Throughout Hamlet, written by William Shakespeare, the issue of whether to proceed on a moral route or to descend on a path of immorality and deceit arises in many decisions the main characters face. This leads to an intriguing plot in which Prince Hamlet’s inner struggle between morality and immorality stands in marked contrast to the completely immoral and evil actions of King Claudius. In the opening scenes, the reader is introduced to Claudius who, immediately following the death of his very own brother, marries his sister-in-law, who is Hamlet’s mother, Gertrude. This stark example of immorality is a clear indicator of Claudius’ moral compass and how far he is willing to go to achieve his goals. He is willing to violate the basic societal norms and completely disregard how his actions will negatively affect others. These basic societal norms are namely the fact that society frowns upon the act of murder in general and in this case, as a means to …show more content…
Unbeknownst to him, Hamlet slips into the room and possesses a golden opportunity to murder King Claudius once and for all. Hamlet stands over Claudius with a sword and debates committing the act of murder. The reason he provides for restraining himself is that he wants to murder Claudius when he is involved in his incestuous acts with his mother. Although this may seem plausible as reason enough to delay the act, I would suggest that that is only a cover. What Hamlet truly is debating is whether to allow his moral compass to dictate the course of action he takes. I believe that the “waiting for the right moment” reason is fictitious and that what Hamlet is debating is whether to commit an act of true evil in hoping that it will correct the wrongs which Claudius has committed. This dilemma is what leads him to be uncertain and what results in his inability to
Claudius is then compared to the internal organs of slaves and a man without morals, remorse or kindness (Ham.2.2.607-608). The powerful metaphors and adjectives used to describe Claudius not only express Hamlet’s intense contempt and disdain towards him, but also serve to convince Hamlet to commit murder. However, Hamlet depicts himself as a whore, a prostitute, and a swearing kitchen maid (Ham.2.2.614-616), reiterating the notion that he is worthless, as well as weak for expressing his emotions through words rather than actions. The shift from metaphors to similes indicate Hamlet’s failure to move past his cowardice and proceed with an act of revenge that would inflict
However, Hamlet cannot just kill in cold blood, he takes time to plan out every move and analyze the rights, wrongs, and consequences of every step he makes while seeking his revenge. Hamlet says in his soliloquy in 2.2.594-598: “This is most brave, That I, the son of a dear father murdered, Prompted to my revenge by heaven and hell, Must, like a whore, unpack my heart with words And fall a-cursing like a very drab, A scullion!” This quote is proof that Hamlet cannot seem to grasp why he cannot bring himself to kill Claudius. Hamlet comes across as a decent man. Killing is not something he can do in cold blood.
Hamlet was given the prime opportunity to kill Claudius when he found him on his knees begging for forgiveness. Hamlet negated not to kill him right then and there because he wanted Claudius to go to hell, not heaven. Hamlet’s lack of sanity, or his tragic flaw, in the play is definitely what caused his inability to
As Claudius repents, Hamlet feels as though it's the best time to kill him until he says: And so ’a goes to Heaven; And so am I revenged. That would be scanned. A villain kills my father; and for that, I, his son, do this same villain send To heaven (3.3.73-78) Essentially, Hamlet wanted to murder Claudius because he was the Old King’s murderer.
Hamlet is presented with several opportunities to pursue his vengeance, but delays each time for multiple reasons in which reveal his true nature. There are many reasons Hamlet restrains from killing Claudius. Firstly, Hamlet does not know whether the ghost should be believed or if it is just the devil in disguise trying to trick him. This is a valid reason because if the ghost is the devil, then Hamlet’s soul will be damned to the Hell. Hamlet’s
Firstly, Hamlet is a play of a man by the name of Hamlet, whose father was murdered by Claudius, his uncle. Claudius murdered the king by pouring poison in his ear to claim the throne for himself. Hamlet is then told by a ghost to murder Claudius for revenge, and he struggles within himself for the length of play whether to do it or not. When Hamlet begins to hesitate it does more damage than good and causes a chain reaction of tragic events, and makes the readers question whether Hamlet is truly sane or not. Claudius’s corruptness begins to show when he uses his authority to order those around him to rid of Hamlet.
This amorality stems from his desire to avenge the “rank and gross[ly]” (Shakespeare, 29) cruel actions of his uncle, the King Claudius. In the end however, both Hamlet and Claudius die with little pomp, victims of each other in a cyclical stream of karma. Shakespeare uses this eventuality to denounce the use of cruelty as a means to an end, for it brings nought but meaningless death. The fact that Hamlet becomes so cruel specifically because of Claudius’ treachery is a testament to the relationship between oppressor and oppressed. As Hamlet becomes that which he once hated, Shakespeare emphasizes the fact that the line between victim and oppressor is often more blurred than defined.
To be or not to be morally ambiguous is to have the lack of coherence in making moral life decisions. In Shakespeare's play Hamlet, the main character Hamlet goes through a great transformation. Hamlet seeks revenge toward Claudius who he believes killed his father for the throne. In many of Shakespeare’s play there is always a hero and a villain, but in Hamlet, Hamlet plays a pivotal role because he can be viewed as both the hero and the villain. Hamlet is seen as a morally ambiguous character due to the decisions he makes throughout the plot of the novel that ends up leading him to his demise.
There are several theories about why Hamlet delays in killing his Uncle, King Claudius. As the son of a murdered noble, Hamlet is obligated to avenge the death of his father. It’s a law, but he must first talk with god to ensure his safety in his journey and that taking vengeance will not send him straight to hell.
Hamlet's overthinking and inaction led to several unnecessary murders. Hamlet knew that Claudius is guilty, yet he still wants to make sure, therefore Hamlet made a play that played out the exact way that Claudius had killed King Hamlet. Hamlet had done this in order to watch how Claudius reacts to make sure that Claudius is the one who murdered his father, “I’ll observe his looks, if he do blench, I know my course” (Ham.2.2.583-585) “Now might I do it pat, now’a is a-praying. And now I’ll do’t” ( Ham.
His conscience was aligned with his religious beliefs which got in the way of allowing him to act on his thoughts. This sparked an inner conflict in Hamlet about what to do. When Hamlet was first told by the ghost to kill King Claudius, Hamlet overthinks the decision on throughout the book. Hamlet knows his conscience driven mind will prevent him from acting on his instincs to kill Claudius. “Thus conscience does make cowards of us all” (3.1.87) Hamlet is angry with himself that he has let his conscience come in the way.
Deliberation Brief – Julie Le Hamlet coming back home after long days ahead in school without any updates from his family and walking through the doors of his home full of excitement to meet his family but to find out that his father had passed away and his mother, Gertrude is now married to his father’s brother, King Claudius. I believe he was quite insane for a little bit due to the unexpected tragedy of his father and overwhelming thoughts rushing through his brain by his mother’s actions. The chose he has to decide for a split second is either to let the insanity take over his mind and be taken advantage of with more dangerous thoughts coming from his now so call enemies such as King Claudius and anybody in that house or, to actually act
The morality of murder stretches further than whether someone feels bad or not about their actions. Morality is what makes us human. It separates us from every other being in the world. Hamlet by Shakespeare exhibits many different types of mortality. It is not only in the story of Hamlet that the ethics of death are discussed but in the real lives of our soldiers that are fighting for our country.
Wow. Your response really helped me have a better understanding of Freud's psychoanalytic interpretation of Hamlet and I couldn't agree more with how important "close reading" is while working through Shakespeare's dense and difficult text. It's interesting to note on Freud's interpretation of the play as a dream and that his argument for Hamlet's delay in killing Claudius is because of a repressed Oedipus complex; he his actions are restrained because he has a subconscious desire to take the place of his father and lie with his mother. What I believe to be the main cause of the delay revolves around Shakespeare's intentional method of conveying a message to his audience. He wanted his audience to think and experience the moral issue of revenge.
A tragic hero is a multifaceted, admirable character with a tragic flaw that turns his life from glory into suffering. Hamlet is an example. ‘Born’ personality, shifting mentality, and inevitable fate leads to its tragedy which eventually triggers audience’s pity. Unlike other tragedies where tragic heros discover the truths by their own actions at the end of the story, realizing that the reversal was brought by their own actions. Hamlet begins differently by knowing the truth from things happening to him.