Theory X And Theory Y-Gregor Theory Of Motivation

2553 Words11 Pages

Motivation is the word got from "motive" which means needs, goals, desires or drives inside of the people. It is the procedure of empowering individuals to activities to perform the objectives. In the work goal setting the psychological elements animating the individuals' behavior can be –
Desire for money
Victory/Success
Acknowledgment/Recognition
Work fulfillment/Job Satisfaction
Cooperation/Teamwork and so forth

Motivation is characterized as the process that guides, manages, and keeps up objective situated practices. Motivation is the thing that makes us act.
It includes the organic, passionate, social, and cognitive compels that actuate conduct. In regular use, the term motivation is regularly used to depict why an individual does something.

"The term motivation alludes to components that enact, …show more content…

In the event that this is not done, it will prompt inspiration issues

3) Theory X and Theory Y - Douglas McGregor planned Theory X and Theory Y proposing two parts of human behavior at work, or as it were, two separate perspectives of people (workers): one of which is negative, called as Theory X and the other is positive, alleged as Theory Y. As per McGregor, the view of chiefs on the way of people is focused around different suppositions.
Assumptions of Theory X
A normal worker naturally does not like work and tries to escape it at whatever point conceivable.
Since the representative would not like to work, he must be convinced, propelled, or cautioned with discipline to attain hierarchical objectives. A nearby supervision is needed on some piece of chiefs. The chiefs embrace a more oppressive style.
Numerous representatives rank professional stability on top, and they have practically zero yearning/ aspiration.
Representatives by and large dislike obligations.
Representatives oppose change.
A normal representative needs formal heading.

Assumptions of Theory

Open Document