In the documentary “Moonshots for the 21st Century” by Fareed Zakaria, he describes “5 moonshots” which all have a promising future to potentially positively impact our economy, political and social norms. The “Moonshot” title refers to the statement by then US President John F. Kennedy in 1962: “…. we choose to go to the moon …by the end of this decade” (Rice University speech, September 12, 1962). This speech by an American president indicated a national resolve to reach a difficult and shared goal. And that goal was reached in 1969 – before the end of the decade as JFK promised. It wasn’t easy and it wasn’t cheap, but it was a success and in many ways we are still reaping the benefits of the scientific and engineering breakthroughs it …show more content…
It will be an enormous energy resource powered by virtually inexhaustible hydrogen from ocean water. I think this is the most promising for the future because eventually, we are going to run out of resources on earth and we need to begin now to figure out an alternate source before we have none left. There are many social, economic and political gains and consequences on the line here. The cost will be astronomical, which is why sharing that cost among the nations of the world is essential. No one country could carry it alone. There are huge forces involved in controlled fusion, and there is certainly a danger of a mishap, however, unlike the fission reactions that power today’s nuclear power plants, there is very little radioactivity or danger of meltdown involved. But I thing the biggest “danger” involved is due to the need for close international cooperation. Any project like this requires extremely tight coordination of efforts. Each nation must do its part exactly per the overall plan Political rivalries and struggles to “control” the effort could easily result in a breakdown of the management structure of the project. If this goes wrong, many countries will have lost billions of dollars. Another reason why this is risky is because every move the project makes requires talk to the committee of a representative from every country involved to agree on a next
Now that the Space Race is over, what is the point? Are we wasting our money? Should we cut their budget? When the cold war ended with the soviets in 1991, it sparked up a debate as to whether or not the funding for the National Aeronautics and space administration should be continued. Although it may seem like a simple fix, it has proved to be one of NASA’s greatest and most difficult challenges yet.
Now that the Space Race is over, what is the point? Are we wasting our money? Should we cut their budget? When the cold war ended with the soviets in 1991, it sparked up a debate as to whether or not the funding for the National Aeronautics and space administration should be continued. Although it may seem like a simple fix, it has proved to be one of NASA’s greatest and most difficult challenges yet.
The general impact of the address "The choice to go to the hand" of John F. Kennedy 's motivating. His discourse has been composed and said to illuminate Americans in regards to the thought and mission of the space program and the Assembled States government. The American individuals have thoughts and are happy to wind up plainly the first to put man on the moon. The thought and the mission specified in this discourse have been completed and is exceptionally viable, in light of the fact that we, the US, won the "Race Space" and we prevail in the goals of our as a country. Individuals even today are exceptionally roused by this discourse and it will perpetually leave its blemish on our nation and in our
During this time period was the cold war. The United States was competing with the Soviet Union for technological dominance. We were in a race to reach the moon, but, in reality, weren’t ready yet. If we could realistically film a moon landing, we would still win. John F. Kennedy, the president at the time, was desperate to beat the Soviet Union and promised to put a man on the moon by 1972.
Hogan 's notes it is stated clearly that we can control fission bombs which is where you have an element and brealit apart, but fusion bombs where we have a small element and we make it bigger we cannot control. This shows that scientists are messing with things that are uncontrollable which can lead to dangerous outcomes and mankind is unaware of the drastic damages we can do to our world. According to the website “How Stuff Works” it states that “Fusion bombs are also dangerous because they are 700 times more powerful than the little boy bomb which is a fission bomb.” This is another reason the H bomb should be banned since government officials have these weapons and the use of them it is highly dangerous. This amount of power should not be able to be used by anyone since its ending outcome, but not intended outcome is the slow extinction of mankind.
Through this demonstration more than five billion dollars was put into training relating to Science and the humanities, encouraging the Americans yearning to win the Space Race. (John F. Kennedy *6) This created intensified the tensions between the Soviets and the U.S. because it left both nations competing to have the upper hand in nuclear weaponry technology
Kayla Bell Ms. Dillard H Lit Comp 9 15 September 2015 Title John F. Kennedy speech, in his “We choose to go to the moon”, discusses his view and support on the effort to land a man on the Moon and return him safely to the Earth. Kennedy’s purpose is to be able to send a man to the moon and back without any harm done to him. He adopts a motivational and passionate tone in order to persuade people to support his idea. Kennedy begins his address speaking about how far we have come and how fast we have come in recorded history.
Nuclear fusion technology produces astronomical amounts of energy at once, and so far it has not been able to control or store nuclear fusion plasma. In other words, it is a waste of time because you can not store much energy when you make it. And the current technology may not be able to make a workable nuclear fusion reactor yet. Because the approach to fusion is not going to fail to find a miracle breakthrough, it 's not the time we need to get there, but it 's the time we need to invest billions more, if not billions, of dollars in something that 's
The current budget is a ninth of what it was in its heyday of the 60’s, yet missions continue to grow bolder[2]. NASA was born in the midsts of the Cold
The choice made by John F. Kennedy to place a man on the moon opened an endless realm of possibilities for space exploration, while simultaneously uniting and boosting the morale of the American people together. After the long-lasting fight of World War II, the only two great powers that were left in the world were the United States and the Soviet Union. Both countries differed in many ways. For example, they were dissimilar economically, politically, and culturally. When the war ended, tension rose
It wasn’t just about funding though, it was also about getting to the moon and placing a man there, getting past the boundaries and having further in-depth knowledge of our solar system. Kennedy’s
The Space Race, the geopolitical and astronomical contest between the Cold War rivals of USA and the USSR signified the period of meteoric rise to the pinnacle of human advancement, innovation and exploration. The influential impacts and importance of the Space Race transcended the world’s perspective towards the immeasurable potential of human accomplishment and the exponential capacity of human audacity. Moreover, the Space Race vindicated and perpetuated the power of hope, optimism and our willingness to dream the impossible. Through the Space Race, the world witnessed remarkable advancements by the two nations and their unrelenting pursuit for scientific, economical and political recognition. From the first successful launch and elliptical
After witnessing the decline of new innovations by the world’s space programs since the ‘60s, he
President Kennedy’s moon speech at Rice University came at a time of high uncertainty regarding technology and the threat of war. Kennedy’s emotive speech aimed to lift and inspire those who feared the worst and to encourage the population to grow and achieve their greatest potential. The ‘moon speech’ will be analysed by uncovering key components of the speech that created a lasting impression on the authors of this report. It is important to firstly explore and identify the traits and attributes of leadership exhibited by President Kennedy in this speech. Additionally, a discussion amongst group members will be necessary to ascertain how and why this speech was inspiring, and whether this speech could be considered as the greatest speech
When Neil Armstrong first touched down on the moon in 1969, millions of people watched him take the first step and create history (Villard). Yet even as we’ve moved on from the moon landings and consider them as a pivotal point for mankind, “Forty years after U.S. astronaut Neil Armstrong became the first human to set foot on the moon, many conspiracy theorists still insist the Apollo 11 moon landing was an elaborate hoax”(Than). The idea that our voyage to the moon was deliberately staged seems to resurface year after year. While the conspiracy theorists claim the moon landing was a hoax, creating a fake moon landing would have been more expensive and difficult than actually reaching the moon. The race to the moon began on October 5, 1957, when the Soviet Union launched Sputnik into orbit around the earth: “When the Soviet Union launched the satellite Sputnik, on October 4, 1957, the United States experienced a technological identity crisis”(Olson).