister, share responsibilities. Therefore, the parliament is “jointly responsible for the actions of the government…primus inter pares (first among equals)”. (Haywood, 2007, p. 95) Lastly, a typical feature of the parliamentary system is that the offices of the Head of State and the Head of the Government remain separate from each other. Union is a key feature of the parliamentary governments worldwide.
Many people believe that the election plays the most important role in democracy. Because a free and fair election holds the government responsible and forces it to behave on voter's interest. However, some scholars find evidence that election itself is not enough to hold politicians responsible if the institutions are not shaping incentives in a correct way. In other words, the role of the election on democracy, whether it helps to serve the interest of the public or specific groups, depends on other political institutions. I