Montana Meth Project Research Paper

The fear and misconception that vaccines are harmful puts not only children at risk, but the future population as well. Many people today might think of measles as a disease of the past because it’s no longer “around”; however, this does not mean that the measles disease is gone forever. A study was done in March of 2016, to evaluate the association between vaccine refusals and the measles epidemic. Scientist evaluated eighteen published measles studies which described 1,416 measles cases and more than half, 56.8%, had no history of measles vaccination. This proves that the phenomenon of vaccine refusal was associated with an increased risk for measles among people who refuse vaccines and among fully vaccinated individuals (Phadke et al.).

This prevents egg cells from reaching the uterus. This procedure is permanent and a less violent method; however, it is expensive ($1,200 per doe). Furthermore, the Cornell University study showed that while the birth rate did decline, the overall population remained steady for over five years (Landers, Jackson). The reason that the overall deer population was remaining steady turned out to be that does were attracting other bucks from different territories into the area.

They begin to explain that the drop in crime among the age groups that would have been affected by the Roe v. Wade. They argue that because of this case those babies that would have grown and become criminals are not because they are not being born. The authors begin to support their explanation by using studies done is Australia and Canada. Both states have shown a similar causal relationship between abortion rates and crime (Levitt, Dubner 129). They further explain how the generation that was affected by Roe v. Wade is not only missing the thousands of young criminals but also the unwanted teenage mothers who would have been born if not for the Roe v.

Nearly two-thirds of all people with chlamydia or gonorrhea- the top two reported sexually transmitted diseases- go untreated because they have no symptoms, suggests a study out Wednesday. This article examines the findings of the study and warns that “left untreated, chlamydia and gonorrhea can facilitate the spread of HIV and cause pelvic inflammatory disease in women and infertility in both sexes. Most of the new gonorrhea and syphilis cases were among gay men, although rates are climbing for women. There were more cases of sexually transmitted diseases reported in the United States last year than ever before, according to new federal

Breanna Shultz Mr. Karwatsky Freshman Seminar, Per. 1 23 October 2014 The Welfare System The United States is one of the many countries that has a welfare system. This program is both beneficial and a disadvantage.

Dean-Mooney emphasizes the public agrees that “72 percent of adults think that lowering the drinking age would make alcohol more accessible to kids”(Dean-Mooney 3). Another claim of the author it that lowering the drinking age would put more responsibility on the parents and educators. Additionally, she claims that lowering the drinking age would have dangerous long- term effects. Early adolescent drinkers are, “more susceptible to alcoholism”(Dean-Mooney 10). Overall the main argument of this essay is that the drinking age should stay the same because drunk driving crashes have lowered since the 21 law was enacted and young adults brains are still developing during this

In 2017 alone, approximately 16,000 people were killed by firearms in the United States, a three percent increase from last year (Wolf). Gun control in the United States has been an issue for many years regarding the most logical way to make guns less of the threat to civilians. Many argue for a complete ban on any and all guns while many others believe in stricter regulations and background checks to ensure only those who should have a gun can get one. The issue of gun control in the United States should be addressed in a way that will actually see change as well as keep people safe. While gun control has little noticeable benefits, there are some points to mention.

When will we ever learn that bandaids don 't fix the problem? Taking away Americans guns would only decrease the rate that violence in America is increasing. A clear example of this is that most of the convicts of mass shootings have suffered from some kind of mental health disorder. In a recent study, 78% of the school shooters in America, we found to be suicidal. Only 33% of them have received a mental health evaluation, with only 15% of them receiving help

The reaction of the public was mixed to the film, considering that it was released in the 21st century. Had the film been released in the 20th century, the negative criticism would have by far, exceeded the positive criticism. The quality of writing, acting, and directing within the film was considered to be one of a high and desirable class. The main challenge that Van Sant faced was the recreation of being gay in the 1970s, and according to the critics, he totally achieved this goal. For individuals who are against homosexuality, they thought negatively about the film.

This statement seems more than likely since most countries that don’t allow private firearm possession or CCW still suffer from firearm related violent crime, while those states that allowed CCW have reported a decrease in violent crime (Kovandzic, Marvell 2003). For example, the firearm ban in the UK in 1997 resulted in an almost immediate increase of violent crime and homicide rates (Lott 2013). A couple of years later, in 2005, doctors urged the government to ban long kitchen knives since they were being used “in as many as half off all stabbings”, which simply goes to show that crime and murder is being committed despite all efforts to remove firearms from the streets. It is widely known that making something illegal doesn’t necessarily stop it, or prevent one from acquiring it, so what makes some people believe that banning guns will stop criminals from acquiring and using them? Illicit drugs, driving under the influence, rape, murder, and plenty of other crimes have been “made illegal”, however that hardly decreased the number of lives lost due to

According to John R. Lott Jr., PhD. “When states passed concealed carry laws during the 19 years we studied (from 1977 to 1995) the number of multiple- victim public shootings declined by 84%. Deaths from these shootings plummeted on average by 90% and injuries by 82%. In fact FBI crime data by economist and political commentator John R. Lott Jr, calculated that 1,570 murders, 4,177 rapes, 60,000 aggravated assaults, and 12,000 robberies could have been prevented between 1977 and 1992 if concealed carry could have been legal in every US state during that time period,”(ProCon.org). This proves that, by passing concealed carry laws, the percentage of crime has decreased ,and states have become safer due to restrictions but still allowing people to protect

While many criminal justice policies are loosely based on criminological theories if at all. The lack of consideration for criminological theories could come from the reluctance of scholars to test out the implications of theories on policy. In addition policymakers may simply be unfamiliar with crime theories and therefore have no theoretical knowledge to inform polices. Programs that lack theoretical support are more likely to fail, proving that many criminal justice policies are unlikely to be effective due to poor conceptualization. Even polices that are grounded in theory often are not well supported or are difficult to implement.

In addition, Mahesh Vidual, explains that in 1987 at Colorado School it was said that “unvaccinated children infected 11% of vaccinated students.” (Individual Rights vs. Public Health: The Vaccination Debate. Paragraph: 6.) Basically, Vidual is saying that the population needs to vaccinate to stop the diseases from growing. Looking back at history, it is said that if Americans get a vaccination, they do not only avoid getting the disease themselves but might also spread it to others.

“In the 20 years that Oregon’s Death with Dignity Law has been on the books, 1,749 patients have been prescribed lethal medications, and only 64% of them (1,127) used them to die, according to state data. Last year, Oregon doctors prescribed 206 lethal medications, 133 of which were reported used by patients” (Portland Press Herald). This statistic shows that not all patients who are prescribed the drugs, use them to end their life. Gale states, “The three most frequently cites reasons for requesting suicide were: a decreasing ability to participate in activities that made life enjoyable, loss of autonomy and loss of dignity.

Medications need to be monitored and used correctly to ensure the health of the individual. If a person is on the verge of depression because of their anxiety, their best hope is a prescription drug. If the drug is abused the outcome would be what they originally had felt, most common depression. Suicidal thoughts would begin to take place, all because the medication had not been effective as the user didn’t affectively take the drug as ordered. If a death was to occur the medication would most likely not be to blame but the way the user had been taking the medication and not communication with their