In the state of Montana (MT) it is estimated that wetlands make up less than one percent of the entire landscape (DEQ, 2013), which only signifies their importance to the ecological health of the state and its waters. Montana’s wetlands and riparian areas are a priceless resource that provide a variety of ecosystem functions. These function include, clean water, fish and wildlife habitats, flood reduction, flow regulation, nutrient and pollution removal, and so much more. These resources add immense value to those who are lucky enough to call MT home. They are also critical for the water quality and quantity they provide to Montanans and their economy. Unfortunately, the wetland and riparian resources of MT have been negatively affected …show more content…
This limited understanding by watershed groups, local governments, landowners, and others leads to a concentrated focus on rivers and streams water quality, and not on the associated wetlands, which are a vital part of a functioning watershed (DEG, 2013). According to the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) (2013), the absence of wetland programs at the state level contributes to indirect impacts to wetlands that greatly affect the health of a watershed. To address this issue, and to restore, sustain, and protect MT’s remaining wetlands, the Montana Wetland Council (MWC), led by DEQ, has developed statewide framework, Priceless Resources: A Strategic Framework for Wetland and Riparian Area Conservation and Restoration in Montana 2013–2017. This framework, which builds on the prior framework, Priceless Resources: Strategic Framework for Wetland and Riparian Area Conservation and Restoration in Montana 2008–2012, provides a focused approach to protecting MT’s wetland …show more content…
With a riparian goal to protect, maintain, and restore the ecological integrity of riparian areas (MWC, 2008 & 2013). In order to attain these goals, MWC (2013) developed seven strategic directions: 1). Restoration, protection, and management through support and participation of on the ground projects and practices with the intended outcome of MT’s land and resource managers have ample human and financial support to supportively restore, conserve, protect, and increase its wetlands, riparian areas, streams, and associated uplands; 2) Support the completion, maintenance, and dissemination of statewide digital wetland and riparian mapping information with proper training for all entities with the intended outcome that maps are used as a critical tool; 3) Monitoring and assessment by encouraging data collection, integration to inform local planning, protection, restoration, and landscape level decision making with the desired outcome that decision makers, resource managers, and the public can rely on the monitoring information as accurate and sound science-based information; 4) Support local, state, tribal, and federal governments with planning and policy with the intended goal these governments are well equipped with the
Thus, the Supreme Court recently noted, the jurisdictional “reach of the [CWA] is notoriously unclear.” Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, 132 S.Ct. 1367, 1375 (2012) (observing that “[a]ny piece of land that is wet at least part of the year is in danger of being classified…as wetlands covered by the Act…”). As the Corps continuously expands definition of “waters of the United States,” and so does it expand its jurisdictional
Initial federal permits, and partnership with affected tribes, were treated as a “check the box” exercise. Nowhere was there a careful analysis of how much the Missouri River crossing threatened water quality and tribal treaty rights. Nowhere was there a thoughtful public discussion of whether a new major oil pipeline should be placed in a river providing drinking water to 17 million people. And one had to pore over hundreds of pages of technical data to learn that the original route of the pipeline crossed the river just north of Bismarck, N.D. — a capital city that is nearly 90 percent white — and was moved to Standing Rock only when regulators expressed concern over the risk of a spill to the city’s water
“ In the 20 years since water from the Colorado River was first applied to lands in the Wellton - Mohawk area, reclamation of irrigable lands has resulted in high crop yields and correspondingly high annual agricultural income.” The income from the crops was found to be $37 million which was more than one half, 66 million dollars which was invested by the U.S “, Wellton- Mohawk and Drainage district to the project, which comes off negatively because their profit was not good. The data recorded here was based off of the year 1974 and its crops and money made. “ The impact on population in Yuma County would be quite noticeable upon complete
Through funding received from membership fees and donations, Sierra Club has become a paramount player in the modern Conservation kineticism. Individuals and organizations across America limpidly understand that contributions to the Sierra Club will be well utilized in
There are factories located relatively close to the wetland, which release gases and smoke affecting the biophysical processes in the
8. Lake of the Ozarks The Lake of the Ozarks is a reservoir in central Missouri with a surface area of 54,000 acres and 1,150 miles of shoreline. The lake 's serpentine form inspired its nickname "The Magic Dragon". Bass Master tournaments and PGA Club Pro Championships have been held here. The lake is 92 miles long and was created when the 2,543-foot Bagnell Dam to provide hydroelectric power, stopping the flow of the Osage River.
One of my peers read this quote from the article “Landowners own the resource and have the right to pump water from beneath their land, as long as the water is being put to beneficial use,” and was confused at this because he had never heard of landowners being able to pump water on their land and that there was even a law for that. By examining this quote we learned something new instead of just reading it and continuing on. When I was reading this article I found this quote “In a drought, as the rivers run low, less fresh water reaches the ocean, causing an imbalance of salt water to fresh water in coastal estuaries,” and interpreted this fact that when that imbalance occurs it can have some damages to the ecosystem affecting the local vegetation and wildlife. The fisherman and farmers living near the water are also affected by this imbalance causing harm to their crops and animals. The other person I talked to had a personal experience with one of the quotes, “These farmers braved the elements; they were confronted with Mother Nature.”
Runoff in streams and rivers is a massive problem in the Southeastern United States, along with other parts of the world. While each area has different elevations, soil types, and vegetation, it shows that it is a constant problem that all areas show. The definition of runoff can be complicated or simple, depending on the person who explains it. The effects of runoff, seen throughout the different areas, can affect the ecosystem. The ecosystem can be affected by the leading cause of runoff, erosion.
“...50% of the original wetlands of South Florida no longer exist today.” The Everglades has a big effect with the water supply. The Everglades has been having many issues with the water supply. Containing,the history of the Everglades, the problems with the water supply today, and the issues on the recent attempts to improve the water supply in the Everglades National Park. There must be a way to fix all these problems.
The Florida Everglades is the third-largest national park out of the 48 states. It is also the first national park created to protect the fragile ecosystem. Without the protection of the alliga-tors and thus the ecosystem area we know as the everglades could eventually become nonexist-ent. At one time “this wetland was called the river of grass by an author back in 1947” (Strawn 17).
Due to the major loss of land Louisiana’s land many animal populations have decreased dramatically and are either endangered or exist. The land loss has lead to other major problems such as easier chances of being hit by natural disasters like hurricanes. Approximately half the nation’s original wetland habitats have been lost over
States can be heavily impacted by all of this wetland destruction. For example, Louisiana, approximately 40 percent of the country’s total wetlands area are located in Louisiana. It sates in the passage “Wetlands and Habitat Loss” that Louisiana is located at the drainage gateway where the Mississippi River meets the Gulf of Mexico. This is why Louisiana holds such a great percentage of the United States Everglades. If you take away wetlands in states like Louisiana, then there would no longer be anywhere for natural habitats to inhabit creatures that need that type of environment to survive.
Without the flow of fresh water to the Everglades fish wouldn 't be able to live, the Florida Bay wouldn’t be able to survive and we wouldn’t have clean water to drink. On page 113 paragraph 1 it states “ These wetlands were once home to many rare, endangered, and exotic species. However, this is no longer the case due to
Subject- Deforestation affects majority of the population, including people and animals, across the nation and in my community. Situation or Problem- Deforestation is the action of eliminating trees, in forests, by cutting them down. The objective of deforestation is to create more land for construction and land establishments with the idea of not restoring thee trees back or replacing them. How it affects my community- Deforestation can disrupt the homes of many animals, including birds and fish.
“The Sacred Headwaters is a subalpine basin in northern British Columbia, Canada” (Wikipedia). The Sacred Headwater is ecologically important for several reasons. To begin with, the region has three wild salmon rivers. It also contains many other wild species such as grizzly bears and stone sheep (Wikipedia). More importantly, “The Sacred Headwaters is rich in mineral and energy resources, particularly coal and coalbed methane”(Wikipedia).