Moore's Paradox Analysis
Jordi Fernandez, Transparent Minds, Chapter 4: Moore’s Paradox Moore’s paradox is a puzzle that concerns the following sentences: (1): NB — It is raining and I do not believe it is raining (omissive) (2): BN — It is raining and I believe it is not raining (commissive) To have the intuition that either is true is irrational. But, neither of these sentences are logical contradictions. The beliefs could be correct, even though they seem to us as being irrational. — Deflationism One strategy for solving Moore’s paradox is deflationism, which is to raise the truth-conditions of NB and BN to the same level. This is surprising because the truth-condition of NB concerns the world, while the truth-condition of BN concerns the mind. There are two main methods for doing so: i) bottom-up, or raising the level of the first conjunct to that of the second, or ii) top-down, bringing the second conjunct down to the level of the first. — A Top-Down Strategy The broad deflationist view suggests that when “I believe that P” is asserting, one asserts “that P”. There may be two versions of this: i) weak deflationism — by uttering “I believe that P”, one asserts both “I believe that P” and “P”, and …show more content…
And the same can be said of desires. Our grounds for having beliefs and desires are the same states as our bases for self-attributing those beliefs and desires. Fernandez suggests merely that we should not believe a proposition if we have no grounds for believing it. Furthermore, we should not believe a proposition is we have grounds for believing the proposition is not the case. A subject’s grounds for believing a particular belief is her total, weighted set of grounds for that belief. And so, for any proposition, S should not believe P if, all things considered, S has grounds for not believing that P. Moore’s paradox violates these restrictions on what we may
Del Tackett's Insanity
221 Words | 1 PagesOn the first DVD of “The Truth Project” small group study, Del Tackett considers the subject of truth. He defines “truth” as conformity to fact or reality. In that study, Del tells us that we all suffer from common insanity. “Sanity” is being in touch with reality. “Insanity” is losing touch with reality.
The Other Wes Moore Analysis
1448 Words | 6 PagesSummary: The Other Wes Moore: One Name, Two Fates by Wes Moore explores the journey of two men by the same name who grow up in similar neighborhoods, but end up with different endings. The book shares the stories of both men who highlight significant events in their life that led one to be a businessman, while the other a convict in prison for murder without the possibility of parole. When Moore discovers Wes’s story he begins to correspond with him and it is their correspondence that inspired this book. First of all, Part One explains the childhood of the two boys and how both had an absent father. However, Wes loses his father because of a virus that goes undetected by doctors, while the other does not have a father because he chose to leave his child.
Edmund Gettier's Justified True Belief Theory
804 Words | 4 PagesAlso known as counterfactual conditions, the two conditions are ----. If I then apply Nozick’s theory to the previously mentioned Gettier-style case of the barn country, the proposition ‘the man is looking a real barn’ can be further analyzed: The man knows that he is looking at a real barn iff: i) He is in fact looking at a real barn, ii) He is justified in believing that it is a real barn,
Edmund Gettier's Article: Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?
1261 Words | 6 PagesIn the 1963 philosophy paper titled “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”, Edmund Gettier attempts to deconstruct and disprove the philosophical argument that justified true belief is knowledge. Justified true belief, also commonly referred to as JTB, is used as a certain set of conditions that are used to explain someone s knowing some sort of proposition p. More specifically, JTB is used to say that s has knowledge of p if and only if p is true, s believes that p is true, and s is justified in believing that p is true. Gettier offers main points as the conclusion of his argument against this claim. First, he states that s can be justified in believing that p is true while p is actually false.
Moore's Argument For The Existence Of God
179 Words | 1 PagesTherefore he is assuming the conclusion of the argument, that there is an external world, or, in other words, that objects (hands) exist external to his mind. Now, suppose latter is the issue. In that case, Moore is saying ‘I know that this is a hand,’ and concluding ‘therefore, I know that an external world exists.’ In this case, too, Moore is assuming that the
Review Of Edmund Gettier's Undefeated Justified True Belief
925 Words | 4 PagesFirst, Gettier Edmund Gettier is an American philosopher who’s well known for his work in the field of epistemology. Gettier is one of the first to challenge the tripartite structure of ‘justified-true-belief’, arguing there are instances in which an individual could have a true belief, this true belief is justified, and given all that, the individual still fails to acquire any knowledge. We’ve all heard the phrase, “Even a broken clock is right twice a day.” Now, imagine by sheer coincidence you look at a broken clock, which happens to read the correct time; this is a simple, yet valid example of where the ‘JTB’ method goes awry. In other words, the time displayed is true and you’re justified in your belief that the time displayed is correct, and yet, you lack knowledge of the time.
Edmund Gettier's Essay: Is Justified True Knowledge?
1120 Words | 5 PagesThe streets are wet, there are puddles on the sidewalks, water is pouring down from the sky, and everybody is wearing their raincoats, so I am justified in believing that it is raining outside. Edmund Gettier argues that the three conditions listed above are not sufficient to constitute knowledge. Many people are on his side. They argue that you do not need any kind of mental state in order for it to be knowledge. Others defend their doubt of the justified true belief theory by stating how certain animals know how to do things even if they do not believe anything.
Essay On Goldman's Causal Theory Of Knowledge
1367 Words | 6 PagesFor P to believe x there needs to be a causal connection for P's believing x. Goldman
Gettier's Argument Is Virtue
771 Words | 4 PagesAn example using this proposition is that Smith cannot know that he got the job just because he has the coins in his pocket. Other applicants could have had ten coins in their pockets as well. Therefore, Smith does not have the apparent knowledge that he knows he will be hired because he wasn’t told he was hired, but he’s just lucky to have been hired and it wasn’t based off of knowledge. Ichikawa and Steup counter Gettiers original conditions by countering to show that (iv) does not succeed in being a solution to Gettiers problem. One of their counter-examples if a god that say S is observing.
Arguments Against Reformed Epistemology
882 Words | 4 PagesHe continue and states, “It is tempting to raise the following sort of question. If belief in God can be properly basic, why cannot just any belief be properly
Quine's Holism
1507 Words | 7 PagesThus, for Quine’s version of Holism to be true, all beliefs must be revisable. Analytic knowledge is non-revisable. Therefore, if Quine’s Holism is true, no statement is analytic. In this paper, I will consider, and then reject, a version of Holism that allows for non-revisable analytic statements. I will then argue that any reasonable
Against Instance Confirmation Analysis
852 Words | 4 PagesE2: philosopher 3 is wearing philosopher 2’s hat. It can be established that E1 and E2 both are instances of hypothesis H as these are of type Pa ∧ Ra. Hence ,following the method of Instances Confirmation , we can see that E1 confirms H as well as E2 confirms H. But in our discussion we have ignored the following fact that by above two observations( made by the philosopher 1) we logically formulate that he is wearing his own hat. Thus, our hypothesis seems to be false .Hence confirmation of hypothesis by both E1 and E2 seems to be paradoxical as in reality the hypothesis H is false. Attempted Solution to paradox;**
Philosophical Scepticism Analysis
1011 Words | 5 Pagesand hence, that he has proved (5) ‘There is an external world.’ Stroud want to explains this contradiction by differentiating between two ideas of the question concerning our knowledge, and two reactions which are an internal reaction and an external reaction. For the internal reaction, we answer the question "do you know p?" by establishing
Festinger's Dissonance Theory Essay
1132 Words | 5 PagesSeveral psychological and cognitive insights have been given a to why CB occurs. A fairly prevalent explanation, as described by Kosnik (2007) is that humans have restricted cognitive abilities particularly when it comes to information processing. According to Rabin and Schrag (1999), CB means people can interpret evidence to support their belief in whatever so phenomenon. Other explanations include people’s desire to feel confident in their decisions. An experiment by Eliaz and Schotter (2010) showed people were willing to pay for information about a decision they were planning to make, despite knowing this information would not affect the decision.
More about Moore's Paradox Analysis
Del Tackett's Insanity
221 Words | 1 PagesThe Other Wes Moore Analysis
1448 Words | 6 PagesEdmund Gettier's Justified True Belief Theory
804 Words | 4 PagesEdmund Gettier's Article: Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?
1261 Words | 6 PagesMoore's Argument For The Existence Of God
179 Words | 1 PagesReview Of Edmund Gettier's Undefeated Justified True Belief
925 Words | 4 PagesEdmund Gettier's Essay: Is Justified True Knowledge?
1120 Words | 5 PagesEssay On Goldman's Causal Theory Of Knowledge
1367 Words | 6 PagesGettier's Argument Is Virtue
771 Words | 4 PagesArguments Against Reformed Epistemology
882 Words | 4 PagesQuine's Holism
1507 Words | 7 PagesSocrates Virtue
468 Words | 2 PagesAgainst Instance Confirmation Analysis
852 Words | 4 PagesPhilosophical Scepticism Analysis
1011 Words | 5 PagesFestinger's Dissonance Theory Essay
1132 Words | 5 Pages