What would you do if tomorrow never arrives? In the movie Groundhog Day, weatherman Phil Connors faced question. He was forced to relive the same day over and over again, and he needed to decide on what to do with this repeating day. If there is no tomorrow, it is true that “we could do whatever we wanted” since “there would be no consequences”, as claimed by the two drunken men in the movie. However, we should also ask ourselves what should be the right things to do. In Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, philosopher Immanuel Kant discussed this question by explaining the aspects that contributes to a moral action. Based on the implications of what contributes to a moral action through the movie and Kant’s work, I formed my view that …show more content…
One’s action are moral if they accord the idea of categorical imperative. Categorical Imperative focuses on “the form and principle” of an action, not “what is to result” from it (Kant 20). To clarify, and action’s morality is based on why one did it, not its consequences since one has no control over it. In the movie Phil tried to help an old man every day, but the old man still died when the day ends (Groundhog Day). Despite the unpleasant result, Phil acted ethically because for Kant, he acted with good intentions. He wanted to help people regardless of the result. For me, I would always consider doing whatever that gives good consequences, such as cheering up my friend. However, if it is for bad intentions, like I cheer up my friend to let them do things in my favor, it is immoral. On the other hand, if I do something for the right reasons, such as I tried to helped my friend to fix the car because I wanted to help, but the problem was not resolved at the end, my action would still be moral because although the result is bad, it started with a good reason. It is important for one to act with good intentions since one may “lives according to duty, but not from duty” because one might be acting for “a selfish purpose” (Kant 8). In other words, one’s actions may seem moral because they seem to follow one’s duty, but in reality it is not since it is for self-interests. For instance, if I know that I can escape the time loop by helping others, I would help people like how Phil helps the town people, but for the purpose of breaking the time loop, hence my actions are immoral, seeing that I am just trying to fulfill my self-interest. On the whole, I should always act with a right reason when being forced to relive the same day, because they are what determines the morality of my
He also stresses that we should do everything in our power to prevent bad things from happening whether it is to other or to situations like fixing a town people once lived in. With that being said he knew that not everyone would be as helpful as others and that they would use the excuse of not being able to give as much as that other person, and if that person is not helping then why should they. He then came up with a conclusion of giving just enough to prevent more suffering.
Is doing the right thing really as important as everyone says it is? Billy Budd takes place on a ship during wartime. The main character, Billy Budd was known as being a peacemaker and a great man. He stuttered and had trouble expressing his emotions, but he was always positive. The crew loved Billy but he would always get in trouble for the smallest things because Claggart, the Master of Arms, hated him.
In today's society, people try everything to do what is right, but although they do their best to be moral, they may still
This quote relates to morality because it portrays how society was like several years ago. Morality is the ability to decipher what’s right and wrong to establish the truth. For instance, racism took a huge part in the county as many white citizens bestride over the negroes to show power. During the case with Tom Robinson, Atticus was able to provide substantial evidence to prove that Tom Robinson was not guilty regardless of what the other witnesses had said. However, since the jury consisted primarily of white race, the final verdict was announced as guilty.
Secondly, the author claims that a common thread of values is identifiable in every culture. Like how the law of gravity tell us about behavior of physical objects, the author contrasts the moral law with the natural law which tells us how to behave (C.S. Lewis, 1952, p. 17). Lewis states that moral law exists and is independent. The moral law presses upon us to do the decent thing, even if it causes us discomfort. The natural law directs the objects that exists whereas the moral law controls on how we behave towards others, how we live our lives and so on (C.S. Lewis, 1952, p. 20).
What defines an action to be moral or political? A moral action is an action that is aimed towards doing good, and does not violate anybody’s rights. Moral actions can also be referred to as ethos. A political action is an action aimed towards gaining or retaining power, which can also be referred to as kratos. In the epic poem The Odyssey by Homer, the main protagonist, Odysseus, makes many decisions that reflect upon his character.
In every day life, we face many situations that require a moral decision. We have to decide what is right and what is wrong? Not always is this an easy task thus, it seems important to analyze how we make our moral decisions. I will start with an analysis of how we make decisions in general
In other words, if a person acts only out of duty and not self-interest, their action is morally justifiable regardless of what the consequence may be. As you can see, this belief is different from the utilitarian who mainly focuses on the end result of an act or the consequences of the
This constitutes the idea of consequentialism, in which “certain normative properties depend only on consequences.” To be moral in this sense is to engage in activities that bring about the best consequences. John Stuart Mill, being a utilitarianist, contends that the aim of all human activity is happiness and “that pleasure, and freedom from pain, are the only things desirable as ends [the consequence]” (Mill, 1861, p.343). With regards to Phil Connors at the early stages of the film, however, is not a utilitarianist, as he puts his own happiness first, and his own self interests matter more than those of others.
Thesis Statement: Origin of Morality Outline A.Universal Ethics 1.Karl Barth, The Command of God 2.Thomas Aquinas, The Natural Law 3.Thomas Hobbes, Natural Law and Natural Right 4.Immanuel Kant, The Categorical Imperative B.Morality and Practical Reason 1.Practical Reason a.Practical Reason and Practical Reasons C.Evolution of Morality 1.What makes Moral Creatures Moral 2.Explaining the Nature of Moral Judgments F. Answering Questions 1. What is the origin of Morality: Religion or Philosophy? 2. What does religion say about morality?
The two moral reasonings are consequentialist and categorical. Consequentialist means the consequences that will result after whatever you do, whether it is the right or wrong thing to do. Categorical moral reasoning locates morality in certain duties and rights. Somethings are just morally wrong even if it brings good outcomes. According to Mill the principle of utility means realizing a consequence of something before you do it,whether your intentions are good or bad.
Throughout history many great philosophers have attempted to unravel the origins of virtues by developing moral theories of their own. This document is designed to provide the reader with an overview of some of the more popular theories concerning morals. Three of the most popular moral theories are… Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism. Though Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism differ in many ways, they also share similar fundamentals. Utilitarianism is a highly acclaimed theory that is morally based on consequentialism.
Ethics and the search for a good moral foundation first drew me into the world of philosophy. It is agreed that the two most important Ethical views are from the world’s two most renowned ethical philosophers Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. In this paper, I will explore be analyzing Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle and Kant’s Categorical Imperative. In particular, I want to discuss which principle provides a better guideline for making moral decisions. And which for practical purposes ought to be taught to individuals.
Paper I – Spring ‘16 What has to be true about our actions for them to be right or wrong? Respond with reference to Kant and Bentham In an episode of the popular 90’s TV-series Friends named “The One Where Phoebe Hates PBS”, the characters Phoebe and Joey engage in a debate over the existence of self-less acts of kindness. Referencing the philosopher Immanuel Kant’s moral theory, Joey, claims that there is no such thing as a “selfless good deed” (“The One Where Phoebe Hates PBS”). Phoebe now sets out to disprove this theory and comes back having allowed a bee to sting her so “he could look cool in front of his friends” (“The One Where Phoebe Hates PBS”).
Moral philosophers say that the main contribution of Hutcheson to the concept of moral sense is that he describes the working of moral sense. The process, Hutcheson described,