Even though this is an entirely internal matter, the United States has a moral obligation to invade Cartesia. The moral obligation of the US is to extinguish the brutal genocidal civil war raging between dueling ethnic groups. Over the past ten years in Cartesia, a brutal genocidal civil war has raged between rival ethnic groups. Tens of thousands of civilians have been massacred. Therefore, it is desirable and just that some party intervene and stop the injustices. While war is without a doubt an evil, it is necessary in certain contexts. Deane, (1963) writes, “War is always an evil, though on occasions it may be necessary in order to prevent worse evils” (156) Taking Deane’s summary of St. Augustine to heart, we have a moral obligation to …show more content…
Essentially for something of this gravity to occur something has to go really poorly. This thing is reason. Reason becomes corrupted. Both Dr. Crockett and St. Thomas Aquinas provide some guidance on how this occurs. They both point to the corruption of reason. In the view of both Dr. Crockett and St. Thomas Aquinas, Cartesia descended into a vicious genocide and civil war due to corruption of reason. In articles five and six of Aquinas’ question 94, Thomas lays out the possible manners by which this can occur. Aquinas, “Some men have a reason that has been distorted by passion, or by evil habits, or by bad natural relations.” (50). He then provides historical examples such as the ancient Germans, who apparently had a problem with stealing things. Perhaps foreshadowing what was to come in the twentieth century. A modern example of the corruption of reason would be the 9/11 hijackers flying planes into the World Trade Centers. Their reason was perverted. In what manner their reason was corrupted is up for debate. But, there is no doubt that their reason was perverted. According to Dr. Crockett, we can deduce different manners by which reason can become corrupted. There exist three ways by which individual reason can be corrupted and two ways by which societal reason can be perverted. The three individual reasons are by passion, evil …show more content…
In his writings, St. Augustine touches on the idea of how we should treat those who are “merely following orders”. St. Augustine sides with those who claim that they are merely following orders. Deane (1963), writes, “The soldier must simply obey his leader. He is not guilty of wrongdoing if he fights in obedience to the commands of his rulers, even if it is clear that the monarch has acted unjustly” In the hypothetical of St. Augustine sitting on the Nuremberg Court situation, St. Augustine would side with those who were just following orders. Therefore, according to St. Augustine, the former oppressors are innocent so long as they were following
When you work in the Army, you do not have much of a choice when you are given an order, which makes it hard to define what actions from troops in the Army are the result of just following orders and what actions are ultimately their willful decision. In the book Gentlehands by M.E. Kerr, we can judge whether we believe Frank Trenker, also known as Gentlehands, should face justice for his actions as an SS Nazi soldier or if he should be left alone in peace. Mr. Trenker, like almost all Nazi soldiers at the time, killed millions of innocent people. He also lied on a legal document upon entrance to America. What sets his case apart is that he committed acts that were beyond his orders, such as tormenting his prisoners.
Warped War Logic War, what is it good for? Edwin Starr asked this very good question in his famous song. War is violent, gruesome, and deadly, so why is it used to solve problems? Innocent people go fight in wars to try and win other people’s battles. When really thought about, the reasons people go to war do not make sense.
War may bring freedom and prosperity, but not without the cost of killing the innocent and bringing misery and sorrow into the
Out with the violence, in with the peace! In E.B. Sledge’s book “With the Old Breed” he discusses his war experiences and opinions on the matter. In the introduction of the book, war is described as “brutish, inglorious, and a terrible waster.” I second that.
Reason is how one's mind is able to logically think, understand, and form judgements (1). When it comes to the Ted Talk video, “Archeology from space” many examples of reason can be seen. One major example is shown at
In the right context, war can be justified. It consists of people voluntarily fighting for a cause they have deemed fit. They are willing to make the sacrifice. What crosses the line is when innocent people are hurt and have no way to escape. They will be thrown around until the conflict is over.
The relationship between the reason and religious beliefs has been highlighted by the three parts mentioned According to Pojman an argument for an ethical duty to strictly believe in accord with the evidence available that supports it (170). I concur that a person’s beliefs can affect the well-being of others, it is best to be open- minded towards criticism (167). According to Pojman, one can hold positions that faith and reason are compatible, that it is rational to belief in God (166). And lastly that faith can be opposed to reason and therefore faith is the questionable area of rationality (166).
War is something that, at this point in history, can be arguably deemed as part of the human condition. For whatever reason, it appears that humans are destined not to get along and that violent conflict is the preferred method of solving issues that arise. Whether it be fighting for the love of Helen of Troy or espousing the likes of God and Allah as a justification, war is one thing that time has yet to see the end of. That being said, it comes as no surprise that academics, scientists, and philosophers alike have taken to attempting to understand why wars happen. A controversial and somewhat debated topic is the concept of the Just War Principles.
“People need to believe in a just world in which everyone gets what they deserve and deserves what they get…it is what helps people feel that their world has order” (Kim, Nagata, Akiyama 346). The belief in a just world is one that is universally understood, and is a belief that has been carried out throughout time and space. The advancement of good and the abolishment of evil is what will keep humanity morally right. “He beareth not the sword in vain: for he is God's minister, an avenger to execute wrath upon him that doth evil"; so too, it is their business to have recourse to the sword of war in defending the common weal against external enemies. Hence it is said to those who are in authority (Ps. 81:4): "Rescue the poor: and deliver the needy out of the hand of the sinner" (St. Aquinas
It makes sense for people to detest war but what does not make sense is for people to love war and encourage it. "If what Billy Pilgrim learned from the Tralfamadorians is true, that we will all live forever, no matter how dead we may sometimes seem to be, I am not overjoyed. Still--if I am going to spend eternity visiting this moment and that, I'm grateful that so many of those moments are nice." 1.
The Limits of Reason Over time people have evolved to use reason and logical explanations to solve problems rather than spiritual beliefs. Before humans began relying on rational thought, they based their actions off of the belief of gods and fate. An example of someone relying solely on reason in the age of gods and goddesses is The Fox in Till We Have Faces: A Myth Retold. This character, The Fox, in Till We Have Faces: A Myth Retold by C. S. Lewis relies on reason to solve complicated situations which may limit him mentally from other possible solutions and may also be evident in today’s culture.
Introduction The Life of St. Antony by Athanasius was a very important book to the Christian Byzantines and was continuously read throughout the early Christian world. It was a biography that was also held up as a model of the ideal life in the Byzantine civilization. The author himself, St. Athanasius, was a man that would have preferred the monastic lifestyle, but was an important and influential man in the church and therefore, contrary to his wishes, had to live among the people. This colours his perspective and most likely makes him somewhat biased in the way that he describes St. Antony.
Out of this tension and search for answers in Christian thought, emerged the Just War Theory of St. Augustine of Hippo. Augustine continued in the Christian tradition of believing all war to be intrinsically evil. He unequivocally condemned those who desired, sought, or enjoyed war, and made it clear that to engage in a just war is to engage in war by force of necessity. In Book 4, chapter 14 of his magnum opus, The City of God, he says “to carry on war and extend a kingdom over wholly subdued nations seems to bad men to be felicity, to good men necessity .”
"Most of our general feelings - every sort of restraint, pleasure, tension, explosion in the play and counter play of our general feelings, …. likewise, and especially the condition of the nervus sympathicus excite our cause creating drive: we want to have a reason for feeling as we do." (Nietzsche, 228). People are afraid of all the unknown causes of things in the world and therefore come up with a reason as to why something happened the way it did. We tend to do this because it causes less stress and makes us feel more comfortable with the unknown. "
“Is war ever justified?”, is a question with its solution first originating from Christian theology. Saint Augustine was the first individual to offer a theory on this, and introduced the “Just War Theory”, which was later revised by Saint Thomas Aquinas, creating just 3 criteria to be met in order for a war to be just: “War needed to be waged by legitimate authority, have a just cause, and have the right intentions”. Since then, the “Just War Theory” was been used by many to justify their wars, however, there many other factors that were not taken into consideration that could be used to justify a war. I feel that war is justified and will be looking into points that are for the justification of war. War is justified when there is a “just cause”, and when it is used as a “last resort”.