Throughout Charlotte Brontê’s Jane Eyre and Daphne DuMaurier’s Rebecca, morally ambiguous characters play key roles in their respective novels. Morally ambiguous characters are able to play key roles in the novels because their moral ambiguity often creates alternate directions in which the story can progress. These characters can also make changes to the plot unbeknownst to the main characters, and propel the story into unforeseen waters. In Rebecca, Mrs. Danvers is a morally ambiguous character, and plays a pivotal role in the sequence of events that occur throughout the novel. Mrs. Danvers’s deep love and grief for Rebecca causes her to act in questionable ways towards the narrator, and creates many scenarios that play a pivotal role in …show more content…
Danvers’s love and affection of Rebecca causes Mrs. Danvers to act in dubious ways towards the narrator, and creates many significant plot points of the novel. Mrs. Danvers and Rebecca were often around each other as maid and woman of the house, and they grew attached to each other. When Rebecca died and the narrator took her place, Mrs. Danvers grew resentful and wished to keep Rebecca’s name in peoples’ minds as Maxim’s best wife. Mrs. Danvers’s and Rebecca’s steadfast relationship is exhibited through Mrs. Danvers’s declaration that she “did everything for her. …‘We tried maid after maid but not one of them suited. ‘You maid me better than anyone, Danny’ she used to say, ‘I won’t have anyone but you’”. (du Maurier 171). Rebecca had many maids in her life before, but Mrs. Danvers clicked in a way that neither of them had experienced before. The strong liking towards Rebecca by Mrs. Danvers makes the transition to the narrator as Maxim’s new wife especially hard on Mrs. Danvers. She was so committed to helping, serving, and supporting Rebecca, and seeing Maxim marry a new woman like it’s no big deal enrages Mrs. Danvers. She wants to keep Rebecca’s reputation and memory alive, and wants to put down the narrator so that Rebecca can always be remembered. She suggests what the narrator should wear to the ball they are hosting, and tells the narrator that “All the pictures in the gallery would make good costumes,... especially that one of the young lady in white, with her …show more content…
Rochester to act in questionable ways towards his relationship with Jane, and affects Jane’s life and her relationship with Mr. Rochester. Prior to meeting Jane, Mr. Rochester got tricked into marrying an insane woman, and the effects of that relationship on Mr. Rochester causes issues involving trust and secrecy surrounding his and Jane’s relationship. At Jane and Edward’s wedding, Mr. Mason interrupts the wedding and accuses Mr. Rochester of already having a currently living wife, and although at first he tries to deny it, he then admits that he has “been married: and the woman to whom I was married lives!...I daresay you have many a time inclined your ear to gossip about the mysterious lunatic kept there under watch and ward.” (Brontë 296). People around town who live near Thornfield had always heard rumors about a lunatic woman at the hall, and Mr. Rochester reveals at the wedding that the presumed woman is his wife. Jane is absolutely shocked and devastated, and feels as though she can no longer trust Mr. Rochester. This wild turn of events causes her to leave Mr. Rochester and she eventually meets St. John. St. John and his sisters are later revealed to be Jane’s cousins, and Jane finds this discovery a truly “Glorious discovery to a lonely wretch! This was wealth indeed! Wealth to the heart! A mine of pure, genial affections. This was a blessing, bright, vivid, and exhilarating” (Brontë
Her actions with Jay end up ruining her relationship with Tom while altering her relationship with her daughter. As her relationship crumbles, she hopes that her daughter is a “little fool” because that is all a girl can be. This illustrates that the social norm for women at this time was to marry, showing the poor conditions women endured throughout the 1920s. Additionally, another woman in this novel, Jordan Baker, experienced harsh conditions similar to Daisy. For instance, Jordan knew she had to marry someone to secure her place in society.
Myrtle is caught cheating on Wilson because he does not provide her with a glamorous life and chooses to run away with a man who does not care about her. By choosing men for their credentials rather than their character, Myrtle ends up discontent with her life and relationships. Furthermore, one might marry someone with for their wealth or/and academic achievements without loving them leading to confusion and their expectations not being met. Daisy chooses to marry Tom because her love is penniless to satisfy the expectations of the society in the 1920s. At dinner she says, “I always watch for the longest day in the year and then miss it” (11).
Jane develops a *find quote about jane thinking her crush on Rochester is childlike* but is morally derailed when it is revealed that Mr. Rochester has been hiding his feral wife in the attic. This presents Jane with the arduous decision of choosing to stay with her love or to leave in the night. Jane chooses the latter the author, Emily Brontë writes, ***find quote**. Though this must have been a difficult decision, Jane choose, out of her selfless nature, to pursue an uncertain and dangerous path just to preserve a principled world. This is not only an impressive response when she was tested but it is a display of feminism.
She chooses the extravagant lifestyle that Tom is capable of providing instead of patiently waiting for her true love. The self-centered desires she displays demonstrates the lack of authetic love she promised Gatsby. Instead, she marries Tom “without so much as a shiver”, demonstrating her hedonistic mindset (76). Since Tom treats Daisy with minimal care, she thoughtlessly dives into an adulterous affair with Jay Gatsby. With no severe intentions towards marriage, she always “ought to have something in her life” to fulfill her heart (79).
The novel shows the reader that Tom Buchanan’s wife isn’t staying with him for love but for greed-filled reasons. One of those reasons being her not wanting to let go of the life she lives; Daisy was
There is a force of nature that overcomes people to prevent them from being entirely morally just or morally unjust. It is often seen when there are secrets that are hidden or if one’s motives behind actions are questionable. Although this applies to the real world, it is also frequently recognized in novels. Throughout Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre and Daphne Du Maurier’s Rebecca, it is evident through two characters, Edward Rochester and Maxim de Winter, that a person can be morally ambiguous.
In one example, Mrs. Danvers “forces [Rebecca’s] slippers over [the Narrator’s] hands” (Du Maurier 174) as she talks about Rebecca’s looks. She then tells the Narrator that she still feels Rebecca’s presence throughout Manderley(adverb) and “wonders if [Rebecca] comes back here to Manderley and watches you and Mr. De Winter together” (De Maurier 176). When Mrs. Danvers forces the Narrator to touch Rebecca’s belongings, she makes the Narrator suffer and feel tormented. Everything Mrs. Danvers says in this scene is said consciously to make the Narrator feel inferior to Rebecca. Mrs. Danvers knows that showing the Narrator the west wing will only negatively affect her but still continues on with her evil motives.
Myrtle is not happy with her life and tries to escape it to pursue her dream of being wealthy. When she is able to have an affair with Tom she sees this as a way to gain wealth and social status. But Myrtle will never be the only women in Tom’s life. An example of this is when Tom tells Daisy that he would always come back to her, “‘ And what’s more, I love Daisy too. Once in a while I go off on a spree and make a fool of myself, but I always come back, and in my heart I love her all the time.’”
They were both two totally different people who many differences such as their relationship with Maxim, their appearances, even their personalities where different. There are so many differences between Maxim’s relationship with Rebecca and his current relationship with his second wife, the new Mrs. De Winter also known as the stories narrator. The biggest similarity was the secrets that were kept in both of the relationships. In the first marriage the secrets were Rebecca’s and in the second one the secrets were Mr. De Winters or aka Maxim. The major difference between the two marriages is that while Rebecca was a very wicked and disloyal woman who did care for Maxim and cheated on with her own cousin Favell, his second wife loved him sincerely and was faithful to him and always trying to please him.
Finally, the details about society show that Jane recognizes the standards of her victorian society and needs to abide by them. After Jane had thought awhile, she no longer “felt justified in judging” Mr. Rochester and Blanche for “acting in conformity to ideas and principles instilled into them.” Though Jane wishes to be loved by Mr. Rochester, she comes to the realization that rich men do not marry lower-class women in her
Jane requests to return to the Reed house, after learning about her cousin’s suicide and her aunt, Mrs. Reed’s, illness; however Rochester questions, “And what good can you do her… you say she cast you off,” Jane replies, “Yes, sir, but that is long ago; and when her circumstances were very different: I could not be easy to neglect her wishes now” (Brontë 227). Jane looks beyond that Mrs. Reed “cast[ed] her off,” implying that she has grown to let go of grudges and developed a mature mentality. The irony of Jane’s inability to “neglect her wishes,” infers how the injustice treatment of Mrs. Reed unaffectedly brings Jane to look past the situation by visiting the Reeds in a time of sorrow. In addition, Rochester attempts to convince his wedded Jane to stay with him, after learning about his mad wife; Rochester claims that his father had “sent [him] out to Jamaica, to espouse a bride already courted for” him but only so his brother and father to get “thirty thousand pounds,” Rochester further admits to Jane that “you know now that I had but a hideous demon. I was wrong to attempt to deceive you…
Fitzgerald depicts the women of the novel as deceitful, sexual beings that are naturally subordinate to men through Daisy, Jordan, and Myrtle. Daisy exemplifies the naturally inferior role of women relying on the wealth of men in their lives to take care of them. When Daisy talks about her daughter she claims, “a fool–that’s the best thing a girl can be in this world, a beautiful little fool”(21) establishing women’s subordinate role in which they are ignorant to the affairs of their husbands and expected to rely on their beauty to carry them through life. When Daisy is accused of infidelity with Gatsby in the hotel, Gatsby claims that Daisy is attracted to men of wealth and, “only married [Tom] because [Gatsby] was poor and she was tired of waiting for [him]”(137).
She is not satisfied with her marriage, or with her low-class mechanic husband, George. This is evident when she says “I married him because I thought he was a gentleman,” she said finally. “I thought he knew something about breeding, but he wasn’t fit to lick
Rochester would have been Constantin in real life; Constantin was married and so was Rochester. Charlotte (Jane) fell in love with someone who was married. The likeness of these characters describe Charlotte’s life and how she felt. The British novelist, Charlotte Bronte, utilized her life experiences within her novel “Jane Eyre” to illustrate love, sexism and social status, and her comparison to fictional and non-fictional characters
- Edward is an economically independent man with a favorable status and influential connections still looking for a profitable match. Jane will be the one in charge to unmask him to the audience: “I saw he was going to marry her [Blanche Ingram] for family, perhaps political reasons, because her rank and connections suited him” (Brontë 205) This manner of conduct converts Mr. Rochester from a hero into a villain, a perpetrator and “his project of